Abstract 9851: Mortality and Post-Discharge Acute Care Utilization for Cardiovascular Conditions at US Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
Michael Liu,Jose F Figueroa,Yang Song,Rishi Wadhera,Michael LiuJose F FigueroaYang SongRishi WadheraHarvard Med Sch,Boston,MABrigham & Women's Hosp,Boston,MARichard A. and Susan F. Smith Cntr for Outcomes Rsch,Beth Israel Deaconess Med Cntr,Boston,MABoston,MA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.9851
IF: 37.8
2021-11-10
Circulation
Abstract:Introduction: Safety-net hospitals disproportionately care for medically complex, socially vulnerable, and racial/ethnic minority populations. Prior to the Affordable Care Act, safety-net hospitals had higher mortality and readmission rates for common cardiovascular conditions than their non-safety-net counterparts, but it is unclear whether these disparities remain. Methods: We conducted a serial, cross-sectional study using data from 3265 acute-care hospitals in the US. Performance on 30-day mortality, readmission, and excess days in acute care (EDAC) measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), stroke, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was compared at safety-net hospitals versus non-safety-net hospitals in fiscal year (FY) 2020 (July 2016 to June 2019) using linear regression models that adjusted for hospital-level characteristics. Interaction terms for safety-net status and year were used to assess for differential changes between FY 2010 (July 2006 to June 2009) and FY 2020. Results: Thirty-day mortality rates at safety-net hospitals compared with non-safety-net hospitals were lower for HF (10.9% vs 11.5%; adjusted difference: -0.49%, 95% CI: -0.65% to -0.33%), higher for AMI (12.8% vs 12.6%; adjusted difference: 0.15%, 0.04% to 0.26%), and similar for CABG and stroke. Thirty-day readmission rates were modestly higher at safety-net sites for AMI (16.4% vs 16.0%; adjusted difference: 0.37%, 0.26% to 0.48%) and HF (22.4% vs 21.8%; 0.58%, 0.44% to 0.72%), and comparable for CABG. However, safety-net hospitals performed markedly worse on the 30-day EDAC measures for AMI (15.2 vs 3.4 excess days; adjusted difference: 10.8, 95% CI: 8.3 to 13.4) and HF (14.1 vs 3.9 excess days; adjusted difference: 10.2, 6.4 to 10.4). From FY 2010 to FY 2020, differences in 30-day mortality and readmission rates differentially improved at safety-net sites for HF, but not AMI. Conclusions: Thirty-day mortality rates for common cardiovascular conditions are now similar at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. However, large gaps in 30-day post-discharge acute care utilization indicate that policy initiatives are still needed to support under-resourced safety-net systems and the patients they serve.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease