Abstract:Importance: Epigenetic clocks represent molecular evidence of disease risk and aging processes and have been used to identify how social and lifestyle characteristics are associated with accelerated biological aging. However, most research is based on samples of older adults who already have measurable chronic disease. Objective: To investigate whether and how sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics are associated with biological aging in a younger adult sample across a wide array of epigenetic clock measures. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was conducted using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a US representative cohort of adolescents in grades 7 to 12 in 1994 followed up for 25 years to 2018 over 5 interview waves. Participants who provided blood samples at wave V (2016-2018) were analyzed, with samples tested for DNA methylation (DNAm) in 2021 to 2024. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to May 2024. Exposure: Sociodemographic (sex, race and ethnicity, immigrant status, socioeconomic status, and geographic location) and lifestyle (obesity status by body mass index [BMI] in categories of reference range or underweight [<25], overweight [25 to <30], obesity [30 to <40], and severe obesity [≥40]; exercise level; tobacco use; and alcohol use) characteristics were assessed. Main outcome and measure: Biological aging assessed from banked blood DNAm using 16 epigenetic clocks. Results: Data were analyzed from 4237 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [2.0] years; percentage [SE], 51.3% [0.01] female and 48.7% [0.01] male; percentage [SE], 2.7% [<0.01] Asian or Pacific Islander, 16.7% [0.02] Black, 8.7% [0.01] Hispanic, and 71.0% [0.03] White). Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were more often associated with biological aging in clocks trained to estimate morbidity and mortality (eg, PhenoAge, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE) than clocks trained to estimate chronological age (eg, Horvath). For example, the β for an annual income less than $25 000 vs $100 000 or more was 1.99 years (95% CI, 0.45 to 3.52 years) for PhenoAgeAA, 1.70 years (95% CI, 0.68 to 2.72 years) for GrimAgeAA, 0.33 SD (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48 SD) for DunedinPACE, and -0.17 years (95% CI, -1.08 to 0.74 years) for Horvath1AA. Lower education, lower income, higher obesity levels, no exercise, and tobacco use were associated with faster biological aging across several clocks; associations with GrimAge were particularly robust (no college vs college or higher: β = 2.63 years; 95% CI, 1.67-3.58 years; lower vs higher annual income: <$25 000 vs ≥$100 000: β = 1.70 years; 95% CI, 0.68-2.72 years; severe obesity vs no obesity: β = 1.57 years; 95% CI, 0.51-2.63 years; no weekly exercise vs ≥5 bouts/week: β = 1.33 years; 95% CI, 0.67-1.99 years; current vs no smoking: β = 7.16 years; 95% CI, 6.25-8.07 years). Conclusions and relevance: This study found that important social and lifestyle factors were associated with biological aging in a nationally representative cohort of younger adults. These findings suggest that molecular processes underlying disease risk may be identified in adults entering midlife before disease is manifest and inform interventions aimed at reducing social inequalities in heathy aging and longevity.

Associations between epigenetic age acceleration and longitudinal measures of psychosocioeconomic stress and status

ASSOCIATIONS OF GENETICS AND LIFE COURSE CIRCUMSTANCES WITH A NOVEL AGING MEASURE THAT CAPTURES MORTALITY RISK

Cumulative stress across the lifecourse and biological aging in adulthood

Epigenetic aging and perceived psychological stress in old age

Associations of Genetics, Behaviors, and Life Course Circumstances with a Novel Aging and Healthspan Measure: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.

Psychosocial Disadvantage During Childhood and Midlife Health: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program

Socioeconomic position, lifestyle habits and biomarkers of epigenetic aging: a multi-cohort analysis

Psychosocial adversity and socioeconomic position during childhood and epigenetic age: analysis of two prospective cohort studies

Disentangling the Contribution of Childhood and Adulthood Circumstances and Genetics to Phenotypic Aging: Prospective Cohort Study

Psychological stress and epigenetic aging in older men: The VA normative aging study

Associations of Epigenetic Age Estimators With Cognitive Function Trajectories in the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study

Epigenetic Biomarkers of Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Age-Related Chronic Diseases and Mortality in Older Adults

Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Factors and Epigenetic Aging in US Young Adults: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program

The Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Correlates of Epigenetic Aging in a Nationally Representative U.S. Study of Younger Adults

Lagged effects of childhood depressive symptoms on adult epigenetic aging

Loneliness, epigenetic age acceleration, and chronic health conditions.

Epigenome-wide association study of long-term psychosocial stress in older adults

Associations of DNA-Methylation Measures of Biological Aging With Social Disparities in Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Lifetime chronic stress Exposures, stress Hormones, and biological Aging: Results from the midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study

Accelerated epigenetic aging mediates link between adverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms in older adults: Results from the Health and Retirement Study

Stressful Life Events, Social Support, and Epigenetic Aging in the Women's Health Initiative.