Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in the Elderly: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Yosuke Igarashi,Koichiro Haruki,Kenei Furukawa,Tomohiko Taniai,Mitsuru Yanagaki,Norimitsu Okui,Yoshihiro Shirai,Masashi Tsunematsu,Taro Sakamoto,Toru Ikegami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17081

Abstract:Background/aim: With the aging of the population, there is a rising proportion of elderly patients undergoing liver resection. However, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the elderly have not yet been established. In this study, we compared the short-term results of LLR and open liver resection (OLR) in elderly patients using propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. Patients and methods: The study comprised 237 elderly patients aged 65 years and older who had undergone liver resection between 2015 to 2021, excluding biliary and vascular reconstruction and simultaneous surgeries other than liver resection. We conducted PSM analysis for baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, ASA-PS, disease, procedure, tumor size, and number of tumors) to eliminate potential selection bias. We then compared short-term postoperative outcomes between LLR and OLR groups in patients selected by PSM analysis. Results: Applying PSM analysis, 90 cases each were selected for the LLR and OLR groups. The LLR group had a significantly lower complication rate (Clavien-Dindo: CD ≥II) (19% vs. 33%, p=0.03), especially bile leakage (CD ≥II) (0% vs. 6.7%, p=0.03) compared with those in the OLR group. In addition, a shorter operation time (244 min vs. 351 min, p<0.01), less blood loss (150 ml vs. 335 ml, p<0.01), and shorter hospital stay (8 days vs. 12 days, p<0.01) were observed in the LLR group. No operative or in-hospital deaths were observed in both groups. Conclusion: LLR can be safely performed in elderly patients and offers better short-term outcomes.