Space between bone cement and bony endplate can trigger higher incidence of augmented vertebral collapse: An in-silico study

Ji Chen,Shihao Lu,Yong Chen,Xiang Zhang,Zhipeng Xi,Lin Xie,Jingchi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.05.020
Abstract:Background: The pathogenesis of postoperative complications in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures (OVCFs) undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is multifaceted, with local biomechanical deterioration playing a pivotal role. Specifically, the disparity in stiffness between the bone cement and osteoporotic cancellous bone can precipitate interfacial stress concentrations, potentially leading to cement-augmented vertebral body collapse and clinical symptom recurrence. This study focuses on the biomechanical implications of the space between the bone cement and bony endplate (BEP), hypothesizing that this interface may be a critical locus for stress concentration and subsequent vertebral failure. Methods: Leveraging a validated numerical model from our previous study, we examined the biomechanical impact of the cement-BEP interface in the L2 vertebral body post-PVP, simulated OVCF and PVP and constructed three distinct models: one with direct bone cement contact with both cranial and caudal BEPs, one with contact only with the caudal BEPs and one without contact with either BEP. Moreover, we assessed stress distribution across cranial and caudal BEPs under various loading conditions to describe the biomechanical outcomes associated with each model. Results: A consistent trend was observed across all models: the interfaces between the bone cement and cancellous bone exhibited higher stress values under the majority of loading conditions compared to models with direct cement-BEP contact. The most significant difference was observed in the flexion loading condition compared to the mode with direct contact between BEP and cement. The maximum stress in models without direct contact increased by at least 30%. Conclusions: Our study reveals the biomechanical significance of interfacial stiffness differences at the cement-BEP junction, which can exacerbate local stress concentrations and predispose to augmented vertebral collapse. We recommend the strategic distribution of bone cement to encompass a broader contact area with the BEP for preventing biomechanical failure and subsequent vertebral collapse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?