Abstract:Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a universally dreaded complication of any surgical procedure. The goal of this single-center study was to examine the issue of orthopaedic instrument wrapping defects with a focus on the importance of a high level of surveillance to enable identification of these defects in order to reduce the risk of instrument contamination. We also evaluated the impact on patient care, theatre staff, hospital finances and resource utilization during a defined study period in order to stimulate critical discussion and further research into potentially eliminating this problem via change in practice and advances in technology. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first paper that looks at this problem from the above perspective within the United Kingdom National Health Service. Methods We conducted a prospective service evaluation project over a 30-week period from December 2021 to July 2022 across our three hospital sites within the United Kingdom National Health Service. We collated data on defects found in orthopaedic instrument wrappings as detected by visual inspection under ambient or theater lighting and the resulting surgical case cancellations. Defect types included in the study were all puncture holes, abrasions or tears visible to the naked eye irrespective of their size. Results A total of 601 orthopaedic sets were rejected during the study period due to defects identified in the sterile instrument wrappings. Of these, 437 were due to holes/tears in the wrapping, 129 were due to wet inner wrappings and 35 were due to insecure wrappings. This directly resulted in same-day cancellation of 13 surgical cases or 0.27% of booked cases with extra sets required for the other affected cases. These 13 cases could not proceed as they involved loan kits where no remedial action could be taken. Remedial action was required for the other 588 operation list cases affected by the sterile wrapping defects. The majority of the identified defects and resulting theatre case cancellations (61.5%) were in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. The calculated potential financial loss due to these problems was £145,000 over the seven-month study period. This financial cost is equivalent to the best practice top-up tariff in England for treating approximately 108 hip fracture patients based on £1,335 per patient. Conclusion Our study identified defects in the sterile instrument wrappings affecting both the inner with or without involving the outer wrapping layer and resulting in cancellation of elective and trauma orthopaedic cases with resultant clinical and financial implications. There is a need to be more vigilant in identifying defects in drapes. Further research is warranted to improve ways of identifying defects in sterile wrappings and devise new protective mechanisms during sterilisation that can eliminate the use of sterile instrument wrappings.

SAFE USE OF INTRA-OPERATIVE TOURNIQUETS IN A DISTRICT HOSPITAL IN THE UK-AN AUDIT STUDY IN ORTHOPAEDIC THEATRES AND REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE

Embracing Digital Transformation: A Three-Cycle Audit on Improving Intraoperative Tourniquet Documentation Following BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma) Guidelines

The risks associated with tourniquet use in lower limb trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review of tourniquet use in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: can we extrapolate from adult guidelines?

Development and psychometric evaluation of a pneumatic tourniquet work standards scale

Tight application of a surgical tourniquet prior to inflation increases venous pressure in the upper limb; Potentially resulting in increased blood loss and poorer visibility

The history of tourniquet use in limb surgery

A Clinical Audit of Operation Notes Documentation and the Impact of Introducing an Improved Proforma: An Audit Cycle

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of orthopedic operating room personnel regarding the use of pneumatic tourniquets

Effects of the Timing of Tourniquet Release in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Implementing Tourniquet Conversion Guidelines for Civilian EMS and Prehospital Organizations : A Case Report and Review

Summary of the best evidence for the safe use of pneumatic tourniquet in limb surgery

Comparison of Tourniquet Application Only During Cementation and Long-Duration Tourniquet Application in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis

Influence of the Tourniquet on Pain and Function in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Five-Year Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Not using a tourniquet is superior to tourniquet use for high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

The Impact of Sterile Instrument Set Wrapping Defects on Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Theatre Lists

Impact of time and distance on outcomes following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings: A scoping review

Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review of prehospital tourniquet use in civilian limb trauma

Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) protocol