Abstract:Background Optimal selection of vascular access devices is based on multiple factors and is the first strategy to reduce vascular access device‐related complications. This process is dependent on behavioural and human factors. The COM‐B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model was used as a theoretical framework to organize the findings of this systematic review. Methods/Aims To synthesize the evidence on determinants shaping the optimal selection of vascular access devices, using the COM‐B behavioural model as the theoretical framework. Design Systematic review of studies which explore decision‐making at the time of selecting vascular access devices. Data Sources The Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and EbscoHost databases were interrogated to extract manuscripts published up to 31 December 2021, in English or Spanish. Results Among 16 studies included in the review, 8/16 (50%) focused on physical capability, 8/16 (50%) psychological capability, 15/16 (94%) physical opportunity, 12/16 (75%) social opportunity, 1/16 (6%) reflective motivation and 0/16 (0%) automatic motivation. This distribution represents a large gap in terms of interpersonal and motivational influences and cultural and social environments. Specialist teams (teams created for the insertion or maintenance of vascular access devices) are core for the optimal selection of vascular access devices (75% physical capability, 62% psychological capability, 80% physical opportunity and 100% social opportunity). Conclusion Specialist teams predominantly lead all actions undertaken towards the optimal selection of vascular access devices. These actions primarily centre on assessing opportunity and capability, often overlooking motivational influences and social environments. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care A more implementation‐focused professional approach could decrease inequity among patients and complications associated with vascular access devices. Impact Optimal selection of vascular access devices is the primary strategy in mitigating complications associated with these devices. There is a significant disparity between interpersonal and motivational influences and the cultural and social environments. Furthermore, specialized teams play a pivotal role in facilitating the optimal selection of vascular access devices. The study can benefit institutions concerned about vascular access devices and their complications. Reporting Method This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patient or public contribution No Patient or Public Contribution. What does this article contribute to the wider global clinical community? Optimal selection of vascular devices remains a growing yet unresolved issue with costly clinical and patient experience impact. Interventions to improve the optimal selection of vascular devices have focused on training, education, algorithms and implementation of specialist vascular teams; alas, these approaches do not seem to have substantially addressed the problem. Specialist vascular teams should evolve and pivot towards leading the implementation of quality improvement interventions, optimizing resource use and enhancing their role.

An Explanatory Model of Vascular Access Care Quality: Results of a Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Training, management, and quality of nursing care of vascular access in adult patients: The INCATIV project

Implementation of a vascular access team and an intravenous therapy programme: A first-year activity analysis

Validation of a vascular access specific quality of life measure (VASQoL)

Impact of a Peripheral Vascular Access Service on Device Use

Vascular access specialist teams versus standard practice for catheter insertion and prevention of failure: a systematic review

Assessment, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Phlebitis Related to Peripheral Venous Catheterisation: A Delphi Study in Spain

National practice of Nursing professionals in the insertion of peripheral vascular access devices

Assessing Nurses’ Satisfaction with Continuity of Care and the Case Management Model as an Indicator of Quality of Care in Spain

Quality of care in peripheral venous catheterization: A scoping review

Self-assessment of a breast care nursing model within a Breast Unit: learning process and keys to improving breast care

Educational intervention to improve management of totally implanted vascular access device

Incidence and risk factors of phlebitis associated to peripheral intravenous catheters

Determinants of the optimal selection of vascular access devices: A systematic review underpinned by the COM‐B behavioural model

Safe patient care when using vascular access devices

Aligning peripheral intravenous catheter quality with nursing culture—A mixed method study

A scoping review of Clinical Studies, Hospital Group Reports and National Strategic Documents on vascular access devices in cancer patients

Nursing Practices and Sensitive Outcomes Related to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Portugal: A Scoping Review

Non-Adherence to Peripheral Venous Catheter Care Protocols Significantly Decreases Patient Safety and Impacts Costs: A Retrospective Observational Study

Vascular Access Perception and Quality of Life of Haemodialysis Patients

Patency, assessment, and management of central catheter occlusion in adult patients in the intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project