Resting state EEG relates to short- and long-term cognitive functioning after cardiac arrest

A B Glimmerveen,M M L H Verhulst,N L M de Kruijf,P van Gils,T Delnoij,J Bonnes,C M van Heugten,M J A M Van Putten,J Hofmeijer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110253
IF: 6.251
Resuscitation
Abstract:Background: Approximately half of cardiac arrest survivors have persistent cognitive impairment. Guidelines recommend early screening to identify patients at risk for cognitive impairment, but there is no consensus on the best screening method. We aimed to identify quantitative EEG measures relating with short- and long-term cognitive function after cardiac arrest for potential to cognitive outcome prediction. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study designed to develop a prediction model for cognitive outcome after cardiac arrest. For the current analysis, we used twenty-minute EEG registrations from 80 patients around one week after cardiac arrest. We calculated power spectral density, normalized alpha-to-theta ratio (nATR), peak frequency, and center of gravity (CoG) of this peak frequency. We related these with global cognitive functioning (scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)) at one week, three and twelve months follow-up with multivariate mixed effect models, and with performance on standard neuropsychological examination at twelve months using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: Each individual EEG parameter related to MoCA at one week (βnATR = 7.36; P < 0.01; βpeak frequency = 1.73, P < 0.01; βCoG = -9.88, P < 0.01). The nATR also related with the MoCA at three months ((βnATR = 2.49; P 0.01). No EEG metrics significantly related to the MoCA score at twelve months. nATR and peak frequency related with memory performance at twelve months. Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Early resting-state EEG parameters relate with short-term global cognitive functioning and with memory function at one year after cardiac arrest. Additional predictive values in multimodal prediction models need further study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?