Optic nerve sheath diameter and eyeball transverse diameter in severe head injury and its correlation with intracranial pressure

Danyca Shadé Breedt,Brad Harrington,Ian Scott Walker,Armin Gretchel,Adriaan Johannes Vlok
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108310
Abstract:Background: Gold standard for determining intracranial pressure (ICP), intraventricular catheter, is invasive with associated risks. Non-invasive investigations like magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography have demonstrated correlation between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and raised ICP. However, computed tomography (CT) is accessible and less operator-dependent. Literature shows variable results regarding correlations between ICP and ONSD on CT. The study aimed to investigate correlations between raised ICP and ONSD, eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), and ONSD/ETD ratios on CT scan(s) of severe head injuries. Methods: A retrospective review of a three-year prospectively-maintained database of severe traumatic head injuries in patients who had ICP measurements and CT scans was conducted. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), ICP, ONSD 3 mm and 9 mm behind the globe, ETD, ONSD/ETD ratios, CT Marshall Grade, and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) were recorded. Statistical analysis assessed correlations between ICP and CT measurements. Results: Seventy-four patients were assessed; mortality rate: 36.5 %. Assault (48.6 %) and pedestrian-vehicle collisions (21.6 %) were the most common mechanisms. CT Marshall Grade correlated significantly with 3 mm and 9 mm ONSD, ONSD/ETD ratios, GCS, and GCS motor score, which correlated significantly with GOS. No significant correlation was found between ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratios. Marshall Grade was not significantly associated with ICP measurements but correlated with injury severity. Conclusions: Unlike previous studies, our study not only investigated the correlation between ICP and single variables (ONSD and ETD) but also the ONSD/ETD ratios. No correlations were observed between raised ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratio on CT in neurotrauma patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?