Contemporary outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe: the ERCTO registry
Giuseppe Vadalà,Alfredo R Galassi,Gerald S Werner,George Sianos,Nicolaus Boudou,Roberto Garbo,Laura Maniscalco,Alexander Bufe,Alexander Avran,Gabriele L Gasparini,Eugenio La Scala,Andrew Ladwiniec,Meruzhan Saghatelyan,Omer Goktekin,Sevket Gorgulu,Nicolaus Reifart,Pierfrancesco Agostoni,Sudhir Rathore,Mohamed Ayoub,Michael Behnes,Iskander Atmowihardjo,Mario Iannaccone,Roberto Diletti,Carlo Di Mario,Kambis Mashayekhi,On Behalf Of The Euro Cto Investigators,Alfredo R. Galassi,Gerald S. Werner,Gabriele L. Gasparini,on behalf of the EURO CTO investigators
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-23-00490
2024-02-01
EuroIntervention
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) have reached high procedural success rates thanks to dedicated equipment, evolving techniques, and worldwide adoption of state-of-the-art crossing algorithms.AIMS: We report the contemporary results of CTO PCIs performed by a large European community of experienced interventionalists. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of different risk factors for procedural major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and trends of employment of specific devices like dual lumen microcatheters, guiding catheter extensions, intravascular ultrasound and calcium-modifying tools.METHODS: We evaluated data from 8,673 CTO PCIs included in the European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion (ERCTO) between January 2021 and October 2022.RESULTS: The overall technical success rate was 89.1% and was higher in antegrade as compared with retrograde cases (92.8% vs 79.3%; p<0.001). Compared with antegrade procedures, retrograde procedures had a higher complexity of attempted lesions (Japanese CTO [J-CTO] score: 3.0±1.0 vs 1.9±1.2; p<0.001), a higher procedural and in-hospital MACCE rate (3.1% vs 1.2%; p<0.018) and a higher perforation rate with and without tamponade (1.5% vs 0.4% and 8.3% vs 2.1%, respectively; p<0.001). As compared with mid-volume operators, high-volume operators had a higher technical success rate in antegrade and retrograde procedures (93.4% vs 91.2% and 81.5% vs 69.0%, respectively; p<0.001), and had a lower MACCE rate (1.47% vs 2.41%; p<0.001) despite a higher mean complexity of the attempted lesions (J-CTO score: 2.42±1.28 vs 2.15±1.27; p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of different recanalisation techniques, operator experience and the use of specific devices have contributed to a high procedural success rate despite the high complexity of the lesions documented in the ERCTO.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems