The survival outcome differs between left-sided colon cancer and middle/low rectal cancer after colorectal hepatic metastasectomy

Jin-Han Yang,Wen-Ling Lin,Wei-Shone Chen,Jeng-Kai Jiang,Shung-Haur Yang,Huann-Sheng Wang,Shih-Ching Chang,Yuan-Tzu Lan,Chun-Chi Lin,Hung-Hsin Lin,Sheng-Chieh Huang,Hou-Hsuan Cheng,Yi-Wen Yang,Yu-Zu Lin,Hui-Mei Hsu,Ching-Jui Lin,Hao-Wei Teng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.020
Abstract:Background: The clinical outcomes between left-sided colon cancer and middle/low rectal cancer seem to be different. This study aimed to examine the effect of primary tumor location regarding the left-sided colon and middle/low rectum on the overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent colorectal hepatic metastasectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent colorectal hepatic metastasectomy were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the primary tumor location (left-sided colon and middle/low rectum). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Student t test. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Overall, 365 patients were enrolled. Patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly better OS than those with middle/low rectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.725; P = .018), with median OS estimates of 48 and 38 months, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of RAS mutations, patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly prolonged OS compared with those with middle/low rectum cancer (HR, 0.608; P = .034), with median OS estimates of 49 and 26 months, respectively. This observation was limited to patients with RAS mutations. Conclusion: According to our findings, patients with middle/low rectal cancer had poorer survival outcome and should not be categorized together with patients with left-sided colon cancer in terms of OS after colorectal hepatic metastasectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?