Red-complex bacteria exhibit distinctly different interactions with human periodontal ligament stromal cells compared to Fusobacterium nucleatum

Fabian L Kendlbacher,Susanne Bloch,Fiona F Hager-Mair,Christina Schäffer,Oleh Andrukhov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106004
Abstract:Objective: The red-complex bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia together with Fusobacterium nucleatum are essential players in periodontitis. This study investigated the bacterial interplay with human periodontal ligament mesenchymal stromal cells (hPDL-MSCs) which act in the acute phase of periodontal infection. Design: The capability of the bacteria to induce an inflammatory response as well as their viability, cellular adhesion and invasion were analyzed upon mono- and co-infections of hPDL-MSCs to delineate potential synergistic or antagonistic effects. The expression level and concentration of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 were measured using qRT-PCR and ELISA. Viability, invasion, and adhesion were determined quantitatively using agar plate culture and qualitatively by confocal microscopy. Results: Viability of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia but not F. nucleatum was preserved in the presence of hPDL-MSCs, even in an oxygenated environment. F. nucleatum significantly increased the expression and concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1 in hPDL-MSCs, while T. forsythia and P. gingivalis caused only a minimal inflammatory response. Co-infections in different combinations had no effect on the inflammatory response. Moreover, P. gingivalis mitigated the increase in cytokine levels elicited by F. nucleatum. Both red-complex bacteria adhered to and invaded hPDL-MSCs in greater numbers than F. nucleatum, with only a minor effect of co-infections. Conclusions: Oral bacteria of different pathogenicity status interact differently with hPDL-MSCs. The data support P. gingivalis' capability to manipulate the inflammatory host response. Further research is necessary to obtain a comprehensive picture of the role of hPDL-MSCs in more complex oral biofilms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?