Abstract:Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity, and identify pre-operative factors which could predict susceptibility to hypersensitivity reactions among patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present study used a testing method consistent with the recognised biological response to metals. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional analysis of 220 patients was conducted. All patients received a testing protocol using lymphocyte transformation test to evaluate reactivity to possible contents of orthopaedic implants. Test response is interpreted as stimulation index (SI) values. A comprehensive questionnaire was used to evaluate prior exposure. Patients were categorised according to SI values and the odds ratios (OR) were calculated as comparative effect measure for each predetermined prior exposure factor. Results: The prevalence of metal sensitivity response was 28% (n = 61) among patients with susceptibility to at least one agent (SI = 2 to 4.9), and 3.2% (n = 7) among patients with true hypersensitivity (SI ≥ 5). The population-weighted prevalence, adjusted for sampling weights of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, was SI ≥ 5 = 4.7% (95% CI 0.4-11.8%) and SI ≥ 2 = 35.2% (95% CI 24.8-48.6%). Stimulation index levels of response to materials were markedly varied with the highest being aluminium. Female sex, smoking history, cutaneous reaction to jewellery, occupational exposure, and dental procedures were among factors shown to increase the odds of having higher reactivity response to tested metals. Nevertheless, patients with well-functioning prior contralateral TKA did not appear at greater risk of having either sensitivity or susceptibility with odds ratio (OR) = 0.2 (95% CI 0.01-3.2), p: NS and OR = 0.6 (95% CI 0.3-1.2), p: NS, respectively. Prior positive patch test was neither predictor of susceptibility to hypersensitivity OR = 1.2 (95% CI 0.6-2.6) p: NS nor predictor of true hypersensitivity OR = 0.7 (95% CI 0.08-6.1), p: NS. Conclusion: Among patients scheduled for primary TKA with no prior clinical features of metal allergy the prevalence of true hypersensitivity to at least one metal is just over 3%. Patients are likely to encounter a material to which they have pre-existing susceptibility to hypersensitivity. With certain prior exposure factors, there was increased susceptibility to metal hypersensitivity reaction evoking an acquired condition. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective cross-sectional study.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have and Do Not Have Self-Reported Nickel Allergy: Matched and Unmatched Cohort Comparisons

Nickel allergy does not correlate with function after total knee arthroplasty

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

Suspected Metal Allergy and Femoral Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Diagnostic Dilemma

The impact of allergies on patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Titanium-Nitride Coating Does Not Result in a Better Clinical Outcome Compared to Conventional Cobalt-Chromium Total Knee Arthroplasty after a Long-Term Follow-Up: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Positive Reactions to Nickel on a Patch Test Do Not Predict Clinical Outcome of Nickel Alloy-Based Atrial Septal Defect Occluder Implantation

Lymphocyte transformation test reveals low prevalence of true metal hypersensitivity among pre-operative total knee arthroplasty patients

Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy

Metal Allergy in Total-Joint Arthroplasty Case Report and Literature Review

Metal implant allergy: A retrospective cohort analysis at a university allergy practice

Nickel allergy in interatrial shunt device-based closure patients.

Concentrations of Cobalt, Chromium and Titanium and Immunological Changes after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Cohort Study with an 18-Year Follow-Up

Additional Procedures at the Time of Total Ankle Replacement Do Not Increase Risk of Short-term Complications: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Impact of Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema) and Its Treatment on the Risk of Adverse Events Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Risk Stratification and Pain Outcomes Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Adverse Local Tissue Reactions

Patients Who Have Prior Solid Organ Transplants Have Increased Risk Of 10-Year Periprosthetic Joint Infection Revision Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matched Analysis

Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With a History of Patella Fracture: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

The influence of implant factors on patient outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty

Characterization and Potential Relevance of Randomized Controlled Trial Patient Populations in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review