Abstract:Educational and Psychological Measurement, Ahead of Print. Rapid-guessing behavior in data can compromise our ability to estimate item and person parameters accurately. Consequently, it is crucial to model data with rapid-guessing patterns in a way that can produce unbiased ability estimates. This study proposes and evaluates three alternative modeling approaches that follow the logic of the effort-moderated item response theory model (EM-IRT) to analyze response data with rapid-guessing responses. One is the two-step EM-IRT model, which utilizes the item parameters estimated by respondents without rapid-guessing behavior and was initially proposed by Rios and Soland without further investigation. The other two models are effort-moderated multidimensional models (EM-MIRT), which we introduce in this study and vary as both between-item and within-item structures. The advantage of the EM-MIRT model is to account for the underlying relationship between rapid-guessing propensity and ability. The three models were compared with the traditional EM-IRT model regarding the accuracy of parameter recovery in various simulated conditions. Results demonstrated that the two-step EM-IRT and between-item EM-MIRT model consistently outperformed the traditional EM-IRT model under various conditions, with the two-step EM-IRT estimation generally delivering the best performance, especially for ability and item difficulty parameters estimation. In addition, different rapid-guessing patterns (i.e., difficulty-based, changing state, and decreasing effort) did not affect the performance of the two-step EM-IRT model. Overall, the findings suggest that the EM-IRT model with the two-step parameter estimation method can be applied in practice for estimating ability in the presence of rapid-guessing responses due to its accuracy and efficiency. The between-item EM-MIRT model can be used as an alternative model when there is no significant mean difference in the ability estimates between examinees who exhibit rapid-guessing behavior and those who do not.

An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures

Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.

Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model

A Mixture Model for Random Responding Behavior in Forced-Choice Noncognitive Assessment: Implication and Application in Organizational Research

On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model

Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model.

The Conventional and the IRT-based Scoring Methods of Forced-Choice Personality Tests

The Generalized Thurstonian Unfolding Model (GTUM): Advancing the Modeling of Forced-Choice Data

Item Response Theory -- A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurement

Influencing factors of Thurstonian IRT model in faking-resisting forced-choice questionnaire

On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models

Semiparametric Factor Analysis for Item-Level Response Time Data

A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats

Contributions to the statistical analysis of item response time in educational testing

Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model

Robust Measurement Via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model

Development and Calibration of an Item Response Model that Incorporates Response Time

Linear Factor Analytic Thurstonian Forced-Choice Models: Current Status and Issues

Enhancing Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Models by Evaluating a Two-Step Estimation Method and Multidimensional Variations on the Model

Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items

The Development of Forced-choice Personality Scale for Neuroticism And Its Effect of Faking Resistance