Unilateral Bi/Multi-Portal Endoscopy for the Treatment of Complicated Lumbar Degenerative Diseases with Utilization of Uniaxial Spinal Endoscope, Instead of Arthroscope: Technique Note and Clinical Results
Liyu Yang,Long Zhou,Guanqi Wang,Min Qiu,Feng Liang,Changqing Jia,Weibing Xu,Qin Fu,Liqing Yang,Gen Ba
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S417462
IF: 3.829
2023-08-09
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Liyu Yang, 1, &ast Long Zhou, 1, &ast Guanqi Wang, 2 Min Qiu, 1 Feng Liang, 1 Changqing Jia, 1 Weibing Xu, 3 Qin Fu, 1 Liqing Yang, 1 Gen Ba 1 1 Department of Orthopedic, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; 2 Rehabilitation Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; 3 Spinal Surgery, Dalian Central Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Gen Ba, Department of Orthopedic, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Sanhao Street 36, He Ping District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China, 110004, Tel +86 18940259116, Email Objective: This article aims to discuss a novel surgical strategy, referred to as unilateral bi/multi-portal endoscopy (UME), which used a uniaxial spinal endoscope instead of an arthroscope in the traditional unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) surgical procedure in our study of the treatment of complicated lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods: This retrospective study included 42 patients diagnosed with high-migrated lumbar disc herniation and bilateral spinal stenosis who underwent UME surgery from January 2021 to December 2021. Patients included 20 men and 22 women, with an average age of 55.97± 14.92 years. The average follow-up period was 13.19 months. The demographic data, operation time (min), and complications were recorded and analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes. Three-dimensional CT scans and MRI were conducted to evaluate the radiographic improvement. Results: A total of 26 patients were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation and 16 with lumbar spinal stenosis. All 42 patients underwent UME surgery and achieved satisfactory outcomes. The operation time was 154.46± 46.09 min. The average follow-up time was 13.19± 1.33 months. The preoperative back pain (VAS-Back) and the last follow-up VAS-Back were 3.84± 1.00 and 0.70± 0.46, respectively (P < 0.05). The preoperative leg pain (VAS-Leg) and the last follow-up VAS-Leg were 6.46± 1.08 and 1.03± 0.64, respectively (P < 0.05). Significant differences existed between preoperative ODI scores (58.70± 11.22%) and the last follow-up ODI scores (9.24± 3.04%; P< 0.05). All patients achieved significant pain relief and functional improvement after the surgery. No severe complications occurred, except for two cases of postoperative dysesthesia and one case suffered from vertebral compression fractures induced by a postoperative accidental injury. Symptoms of numbness disappeared within one week with treatment using dexamethasone and neurotrophic drugs. The vertebral fracture case recovered with percutaneous kyphoplasty treatment. Conclusion: This study suggests that UME is a promising treatment strategy for high-migrated disc herniation and bilateral spinal stenosis. Keywords: unilateral bi/multi-portal endoscopy, lumbar degenerative diseases, high-migrated disc herniation, bilateral spinal stenosis, ligamentum flavum, spinal endoscope Lumbar degenerative disease is a common clinical disease that plagues public health, particularly for those over 60 years of age. 1 Surgical intervention is often recommended for patients with severe or progressive nerve injury, chronic pain, or ineffective non-surgical treatment. Open surgery is the classical procedure for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. However, the considerable iatrogenic trauma associated with surgery, particularly intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw internal fixation, exerts a strong negative effect on anatomical tissues such as muscles and ligaments. 2 Although the immediate postoperative outcome is typically good, concerns exist of long-term adjacent disc reprotrusion, high risk of infection and hemorrhage, severe back pain, secondary stenosis of the spinal canal, and subsidence of the fusion cage. 3,4 Percutaneous spinal endoscopy under aqueous medium for discectomy and spinal canal decompression, such as percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) have gradually replaced the traditional open laminectomy with discectomy in recent years. 5,6 Percutaneous spinal endoscopy has certain advantages, like direct surgical vision, reduced trauma, and less hemorrhage. Comparable with open surgery, spinal endoscopy is well suited for the rapid post -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology