Taking climate-smart governance to the high seas

Catarina Frazão Santos,Tundi Agardy,Cassandra Brooks,Kristina M Gjerde,Cymie Payne,Lisa M Wedding,José C Xavier,Larry B Crowder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp4379

IF: 56.9

2024-05-17

Science

Abstract:Comprehensive spatial planning in international waters is key to achieving ocean sustainability.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Towards climate-smart, three-dimensional protected areas for biodiversity conservation in the high seas

Isaac Brito-Morales,David S. Schoeman,Jason D. Everett,Carissa J. Klein,Daniel C. Dunn,Jorge García Molinos,Michael T. Burrows,Kristine Camille V. Buenafe,Rosa Mar Dominguez,Hugh P. Possingham,Anthony J. Richardson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01323-7

IF: 30.7

2022-04-01

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:Nature Climate Change, Published online: 04 April 2022; doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01323-7Protecting the ocean from increasing threats requires the development of high-seas marine reserve networks. An approach that optimizes biodiversity, minimizes climate change exposure and reduces fisheries conflict enables low-regret climate-smart conservation areas to be identified.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Ocean Planning and Conservation in the Age of Climate Change: A Roundtable Discussion

C Frazão Santos,T Agardy,L B Crowder,J C Day,A Himes-Cornell,M L Pinsky,J M Reimer,E Gissi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obae037

2024-09-26

Abstract:Over recent years, recognition of the need to develop climate-smart marine spatial planning (MSP) has gained momentum globally. In this roundtable discussion, we use a question-and-answer format to leverage diverse perspectives and voices involved in the study of sustainable MSP and marine conservation under global environmental and social change. We intend this dialogue to serve as a stepping stone toward developing ocean planning initiatives that are sustainable, equitable, and climate-resilient around the globe.
A Study on the Governance Pathways of the Law of the Sea in Response to Climate Change

Wanping Zeng,Guihua Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1389169

IF: 5.247

2024-01-01

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:The legal systems for ocean governance and climate change governance are based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, respectively. However, due to differences in their negotiation backgrounds, legal scope, goals, and tasks, there is a lack of interaction between the two at the legal system level. The ocean plays a crucial role in regulating the Earth’s climate system, yet its value is often underestimated in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in addressing climate change. Specifically, we will examine the Convention’s ability to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and identify areas where it falls short, such as inadequate regulation of sea level rise, ocean acidification, and ocean fertilization. Based on this, proposals for governance paths from the perspective of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea include developing the Agreement relating to the climate change and ocean governance and reinterpreting the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in accordance with the Paris Agreement. The content should be adapted more flexibly to current climate change challenges, and provisions related to sea level rise and maritime boundaries should be reinterpreted to fill legal gaps. In addition, it is important to establish coordinated regulatory rules and framework agreements to address the issues of ocean fertilization and ocean acidification. Finally, to remedy the shortcomings in proving causation, scientific theories and due diligence obligations should be attributed. Through these measures, effective ocean law governance paths that address climate change can be explored.
To save the high seas, plan for climate change

Lee Hannah,Amy Irvine,Isaac Brito-Morales,Susanna Fuller,Tammy Davies,Derek Tittensor,Grace Reville,Nancy Shackell,Janos Hennicke,Ryan Stanley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01720-2

IF: 64.8

2024-06-13

Nature

Abstract:Species are already on the move as waters warm. Conservation plans need to take this into account. Species are already on the move as waters warm. Conservation plans need to take this into account.

multidisciplinary sciences
Policies for Potentially Inundated Island Nations for the Retention of Marine Resources and Rights of Associated Under-Water Features and Exclusive Economic Zones

Jian Chen,Yang Zhao,Taiming Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106786

IF: 4.295

2023-01-01

Ocean & Coastal Management

Abstract:Sea level rise is one of the primary drivers of global ecosystem change, with significant and far-reaching consequences for the social and natural environments of islands. The emphasis on maintaining marine resources, and the rights associated with underwater features and exclusive economic zones, has notably intensified for Small Island Developing States (SIDSs). Despite these states possessing legally secured rights to maritime zones, their inadequate capacity for marine governance could render them susceptible to rampant illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, as well as the tangible loss of these resources. Consequently, such approaches thus lack effectiveness to promote SIDSs’ adaptation to climate targets and the retention of marine resources. Therefore, this paper uses the coevolutionary framework to analyse the synergies among policies in SIDSs, from the perspective of institutional diversity. It summarises 107 policies into the categories of engineering, economy, cooperation, and education. Based on the results of this categorisation, the challenges and key trends underlying the implementation of such policies in SIDSs are explored. Two corresponding recommendations are developed, which include building island resilience based on acknowledging the diversity of environmental and social issues among SIDSs and promoting “learning-by-doing” in those SIDSs.
Solving the Crisis in Ocean Governance: Place-Based Management of Marine Ecosystems

Oran. R. Young,Gail Osherenko,Julia Ogden,Larry B. Crowder,John Ogden,James A. Wilson,Jon C. Day,Fanny Douvere,Charles N. Ehler,Karen L. McLeod,Benjamin S. Halperin,Robbin Peach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/envt.49.4.20-33

2007-01-01

Abstract:THERE is growing awareness that the escalating crisis in marine ecosystems-from biodiversity losses and transformed food webs to marine pollution and warming waters-is in large part a failure of governance. Problems arise from fragmentation in the governance systems used to manage specific human uses of marine resources, together with spatial and temporal mismatches between biophysical systems and the rights, rules, and decision making procedures created to manage human interactions with these systems. A practical way to solve this problem features place-based management-a strategy that calls for integrated management of the full suite of human activities occurring in spatially demarcated areas identified through a procedure that takes into account biophysical, socioeconomic, and jurisdictional considerations.
Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use

Natalie C. Ban,Nicholas J. Bax,Kristina M. Gjerde,Rodolphe Devillers,Daniel C. Dunn,Piers K. Dunstan,Alistair J. Hobday,Sara M. Maxwell,David M. Kaplan,Robert L. Pressey,Jeff A. Ardron,Edward T. Game,Patrick N. Halpin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12010

2013-02-22

Conservation Letters

Abstract:At the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio in June 2012, world leaders committed to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the high seas). Our analysis of gaps in high seas management indicates that a paradigm shift to a more systematic approach will be needed to safeguard high seas biodiversity from mounting threats. Experience from terrestrial and coastal areas indicates that a systematic approach to conservation planning and management can help to maintain ecosystem health and productivity while enabling sustainable use. Our analysis further demonstrates that the current legal regime on the high seas is insufficient to realize these objectives: management institutions have neither an adequate mandate for integrated planning nor the ability to effectively coordinate across multiple management regimes. We identify key elements for future high seas management and posit that a two‐pronged approach is most promising: the development of an improved global legal regime that incorporates systematic planning as well as the expansion of existing and new regional agreements and mandates. This combined approach is most likely to achieve the required ecosystem‐based, integrated and science‐based management that world leaders at Rio acknowledged should underpin ocean management.

biodiversity conservation
Navigating Shifting Regimes of Ocean Governance

Ana K. Spalding,Ricardo de Ycaza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2020.110102

2020-09-01

Environment and Society

Abstract:Recent decades have seen a rapid increase in the diversity of ocean uses and threats, leading to the Anthropocene ocean: a place fraught with challenges for governance such as resource collapse, pollution, and changing sea levels and ocean chemistry. Here we review shifts in ocean governance regimes from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the first legal regime for the global ocean, to Sustainable Development Goal 14 and beyond. This second period represents a merging of growing international interest in the ocean as part of the global sustainable development agenda—characterized by a focus on knowledge, collaboration, and the formation of alliances between diverse actors and institutions of environmental governance. To conduct this review, we analyzed literature on changing actors, regimes, and institutional arrangements for ocean governance over time. We conclude with a summary of challenges and opportunities for future ocean governance.
Fifteen years of lessons from the Seascape approach: A framework for improving ocean management at scale

Shannon E. Murphy,Ginny Farmer,Laure Katz,Sebastian Troëng,Scott Henderson,Mark V. Erdmann,Colleen Corrigan,Barry Gold,Christian Lavoie,Marco Quesada,María Claudia Díazgranados Cadelo,Ana Gloria Guzmán Mora,Enrique Nunez,Augustus Montebon,Semisi Meo,Susana Waqainabete‐Tuisese,Guilherme Dutra,Renata Pereira,Meity Mongdong,Ketut S. Putra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.423

2021-05-03

Conservation Science and Practice

Abstract:Abstract Seascapes are large, multiple‐use marine areas, defined scientifically and strategically, in which government authorities, private organizations, and other stakeholders cooperate to conserve the diversity and abundance of marine life and promote human well‐being. This approach has been applied by global nonprofit partnerships in five seascapes across eight countries and has drawn on the practical experience of more than 250 partners over 15 years. These experiences have helped define the Seascape approach, consisting of nine essential elements, for achieving effective ocean governance and management from local to regional levels. Lessons learned relate to using integrated planning frameworks, community‐led and locally owned initiatives, and a network of partners and a “backbone” organization for effective Seascape planning and design; promoting diversification in funding sources, private sector engagement, and the transition of nonprofit roles to ensure durability of a Seascape; and ensuring Seascape outcomes are measured through robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks and communicated effectively. Seascapes are unique in their ability to create a pathway toward sustainable development. To ensure support and amplification of the approach, they must align with diversified funding opportunities and global priorities outlined in international United Nations conventions focused on sustainable development and ocean health.

biodiversity conservation
Addressing ocean planning challenges in a highly crowded sea space: a case study for the regional sea of Catalonia (Western Mediterranean)

Daniel Depellegrin,Stefano Menegon,Andrej Abramic,Simón Aguado Hernandez,Francesca Larosa,Santiago Salvador,Carolina Marti Llambrich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16836.1

2024-03-01

Abstract:Background: This study performs an exploratory analysis of current-future sustainability challenges for ocean planning for the regional seas of Catalonia located in the Western Mediterranean (Spain). Methods: To address the challenges we develop an Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP)-oriented geodatabase of maritime activities and deploy three spatial models: 1) an analysis of regional contribution to the 30% protection commitment with Biodiversity Strategy 2030; 2) a spatial Maritime Use Conflict (MUC) analysis to address current and future maritime activities interactions and 3) the StressorGenerator QGIS application to locate current and anticipate future sea areas of highest anthropogenic stress. Results & conclusions: Results show that the i) study area is one of the most protected sea areas in the Mediterranean (44-51% of sea space protected); ii) anthropogenic stressors are highest in 1-4 nautical miles coastal areas, where maritime activities agglomerate, in the Gulf of Roses and Gulf of Saint Jordi. iii) According to the available datasets commercial fishery is causing highest conflict score inside protected areas. Potential new aquaculture sites are causing highest conflict in Internal Waters and the high potential areas for energy cause comparably low to negligible spatial conflicts with other uses. We discuss the added value of performing regional MSP exercises and define five challenges for regional ocean sustainability, namely: Marine protection beyond percentage, offshore wind energy: a new space demand, crowded coastal areas, multi-level governance of the regional sea and MSP knowledge gaps.
Smart Land Governance: Towards a Conceptual Framework

Hossein Azadi,Guy Robinson,Ali Akbar Barati,Imaneh Goli,Saghi Movahhed Moghaddam,Narges Siamian,Rando Vaernik,Rong Tan,Kristina Janeckova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030600

IF: 3.905

2023-01-01

Land

Abstract:Global environmental governance (GEG) is one of the world's major attempts to address climate change issues through mitigation and adaptation strategies. Despite a significant improvement in GEG's structural, human, and financial capital, the global commons are decaying at an unprecedented pace. Among the global commons, land has the largest share in GEG. Land use change, which is rooted in increasing populations and urbanization, has a significant role in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As a response, land governance and, consequently, good land governance, have arisen as normative concepts emerging from a series of success factors (notably economic development, environmental conservation, and social justice) to achieve greater sustainability. However, global land governance has shown little success in helping GEG due to the lack of intellectual and flexible thinking over governing the land sector. Consequently, reforming land governance "in a smart way" is one of the most critical actions that could contribute to achieving GEG goals. Hence, we propose a smart land governance (SLG) system that will be well addressed, understood, and modeled in a systemic and dynamic way. A smart system may be smart enough to adapt to different contexts and intellectual responses in a timely fashion. Accordingly, SLG is able to promote shared growth and solve many land sector problems by considering all principles of good land governance. Therefore, in order to enhance adaptive land governance systems, efficient land administration and management are required. This study's outcomes will raise the comprehension of the problems of land management, providing an excellent framework to help land planners and policy-makers, as well as the development of strategic principles with respect to the principal multidimensional components of SLG.
Polycentric Governance, Coordination and Capacity: The Case of Sargassum Influxes in the Caribbean

Sien van der Plank,Shelly-Ann Cox,Janice Cumberbatch,Robin Mahon,Bethia Thomas,Emma L. Tompkins,Jack Corbett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2078172

IF: 3.925

2022-06-11

Coastal Management

Abstract:The merits of polycentric climate governance have attracted considerable discussion. On the one hand, polycentric governance offers an alternative to top-down state-centric forms that have so far proven elusive. On the other, highly networked systems increase coordination challenges. Less attention has been paid to the varying capacities required to achieve coordination. In this article we explore the coordination of polycentric governance via a case study of sargassum influx management in the Caribbean. Since 2011, large quantities of sargassum seaweed have been washing up on Caribbean beaches with adverse socio-economic impacts. Our analysis of sargassum management policies reveals that a nascent polycentric system has generated significant cooperation in policy development and application across the region. However, there remain national capacity deficits to engage in this form of governance and to implement agreed actions. We conclude that advocates of a polycentric climate governance regime need to consider how capacity shapes participation, to the advantage of the largest and strongest. Polycentric governance can be useful for solving disparate cross-border environmental problems, but it also imposes a cost on the smallest that has thus far been unacknowledged and undertheorized.

environmental sciences,environmental studies
Governing the Arctic Ocean

Oran. R. Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.038

IF: 4.315

2016-01-01

Marine Policy

Abstract:The biophysical state change currently underway in the Arctic Ocean is opening up the region to new and intensified human activities. While the pace of development is not as rapid as many expected a few years ago, increased human activities are generating new needs for governance pertaining to the Arctic Ocean. The critical shortcomings of the existing arrangements applicable to this area arise from jurisdictional and sectoral fragmentation. A more effective governance system for the entire Arctic Ocean must rest on the constitutive foundation provided by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The toolkit provided by the law of the sea includes at least four distinct though not mutually exclusive approaches: (i) the application of specific provisions of UNCLOS (e.g. Arts. 122 and 123) to address emerging needs for governance in the Arctic Ocean, (ii) the development of UNCLOS implementing agreements that are applicable to the Arctic Ocean, (iii) the use of measures adopted by UN specialized agencies (e.g. IMO, FAO), and (iv) the creation of subsidiary bodies, such as regional fisheries management organizations or regional seas arrangements, tailored to the circumstances of the Arctic Ocean. A critical review of these approaches reveals their strengths and weaknesses as mechanisms for meeting emerging needs for governance in the Arctic Ocean. The way forward is likely to feature the development of a multi-functional arrangement that applies to human activities in the entire Arctic Ocean and that allows for distinct categories of members possessing different rights and responsibilities.
Towards Ecosystem-based Management of the Global Ocean: Strengthening Regional Cooperation through a New Agreement for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

I. Montes,Alexander Sen Gupta,P. Moore,J. Pearlman,N. Holbrook,M. Donat,H. Maske,Glen Wright,L. Alexander,G. Pitcher,K. Gjerde,T. Koslow,A. V. D. Plas,E. Pinto,W. Naqvi,O. Pizarro,D. Smale,K. Weng,F. Marsac,Melo R. Vito,M. Thomsen,L. Levin,K. Isensee,D. Shenoy,D. Gutiérrez,M. Hernández-Ayón,J. Benthuysen,S. Perkins‐Kirkpatrick,T. Wernberg,K. Rose,Baye Mbaye,A. Hobday

Abstract:to adopt measures to safeguard marine biodiversity and include a mechanism to enable and to require States to cooperate in good faith to achieve conservation objectives. The STRONG High Seas project is a five-year project that aims to strengthen regional ocean governance for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Working with the Secretariat of the Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS; Permanent Commission for the South Pacific) and the Secretariat of the West and Central Africa Regional Seas Programme (Abidjan Convention), the project will develop and propose targeted measures to support the coordinated development of integrated and ecosystem-based management approaches for ocean governance in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In this project, we carry out transdis-ciplinary scientific assessments to provide de-cision-makers, both in the target regions and globally, with improved knowledge and understanding on high seas biodiversity. We engage with stakeholders from governments, private sector, scientists and civil society to support the design of integrated, cross-sectoral approaches for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in the Southeast Atlantic and Southeast Pacific. We then facilitate the timely delivery of these proposed approaches for potential adoption into the relevant regional policy processes. To enable an interregional exchange, we further ensure dialogue with relevant stakeholders in other marine regions. To this end, we set up a regional stakeholder platform to facilitate joint learning and develop a community of practice. Finally, we explore links and opportunities for regional governance in a new international and legally-binding instrument on marine biodiversity in the high seas.

Biology,Political Science,Environmental Science
Review study on governance and international law for coastal and marine ecosystems in response to climate change: Social science perspective

Kailei Zhu,Jiayu Bai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2022.09.003

Abstract:As a common concern of humankind, the governance of coastal and marine ecosystems is increasingly coming to the fore of the international community as part of the joint response to climate change. Since the signing of the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea several decades ago, the international community has been exploring how international law can be improved in this respect. At present, the governance and international law of coastal and marine ecosystems in response to climate change are studied from theoretical and methodological perspectives. Extensive empirical studies help pinpoint specific issues related to each topic and provide valuable empirical references for both developed and developing countries. Based on social science publications, the authors use technical means to visualize research related to this topic, and conduct comprehensive reviews of these papers. They reveal that research based on these topics started late and is characterized by fragmentation. The research potential related to mentioned topic has yet to be explored extensively.
Building multiscalar sustainable ocean governance: How do global perspectives interact with the Portuguese national approach?

Cátia Miriam Costa,Ana Teresa Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28233

IF: 3.776

2024-04-03

Heliyon

Abstract:UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission launched the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development in 2021 to boost global and sustainable Ocean governance. The initiative resulted from historical and political dynamics at the global and lower political scales, with maritime environmental and economic concerns becoming more prominent in 2010. The Ocean Decade's pillars include science and research, sustainability, conservation, and bridging gaps for a global Ocean-Climate-Biodiversity nexus. The Sustainable Development Goals recognized the importance of oceans and marine resources, and the Ocean was officially perceived as a determining factor of Climate Change at CoP 21 in 2015. Portugal has built integrated and far-reaching policies for ocean governance, including significant involvement with an international perspective since the Lisbon World Exhibition in 1998. In addition, the national government established a Ministry of the Sea in 2015 to re-develop relations with its maritime space. This article analyzes and compares the discourse of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals reports and the Portuguese government programs (2005–2022) to explore the prominent trends in Portuguese Ocean governance discourse and how global and national perspectives interact. Through this case study, the research aims to develop insights into the multiscalar impacts of promoting global and sustainable Ocean governance and its interaction with national perspectives.
Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature

Katie K. Arkema,Gregory M. Verutes,Spencer A. Wood,Chantalle Clarke-Samuels,Samir Rosado,Maritza Canto,Amy Rosenthal,Mary Ruckelshaus,Gregory Guannel,Jodie Toft,Joe Faries,Jessica M. Silver,Robert Griffin,Anne D. Guerry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406483112

IF: 11.1

2015-06-15

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Significance Oceans and coasts provide people with diverse benefits, from fisheries that sustain lives and livelihoods to recreational opportunities that generate tourism. However, translating appreciation of these benefits into changes in management and policy is not trivial. We report on a ground-breaking effort to use ecosystem-service values and models within a coastal planning process. By accounting for spatial variation in the influence of human activities on services, our results allowed stakeholders and policymakers to refine zones of human use, reduce risk to ecosystems, and enhance delivery of multiple ocean and coastal benefits. Application of our approaches and tools will enable planners worldwide to bring ecosystem-service science to bear on real-world decisions, thus directing actions that protect ecosystems and their benefits for people.
Rethinking marine plastics pollution: Science diplomacy and multi-level governance

Macarena Beltran,Benny Tjahjono,Thomas Noto Suoneto,Rakyan Tanjung,Jorge Julião

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231183909

Abstract:Although science diplomacy has been gaining relevance in foreign policy to solve environmental challenges, critical questions concerning what different instruments mean under the term 'science diplomacy' and whether science diplomacy does contribute to the progress in solving environmental issues remain unanswered. We explore those questions by linking science diplomacy salient features through documentary analysis of international instruments addressing the plastics pollution in the ocean. We find that from a science diplomacy and multi-level governance perspective, the responsibilities and capabilities of emergent actors of cross-level governance are also important, leading to more attention being paid to changes in the role of national authorities, away from passive leadership to cross-cutting coalitions supported by the salient features of science diplomacy, and redefining dominant discursive approaches that have framed plastics waste. Points for practitioners: As a result of the cost and limitations of the current international mechanisms, there is currently no incentive for individual countries to take action against marine plastic pollution.Science diplomacy and multi-level governance can contribute to international cooperation, foreign policy and national strategies.Leading efforts to engage countries with fewer scientific and technological capabilities could benefit countries' foreign policy.
International Legal Framework for Joint Governance of Oceans and Fisheries: Challenges and Prospects in Governing Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) under Sustainable Development Goal 14

Shijun Zhang,Qian Wu,Muhammad Murad Zaib Butt,(Judge) Yan-Ming Lv,(Judge) Yan-E-Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062566

IF: 3.9

2024-03-21

Sustainability

Abstract:Sustainable Development Goal 14 (SDG 14) was launched in 2015 to provide an overarching governance framework for long-term sustainable ocean development. This research paper analyzes the extent to which global and regional organizations are coherent with SDG 14 under the existing frameworks of international law. This research paper further assessed Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) under the framework of the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and International Environmental Law (IEL) in the context of joint governance of ocean and fisheries as Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). According to its objectives, the research indicated that coherence across governing instruments should be increased for the governance of LMEs, leading to the development of a mechanism representing consistency with SDG 14. As a result, a mechanism that demonstrates the coherence of SDG 14 with Agenda—2030 is made, which indicates that, in order to govern fisheries and oceans as LMEs jointly, coherence among governing instruments must be increased. The conclusion followed SDG 14's recommended actions, which are sly in line with UNCLOS and IEL, although the current initiatives of the regional organizations should be updated.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Governing Arctic Seas: Sustainability in the Bering Strait and Barents Sea Regions

Oran R. Young,Paul Arthur Berkman,Alexander N. Vylegzhanin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25674-6_1

2020-01-01

Abstract:Some regions defined in biophysical terms are subject to shared authority and responsibility with regard to matters of governance. When such regions lie outside or beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, they constitute international spaces. Where they are subject to the jurisdiction of two or more states, they constitute shared spaces. Together, international spaces and shared spaces make up the domain of ecopolitical regions. Focusing on marine shared spaces, which we describe as regional seas, this book addresses issues of governance broadly defined, with a particular emphasis on the achievement of sustainability regarding human activities occurring in regional seas. We treat the Bering Strait Region and the Barents Sea Region as cases studies for an in-depth examination of this topic. In the process, we seek to contribute to understanding regarding the pursuit of sustainability in regional seas and ecopolitical regions more generally.

Taking climate-smart governance to the high seas

Towards climate-smart, three-dimensional protected areas for biodiversity conservation in the high seas

Ocean Planning and Conservation in the Age of Climate Change: A Roundtable Discussion

A Study on the Governance Pathways of the Law of the Sea in Response to Climate Change

To save the high seas, plan for climate change

Policies for Potentially Inundated Island Nations for the Retention of Marine Resources and Rights of Associated Under-Water Features and Exclusive Economic Zones

Solving the Crisis in Ocean Governance: Place-Based Management of Marine Ecosystems

Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use

Navigating Shifting Regimes of Ocean Governance

Fifteen years of lessons from the Seascape approach: A framework for improving ocean management at scale

Addressing ocean planning challenges in a highly crowded sea space: a case study for the regional sea of Catalonia (Western Mediterranean)

Smart Land Governance: Towards a Conceptual Framework

Polycentric Governance, Coordination and Capacity: The Case of Sargassum Influxes in the Caribbean

Governing the Arctic Ocean

Towards Ecosystem-based Management of the Global Ocean: Strengthening Regional Cooperation through a New Agreement for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

Review study on governance and international law for coastal and marine ecosystems in response to climate change: Social science perspective

Building multiscalar sustainable ocean governance: How do global perspectives interact with the Portuguese national approach?

Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature

Rethinking marine plastics pollution: Science diplomacy and multi-level governance

International Legal Framework for Joint Governance of Oceans and Fisheries: Challenges and Prospects in Governing Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) under Sustainable Development Goal 14

Governing Arctic Seas: Sustainability in the Bering Strait and Barents Sea Regions