Accuracy of chest x-ray screening of silica-exposed miners for tuberculosis

B Maboso,R I Ehrlich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae043
2024-07-29
Abstract:Background: The World Health Organization recommends systematic chest X-ray (CXR) screening for tuberculosis (TB) in silica-exposed workers. However, evidence on the accuracy of CXR screening in such populations is lacking. Aims: To measure the accuracy of CXR screening for active TB in silica-exposed miners, in a population with a high prevalence of silicosis, post-TB lung disease and HIV. Methods: A secondary analysis of data from a miner screening programme in Lesotho was undertaken. We measured the performance of CXR (in participants with and without cough) for 'abnormalities suggestive of TB' against Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert). The sample size was 2572 and positive Xpert prevalence was 3%. Results: CXR alone had high sensitivity (0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.99), but low specificity (0.41, 95% CI 0.39-0.42). Requiring cough and a positive CXR increased specificity (0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.81), resulting in reduced sensitivity (0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.52). There was no difference in CXR accuracy by HIV status. However, specificity was markedly reduced in the presence of silicosis (from 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.72, to 0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.04) or past TB history (from 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.62 to 0.27, 95% CI 0.25-0.29). Throughout, positive predictive value remained very low (5%) and negative predictive value very high (99%). Conclusions: CXR screening accurately identifies TB-negative CXRs in this population, but post-TB lung disease and silicosis would result in a high proportion of Xpert-negative referrals and an increased risk of unneeded empirical treatment. Adapted screening algorithms, practitioner training and digital access to previous mining CXRs are needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?