Abstract:Objective: Our primary aim was to identify radiomic ultrasound features that can distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses with solid ultrasound morphology, and primary invasive from metastatic solid ovarian masses, and to develop ultrasound-based machine learning models that include radiomics features to discriminate between benign and malignant solid adnexal masses. Our secondary aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of our radiomics models with that of the ADNEX model and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound examiner. Methods: This is a retrospective observational single center study. Patients with a histological diagnosis of an adnexal tumor with solid morphology at preoperative ultrasound examination performed between 2014 and 2021 were included. The patient cohort was split into training and validation sets with a ratio of 70:30 and with the same proportion of benign and malignant (borderline, primary invasive and metastatic) tumors in the two subsets. The extracted radiomic features belonged to two different families: intensity-based statistical features and textural features. Models to predict malignancy were built based on a random forest classifier, fine-tuned using 5-fold cross-validation over the training set, and tested on the held-out validation set. The variables used in model building were patient's age, and those radiomic features that were statistically significantly different between benign and malignant adnexal masses (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons) and assessed as not redundant based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. We describe discriminative ability as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and classification performance as sensitivity and specificity. Results: 326 patients were identified and 775 preoperative ultrasound images were analyzed. 68 radiomic features were extracted, 52 differed statistically significantly between benign and malignant tumors in the training set, and 18 features were selected for inclusion in model building. The same 52 radiomic features differed statistically significantly between benign, primary invasive malignant and metastatic tumors. However, the values of the features manifested overlap between primary malignant and metastatic tumors and did not differ statistically significantly between them. In the validation set, 25/98 tumors (25.5%) were benign, 73/98 (74.5%) were malignant (6 borderline, 57 primary invasive, 10 metastases). In the validation set, a model including only radiomics features had an AUC of 0.80, and 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity at its optimal risk of malignancy cutoff (68% based on Youden's index). The corresponding results for a model including age and radiomics features were 0.79, 86% and 56% (cutoff 60% based on Youden's method), while those of the ADNEX model were 0.88, 99% and 64% (at 20% malignancy cutoff). Subjective assessment had sensitivity 99% and specificity 72%. Conclusions: Even though our radiomics models had discriminative ability inferior to that of the ADNEX model, our results are promising enough to justify continued development of radiomics analysis of ultrasound images of adnexal masses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid ultrasound morphology

Machine learning and radiomics for segmentation and classification of adnexal masses on ultrasound

An explainable machine learning model to solid adnexal masses diagnosis based on clinical data and qualitative ultrasound indicators

Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification

Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study

Discriminating Between Benign and Malignant Solid Ovarian Tumors Based on Clinical and Radiomic Features of MRI.

External validation of ultrasound-based models for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in Italy: the prospective multicenter IOTA phase 6 study

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses

Ultrasound Radiomics‐Based Logistic Regression Model to Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules

A Machine Learning Model Based on Thyroid US Radiomics to Discriminate Between Benign and Malignant Nodules

Ultrasound radiomics-based artificial intelligence model to assist in the differential diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma and ovarian dermoid cyst

Radiomics analysis combining gray-scale ultrasound and mammography for differentiating breast adenosis from invasive ductal carcinoma

A Radiomic-based Machine Learning Algorithm to Reliably Differentiate Benign Renal Masses from Renal Cell Carcinoma

AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging

An Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Model to Distinguish Between Sclerosing Adenosis and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Clinical value of radiomics and machine learning in breast ultrasound: a multicenter study for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions

An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses

Radiomics in the characterization of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas at unenhanced CT: time to look beyond usual density metrics

Diagnosis of Ovarian Neoplasms Using Nomogram in Combination With Ultrasound Image-Based Radiomics Signature and Clinical Factors

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the Adnexa Model, Simple Rules Model, and Risk of Malignancy Index for Adnexal Masses in a Gynecological Oncology Centre in China