Abstract:Journal of Integrative Plant BiologyVolume 63, Issue 9 p. 1591-1594 EditorialFree Access The power and versatility of genome editing tools in crop improvement Lanqin Xia, Lanqin Xia Institute of Crop Sciences (ICS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, 100081 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKejian Wang, Kejian Wang State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJian-Kang Zhu, Corresponding Author Jian-Kang Zhu [email protected] Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China Correspondence: Jian-Kang Zhu ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author Lanqin Xia, Lanqin Xia Institute of Crop Sciences (ICS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, 100081 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKejian Wang, Kejian Wang State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJian-Kang Zhu, Corresponding Author Jian-Kang Zhu [email protected] Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China Correspondence: Jian-Kang Zhu ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author First published: 11 August 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13160Citations: 1AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Increasing world population, global climate change, decreased farmland, environmental pollution and ecological deterioration represent unprecedent challenges for crop production to ensure global food security (Hickey et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021a). It is estimated that by the year 2050, 50% more food is needed to feed the increasing population (Bailey-Serres et al., 2019). Thus, it is urgent to boost crop production by using cutting-edge technologies. Genome editing technologies have revolutionized the plant research field and offer great potential in crop improvement (Ma et al., 2015; Li et al., 2021b; Zhan et al., 2021). Of the several genome editing technologies, clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and its associated Cas protein (CRISPR/Cas), has become the dominant one in the past several years because it is simple, efficient and cost-effective. The CRISPR/Cas nuclease generates a double-stranded DNA break (DSB) at the target site in a specific gene locus in the crop genome, causing random indel mutations via the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathway in cells (Ma et al., 2015; Li et al., 2021b; Zhan et al., 2021) or DNA sequence replacement or insertion through the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway when a donor repair template (DRT) is available (Sun et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020). In addition, several nucleic acid deaminases have been fused with CRISPR/Cas nickase (nCas) (e.g., nCas9 (D10A) or nCas9 (H840A)) to achieve base editing. For example, cytidine deaminases and adenine deaminases can be fused with CRISPR/nCas9 (D10A) to generate cytosine and adenine base editors (CBEs and ABEs), which enable C∗G to T∗A and A∗T to G∗C transitions, respectively, in the target region of a specific gene (Li et al., 2017; Lu and Zhu, 2017; Ren et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2018). On the other hand, prime editor, which is engineered by fusing a mutated M-MLV-RT (Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase) to the C-terminus of a catalytically impaired Cas9 (H840A), and programmed with a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) composed of a single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the specific site, a reverse transcription (RT) template encoding the desired edit, and a primer-binding site (PBS), can introduce all 12 classes of single nucleotide substitutions as well as predefined small indels without the need for DSB or DRT (Li et al., 2020a, 2020b; Lin et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020a). Improving the editing efficiency, expanding the CRISPR toolkits and utilizing the CRISPR/Cas tools to improve crops are important for addressing the diverse challenges in crop production. In this Special Issue, we collected 10 articles to demonstrate the latest progress in crop genome editing, including improved base editing systems, expanded CRISPR toolbox, multiplex gene editing and the creation of novel rice, wheat, and maize germplasms. Many important agronomic traits are dictated by mutations of one or a few nucleotides. The CRISPR/Cas base editors such as the CBEs and ABEs generate base transitions and are therefore powerful tools for rapid and efficient crop improvements and directed evolution of agriculturally important genes in planta (for review, please see Bharat et al., 2020 and Zhan et al., 2021). However, the efficiencies of base editors, especially the ABEs, are generally not efficient enough to generate the homozygous base substitutions in one generation needed for crop improvement. In this issue, Wei et al. (2021) developed a high-efficiency adenine base editor, ABE8e in rice (rABE8e), by combining monomeric TadA8e, bis-bpNLS and codon optimization. The rABE8e editor substantially increased the editing efficiencies at NG-protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and NGG-PAM target sequences compared with ABEmax (Koblan et al., 2018). For most targets, rABE8e exhibited nearly 100% editing efficiency and high homozygous substitution rates within the editing window, especially at positions A5 and A6. Xu et al. (2021) developed a novel plant dual-base editor version 1 (pDuBE1) by integrating an eCDAL (Japanese lamprey cytidine deaminase CDA1-like 4) into TadA8e to generate an efficient plant dual cytosine and adenine editor in order to simultaneously introduce C-to-T and A-to-G substitutions. The editing efficiency of pDuBE1 reached at 87.6%, with frequencies of concurrent A-to-G and C-to-T conversions as high as 49.7% in stably transformed plant cells. Development of these highly efficient rABE8e and pDuBE1 systems will greatly facilitate the application of base editing in crop improvement and directed evolution of agriculturally important genes. In general, genome editing is constrained by PAM and/or the editing window. Development of Cas9 variants with broader PAM ranges is an important aspect in expanding the editing scope of the CRISPR/Cas system. The original Cas9 from Streptococcus canis (ScCas9) can recognize simple NNG-PAM targets, thus expanding the target range, but its editing efficiency is low in plants (Xu et al., 2020b). To expand the CRISPR toolbox, Liu et al. (2021) systematically investigated the targeted gene mutation frequencies and cytidine base editing efficiencies of ScCas9 and two evolved ScCas9 variants, ScCas9+ and ScCas9++ in rice (Oryza sativa). The authors generated a new CBE editor, PevoCDA1-ScCas9n++ with the evoBE4max structure and ScCas9n++, and achieved stable and efficient multiplex base editing efficiencies at NNG-PAM with wider editing windows without target sequence context preference. They found that ScCas9++ was more efficient than the original ScCas9 and ScCas9+. Using ScCas9++, they generated new rice germplasms by simultaneously editing OsWx and Badh2. Ma et al. (2021) also demonstrated that ScCas9++ enables broader genome editing compared to the original ScCas9, and ScCas9++-based ABE showed an editing efficiency comparable with that of Cas9-based ABE in transgenic rice plants. Furthermore, they generated many new OsGS1 alleles using the ScCas9++-based ABE, which will benefit future screens of rice germplasms with potential herbicide resistance. Cpf1 (also known as Cas12a) is a class 2 type V CRISPR/Cas DNA endonuclease that is smaller than Cas9 (Fonfara et al., 2016; Zetsche et al., 2017). Cpf1 recognizes T-rich PAM sequences such as the TTTN and can process Cpf1-associated CRISPR repeats into mature crRNAs that function as guides without requiring the trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) needed for the CRISPR/Cas9 system (Zetsche et al., 2017). Although CRISPR/LbCpf1 system (Cpf1 from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006) has been successfully applied in rice, maize and cotton (Wang et al., 2017, 2020; Li et al., 2018, 2019), large chromosomal segment deletions and multiplex gene editing by CRISPR/Cpf1 have not been documented in soybean. In this issue, Duan et al. (2021) reported the development of an efficient CRISPR/LbCpf1 system for multiplex gene editing and large chromosomal segment deletion in soybean (Glycine max). They demonstrated that their optimized system could reach an editing efficiency of 91.7% with a crRNA array comprising of a 21-nt direct repeat (DR) fused with a 22-nt guide RNA target. Eight gene targets could be edited simultaneously in one step using the system with eight guide RNA targets in a single crRNA array. Deletions of both large chromosomal segments with lengths of 10 Kb to 1 Mb and small fragments (<1 Kb) could be efficiently achieved in soybean using this multiplex gene editing system. These data suggest that the CRISPR/LbCpf1 system is robust and can provide significant benefits to soybean research and genetic improvement through multiplex gene editing or chromosome engineering. Rice is a major staple food crop consumed by nearly half of the world population. Each year, about 4.5 million hectares of rice are grown worldwide. Amylose content (AC), which is mainly regulated by the Waxy (Wx) gene, is a major indicator of rice eating and cooking quality (ECQ). Huang et al. (2021) generated a series of nucleotide substitutions in the middle region of the Wx gene using CBE and ABE. The ACs of the germplasm with novel Wx alleles ranged 0.3%–29.43%, whereas that of the wild-type is around 19.87%. Importantly, the waxyabe2 allele showed improved ECQ and favorable appearance without obvious undesirable agronomic traits. Besides, rice blast and bacterial blight are important diseases of rice (Oryza sativa) which are caused by the fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and the bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), respectively. Breeding rice varieties with broad-spectrum resistance is an effective strategy for sustainable rice production. Although dominant resistance genes have been extensively used in rice breeding, generating disease-resistant varieties by manipulating susceptibility (S) genes that facilitate pathogen compatibility has not been documented. In this issue, Tao et al. (2021) used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a series of loss-of-function mutants of the S genes Pi21 and Bsr-d1, which showed increased resistance to M. oryzae. They also generated a knockout mutant of the S gene Xa5 that showed increased resistance to Xoo. In particular, a triple mutant of all three S genes had significantly enhanced resistance to both M. oryzae and Xoo. Moreover, the triple mutant lines showed similar growth phenotypes and agronomic performance compared to the wild-type. Thus, simultaneous editing of multiple S genes is an effective strategy for generating new rice varieties with broad-spectrum resistance. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a major staple food crop consumed by more than 30% of the world population. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer has been applied extensively in agriculture to improve wheat yields. However, undue N fertilizer application and the low N use efficiency (NUE) of modern wheat varieties are exacerbating the problem of environmental pollution and ecological deterioration. An abnormal cytokinin response1 repressor1 (are1) mutant in rice exhibits increased NUE, and delayed senescence and consequently increased grain yields under N-limiting conditions (Wang et al., 2018). However, the function of ARE1 ortholog in wheat remains unknown. In this issue, Zhang et al. (2021) isolated and characterized three TaARE1 homeologs from an elite Chinese winter wheat cultivar ZhengMai 7698. The authors then used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis to generate a series of transgene-free mutant lines either with partial or triple-null taare1 alleles. All transgene-free mutant lines showed enhanced tolerance to N starvation, delayed senescence and increased grain yields under normal field conditions. In particular, the AABBdd and aabbDD mutant lines exhibited delayed senescence and significantly increased grain yields without growth defects compared to the wild-type control. These results demonstrate the potential to edit ARE1 orthologs to breed high-yield wheat, which may also be extended to other important cereal crops. Maize (Zea mays L.) is a major staple food and feed crop worldwide. Aroma is an important quality parameter for breeding in rice. 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2AP) is a key scent compound identified in fragrant rice. Lower activity of BETAINE ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 2 (BADH2) is associated with fragrance in natural germplasms of diverse plant species. However, no aromatic germplasm has been documented in maize. In this issue, Wang et al. (2021) characterized the two maize BADH2 homologs, ZmBADH2a and ZmBADH2b. They then generated zmbadh2a and zmbadh2b single mutants and the zmbadh2a-zmbadh2b double mutant in four inbred maize lines using CRISPR/Cas. A popcorn-like scent was noticeable in seeds from the double mutant but not from either the single mutant or wild type. They detected 2AP in fresh kernels and dried mature seeds from the double mutant lines at levels of 0.028 to 0.723 mg/kg. These results suggest that ZmBADH2a and ZmBADH2b function redundantly in 2AP biosynthesis in maize. The authors thus generated the world's first aromatic maize germplasm by simultaneously editing the two BADH2 genes. Finally, reporter-assisted CRISPR/Cas systems can facilitate the selection of transgene-free edited plants following genetic segregation. Yan et al. (2021) established the seed fluorescence reporter (SFR)-assisted CRISPR/Cas9 systems in maize by using the red fluorescent DsRED protein expressed in the endosperm (En-SFR/Cas9), embryos (Em-SFR/Cas9), or both tissues (Em/En-SFR/Cas9). These three SFRs showed distinct fluorescent patterns in the seed endosperm and embryo, allowing easy identification of transgene-free edited seeds following segregation. In summary, impressive progresses have been made in crop genome editing, from improving the editing efficiencies, expanding CRISPR toolkits and applying these tools to generate novel germplasms. This Special Issue covers a selected range of topics in this research area. Expanding the CRISPR toolboxes and improving editing efficiencies would make genome editing more useful in crop plants. The generation of novel crop germplasms, which is difficult or impossible through conventional breeding, demonstrates the power and versatility of genome editing in crop improvement for better food, increased yield, enhanced disease resistance, and higher resource use efficiency that are critical for sustainable agriculture and global food security. REFERENCES Bailey-Serres, J., Parker, J.E., Ainsworth, E.A., Oldroyd, G.E.D., and Schroeder, J.I. (2019). Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575: 109– 118. Bharat, S.S., Li, S., Li, J., Yan, L., and Xia, L. (2020). Base editing in plants: Current status and challenges. Crop J. 8: 384– 395. Duan, K., Cheng, Y., Ji, J., Wang, C., Wei, Y., and Wang, Y. (2021). Large chromosomal segment deletions by CRISPR/LbCpf1-mediated multiplex gene editing in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1620– 1631. Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovič, M., Le Rhun, A., and Charpentier, E. (2016). The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532: 517– 521. Hickey, L.T., N. Hafeez, A., Robinson, H., Jackson, S.A., Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M., Tester, M., Gao, C., Godwin, I.D., Hayes, B.J., and Wulff, B.B.H. (2019). Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat. Biotechnol. 37: 744– 754. Huang, X., Su, F., Huang, S., Mei, F., Niu, X., Ma, C., Zhang, H., Zhu, X., Zhu, J.-K., and Zhang, J. (2021). Novel Wx alleles generated by base editing for improvement of rice grain quality. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1632– 1638. Koblan, L.W., Doman, J.L., Wilson, C., Levy, J.M., Tay, T., Newby, G.A., Maianti, J.P., Raguram, A., and Liu, D.R. (2018). Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 36: 843– 846. Li, H.Y., Li, J.Y., Chen, J.L., Yan, L., and Xia, L.Q. (2020a). Precise modifications of both exogenous and endogenous genes in rice by prime editing. Mol. Plant 13: 671– 674. Li, J., Jiao, G., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Zhong, Y., Yan, L., Jiang, D., Ma, Y., and Xia, L. (2021b). Modification of starch composition, structure and properties through editing of TaSBEIIa in both winter and spring wheat varieties by CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19: 937– 951. Li, J., Li, H., Chen, J., Yan, L., and Xia, L. (2020b). Toward precision genome editing in crop plants. Mol. Plant 13: 811– 813. Li, J., Sun, Y., Du, J., Zhao, Y., and Xia, L. (2017). Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant 10: 526– 529. Li, S., Li, J., He, Y., Xu, M., Zhang, J., Du, W., Zhao, Y., and Xia, L. (2019). Precise gene replacement in rice by RNA transcript-templated homologous recombination. Nat. Biotechnol. 37: 445– 450. Li, S., Zhang, C., Li, J., Yan, L., Wang, N., and Xia, L. (2021a). Present and future prospects for wheat improvement through genome editing and advanced technologies. Plant Commun. 2: 100211. Li, S., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Guo, X., Wu, Z., Du, W., Zhao, Y., and Xia, L. (2018). Expanding the scope of CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated genome editing in rice. Mol. Plant 11: 995– 998. Lin, Q., Zong, Y., Xue, C., Wang, S., Jin, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Anzalone, A.V., Raguram, A., Doman, J.L., Liu, D.R., and Gao, C. (2020). Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38: 582– 585. Liu, T., Zeng, D., Zheng, Z., Lin, Z., Xue, Y., Li, T., Xie, X., Ma, G., Liu, Y.-G., and Zhu, Q. (2021). The ScCas9++ variant expands CRISPR toolbox for genome editing in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1611– 1619. Lu, Y., Tian, Y., Shen, R., Yao, Q., Wang, M., Chen, M., Dong, J., Zhang, T., Li, F., Lei, M., and Zhu, J.-K. (2020). Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 38: 1402– 1407. Lu, Y., and Zhu, J.-K. (2017). Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant 10: 523– 525. Ma, G., Kuang, Y., Lu, Z., Li, X., Xu, Z., Ren, B., Zhou, X., and Zhou, H. (2021). CRISPR/Sc++ -mediated genome editing in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1606– 1610. Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, Q., Liu, W., Chen, Y., Qiu, R., Wang, B., Yang, Z., Li, H., Lin, Y., Xie, Y., Shen, R., Chen, S., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Guo, J., Chen, L., Zhao, X., Dong, Z., and Liu, Y.-G. (2015). A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8: 1274– 1284. Ren, B., Yan, F., Kuang, Y., Li, N., Zhang, D., Zhou, X., Lin, H., and Zhou, H. (2018). Improved base editor for efficiently inducing genetic variations in rice with CRISPR/Cas9-guided hyperactive hAID mutant. Mol. Plant 11: 623– 626. Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Wu, C., He, Y., Ma, Y., Hou, H., Guo, X., Du, W., Zhao, Y., and Xia, L. (2016). Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase. Mol. Plant 9: 628– 631. Tang, X., Sretenovic, S., Ren, Q.R., Jia, X.Y., Li, M.K., Fan, T.T., Yin, D.S., Xiang, S.Y., Guo, Y.H., Liu, L., Zheng, X.L., Qi, Y.P., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Plant prime editors enable precise gene editing in rice cells. Mol. Plant 13: 667– 670. Tao, H., Shi, X., He, F., Wang, D., Xiao, N., Fang, H., Wang, R., Zhang, F., Wang, M., Li, A., Liu, X., Wang, G.-L., and Ning, Y. (2021). Engineering broad-spectrum disease-resistant rice by editing multiple susceptibility genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1639– 1648. Wang, M., Mao, Y., Lu, Y., Tao, X., and Zhu, J.-K. (2017). Multiplex gene editing in rice using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Mol. Plant 10: 1011– 1013. Wang, Q., Nian, J., Xie, X., Yu, H., Zhang, J., Bai, J., Dong, G., Hu, J., Bai, B., Chen, L., Xie, Q., Feng, J., Yang, X., Peng, J., Chen, F., Qian, Q., Li, J., and Zuo, J. (2018). Genetic variations in ARE1 mediate grain yield by modulating nitrogen utilization in rice. Nat. Commun. 9: 1– 10. Wang, Q., Alariqi, M., Wang, F., Li, B., Ding, X., Rui, H., Li, Y., Xu, Z., Qin, L., Sun, L., Li, J., Zou, J., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., and Jin, S. (2020). The application of a heat-inducible CRISPR/Cas12b (C2c1) genome editing system in tetraploid cotton (G. hirsutum) plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18: 2436– 2443. Wang, Y., Liu, X., Zheng, X., Wang, W., Yin, X., Liu, H., Ma, C., Niu, X., Zhu, J., and Wang, F. (2021). Creation of aromatic maize by CRISPR/Cas. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1664– 1670. Wei, C., Wang, C., Jia, M., Guo, H.-X., Luo, P.-Y., Wang, M.-G., Zhu, J.-K., and Zhang, H. (2021). Efficient generation of homozygous substitutions in rice in one generation utilizing an rABE8e base editor. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1595– 1599. Xu, R., Kong, F., Qin, R., Li, J., Liu, X., and Wei, P. (2021). Development of an efficient plant dual cytosine and adenine editor. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1600– 1605. Xu, W., Zhang, C., Yang, Y., Zhao, S., Kang, G., He, X., Song, J., and Yang, J. (2020a). Versatile nucleotides substitution in plant using an improved prime editing system. Mol. Plant 13: 675– 678. Xu, Y., Meng, X., Wang, J., Qin, B., Wang, K., Li, J., Wang, C., and Yu, H. (2020b). ScCas9 recognizes NNG protospacer adjacent motif in genome editing of rice. Sci. China: Life Sci. 63: 450– 452. Yan, F., Kuang, Y., Ren, B., Wang, J., Zhang, D., Lin, H., Yang, B., Zhou, X., and Zhou, H. (2018). Highly efficient A·T to G·C base editing by Cas9n-guided tRNA adenosine deaminase in rice. Mol. Plant 11: 631– 634. Yan, Y., Zhu, J., Qi, X., Cheng, B., Liu, C., and Xie, C. (2021). Establishment of an efficient seed fluorescence reporter-assisted CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in maize. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1671– 1680. Zetsche, B., Heidenreich, M., Mohanraju, P., Fedorova, I., Kneppers, J., DeGennaro, E.M., Winblad, N., Choudhury, S.R., Abudayyeh, O.O., Gootenberg, J.S., Wu, W.Y., Scott, D.A., Severinov, K., van der Oost, J., and Zhang, F. (2017). Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR–Cpf1 using a single crRNA array. Nat. Biotechnol. 35: 31– 34. Zhan, X., Lu, Y., Zhu, J.-K., and Botella, J.R. (2021). Genome editing for plant research and crop improvement. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 3– 33. Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Li, S., Li, J., Yan, L., and Xia, L. (2021). Increasing yield potential through manipulating of an ARE1 ortholog related to nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by CRISPR/Cas9. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63: 1649– 1663. Citing Literature Volume63, Issue9Special Issue: Genome Editing in PlantsSeptember 2021Pages 1591-1594 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Abstract:Plant Biotechnology JournalVolume 17, Issue 9 p. 1697-1699 LetterOpen Access Optimizing base editors for improved efficiency and expanded editing scope in rice Mugui Wang, Mugui Wang orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-086X Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaThese authors contributed equally to this article.Search for more papers by this authorZhidan Wang, Zhidan Wang Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaThese authors contributed equally to this article.Search for more papers by this authorYanfei Mao, Yanfei Mao Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYuming Lu, Yuming Lu Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorRuifang Yang, Ruifang Yang Crop Breeding and Cultivation Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaoping Tao, Xiaoping Tao Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJian-Kang Zhu, Corresponding Author Jian-Kang Zhu jkzhu@purdue.edu orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-731X Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USACorrespondence (Tel +86 21 57078201; fax +86 21 54920717; email: jkzhu@purdue.edu)Search for more papers by this author Mugui Wang, Mugui Wang orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-086X Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaThese authors contributed equally to this article.Search for more papers by this authorZhidan Wang, Zhidan Wang Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaThese authors contributed equally to this article.Search for more papers by this authorYanfei Mao, Yanfei Mao Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYuming Lu, Yuming Lu Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorRuifang Yang, Ruifang Yang Crop Breeding and Cultivation Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaoping Tao, Xiaoping Tao Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJian-Kang Zhu, Corresponding Author Jian-Kang Zhu jkzhu@purdue.edu orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-731X Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USACorrespondence (Tel +86 21 57078201; fax +86 21 54920717; email: jkzhu@purdue.edu)Search for more papers by this author First published: 08 April 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13124Citations: 42 AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Dear Editor, Base editors, presently including cytidine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs), enable precise base alterations in the genome without inducing DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs). Base editors are valuable tools for precision plant molecular breeding since many agronomic traits are controlled by variations in one or few DNA bases. The early developed CBE and ABE systems, consisting of the rat cytidine deaminase APOBEC1 (rAPOBEC1) or activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) PmCDA1, and the evolved tRNA adenine deaminase TadA, respectively, have been applied to many plant species. To improve the base editing efficiency, more effective cytidine deaminases such as the human APOBEC3A have been tested (Zong et al., 2018). On the other hand, for expanding the base editing scope in plants, several SpCas9 and SaCas9 variants such as VQR-Cas9, VRER-Cas9 and SaKKH-Cas9 that recognize PAMs other than the canonical NGG motif were introduced into the CBE and ABE toolbox (Hua et al., 2018a; Qin et al., 2018). However, relative to the widely used CRISPR/Cas gene editing technologies for inducing DSBs and subsequent repair-caused mutations, the efficiency of base editing is still low. In addition, base editors reported thus far are constrained by recognition of only a few kinds of PAM sequences. We have previously reported the initial adoption of CBEs and ABEs in rice (Hua et al., 2018b; Lu and Zhu, 2017). In our CBE system, we fused rAPOBEC1 to the N-terminus of SpCas9 nickase (Cas9n, D10A) using the unstructured 16-residue peptide XTEN as linker. A traditional nuclear localization signal, SV40 NLS peptide, was added to the C-terminus of the Cas9n. Two agronomically important genes of rice, NRT1.1B and SLR1, were selected for editing by this CBE system. However, the base substitution efficiencies were low, with only 2.7% for NRT1.1B and 13.3% for SLR1, respectively (Lu and Zhu, 2017). In our ABE system, we synthesized wild-type ecTadA and its mutant form ecTadA*7.10 and linked them together using a 32-amino acid (aa) linker; the resulting recombinant protein was fused to the N-terminus of the SpCas9 or SaCas9 nickase with the same linker. Testing at different targets showed that the base substitution efficiencies ranged from 5% to 60%, with most of the target sites having efficiencies lower than 30% as reported by other groups (Hua et al., 2018b). Recently, Koblan et al. (2018) found that the expression levels of base editors are major bottlenecks for base editing efficiency. They improved BE4 and ABE7.10 base editors by adopting bipartite nuclear localization signals (bpNLS), optimizing codon usage and ancestral reconstruction of the deaminase component. The resulting BE4max, AncBE4max and ABEmax editors showed increased editing efficiencies in a variety of settings, especially under suboptimal conditions or at sites previously edited with low efficiencies (Koblan et al., 2018). To improve the base editing efficiency in plants, we directly adopted the above GenScript codon-optimized nucleotide sequences of bpNLS-Anc689 APOBEC-32 aa Linker and bpNLS-adenine deaminase of ABE7.10-32 aa Linker into our previous CBE and ABE editors, resulting in Anc689BE4max and ABEmax, respectively (Figure 1a,b). Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Optimizing base editors for improved efficiency and expanded editing scope in rice. (a and b) Constructs of the Anc689BE4max (a) and ABEmax (b) base editors. Optimized ABE7.10 refers to the GenScript codon-optimized sequence of adenine deaminase of ABE7.10; this sequence and Anc689APOBEC were directly derived from Koblan et al. (2018). (c,g) Frequencies of base substitutions at the target sites of NRT1.1B (c) and SLR1 (g); the PAM motif is marked in box. (d,h,l) Distribution of the genotypes from transgenic rice plantlets edited at the NRT1.1B (d), SLR1 (h) and ALS (l) target sites. Ho: homozygous, Bi: biallelic, He: heterozygous, WT: wild type, Other: other base substitutions but not C->T. N: the total number of identified plantlets. (e,f) Phenotype of the regenerated rice plantlets from base editing at SLR1. Scale bar equal to 1 cm. (i,o,q) Representative Sanger sequencing chromatograms at the SLR1 (i), ALS (o) and EPSPS (q) target sites. The plant ID (#), genotype and its base substitution status are shown above each chromatogram. The superscript indicates the base position within protospacer. The substituted bases are also marked by red arrows, and their positions in the gene are indicated in number. The PAM motif is marked in box. Ho: homozygous, Bi: biallelic, He: heterozygous, WT: wild type. (j) The target sites designed for base editing at the ALSS627N of rice. The sgRNA-PAM sequences designed for Anc689BE4max-nCas9 and Anc689BE4max-nCas9NG are underlined in blue and red, respectively, and the PAM motif is marked in bold. The intended base and amino acid for substitution are marked in pink. (k,m) Frequencies of base substitutions at the target sites of ALS-sg1 (k) and ALS-sg2 (m). The PAM motif is marked in box, and the red triangles indicate the intended base for conversion. (n) Phenotype of the transgenic rice plantlets treated by herbicide. 0.03% Imazethapyr (Shandong CYNDA) was sprayed on the plantlets, and the photograph was taken 25 days after treatment. Scale bar equal to 1 cm. (p) Wild type and the mutated sequences of EPSPS. The designed sgRNA-PAM sequences are underlined, and the PAM motif is further marked in bold. The intended base and amino acid before and after editing are marked in blue and pink, respectively. The quantity of each genotype from transgenic plantlets is indicated by ×. s1, single nucleotide substitution mutation; s2, two nucleotides substitution mutation, WT, wild type. (r) Frequencies of base substitutions at the target site of ALS-sg3 edited by ABE and ABEmax. The PAM motif is marked in box. (s,t) Summary of editing efficiencies for different base editors. Base editing efficiency was calculated by scoring the number of plantlets with anticipated base substitution within the target site relative to the total number of identified transgenic plantlets. The designed sgRNA-PAM sequences for EPSPS-sg2 and ALS-sg4 are 5′-GAGAAGGATGCGAAAGAGGAAGT and 5′-TAACAAAGAAGAGTGAAGTCCGT, respectively. To directly compare the performance of Anc689BE4max with our previous CBE, the NRT1.1B and SLR1 were selected for editing using the previously tested sgRNA. As shown in Figure 1c, 72.4% of the transgenic rice lines harboured the target C to T replacement at NRT1.1B target site, and 76.2% of these lines (55.2% of total transgenic lines) are homozygous (Figure 1d). Most of the regenerated plantlets transformed with Anc689BE4max-sgRNASLR1 displayed an obvious dwarf phenotype (Figure 1e,f). Genotyping and sequencing results showed that 82.8% of the transgenic lines converted C to T at their target site, and 72.5% of the transgenic lines were homozygous or biallelic C to T substitutions (Figure 1g,h). The sequencing results are also consistent with the phenotype of each plantlet (Figure 1f,i). Compared with the efficiency of 2.7% for NRT1.1B and 13.3% for SLR1 from our previous CBE (Lu and Zhu, 2017), the Anc689BE4max showed much higher base editing efficiencies. We also noticed that the deamination window ranged from the 4th to 15th target bases, but the substitutions were concentrated at the 4th to 7th bases, which is similar to our previously reported CBE (Lu and Zhu, 2017). To further evaluate the efficiency of Anc689BE4max, we designed an sgRNA (ALS-sg1) for modifying the acetolactate synthase gene (ALS) in rice. It is known that a mutated form of ALS, ALSS627N (G1880 to A in Nipponbare DNA sequence), confers tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides (Piao et al., 2018) (Figure 1j). Similar to the results from the base editing of NRT1.1B and SLR1, 71.4% of the transgenic lines contained C to T substitution at their target site in ALS, and most of them were homozygous or biallelic (Figure 1k,l). Our result also shows that although the target C ranging from 4th to 10th of the protospacer could be replaced by T, the substitution preferentially occurred within the window from the 5th to 7th base. Only two of the edited lines contained the intended G1880 to A conversion, since this target base is located outside of the ‘hot spot’ of the deamination window (Figure 1k). Recently, Nishimasu et al. (2018) reported that a rationally engineered SpCas9 variant, SpCas9-NG, containing the R1335A/L1111R/D1135V/G1218R/E1219F/A1322R/T1337R seven amino acid alteration, can recognize relaxed NG PAMs in human cells. During the preparation of our manuscript, Endo et al. (2018) reported that the nickase of this variant (D10A) fused to cytidine deaminases such as PmCDA1 and rAPOBEC1 could mediate C to T conversion at sites bearing NG PAMs in rice calli, but the nSpCas9NG-APOBEC1 base editor showed a low activity at most of the tested target sites. To expand the access range of base editors, we adopted the SpCas9NG nickase into our Anc689BE4max and ABEmax to replace the SpCas9 nickase, resulting in Anc689BE4max-nCas9NG and ABEmax-nCas9NG system, respectively (Figure 1a,b). Testing of the Anc689BE4max-nCas9NG system at SLR1 using the same sgRNA with GGG PAM showed an editing efficiency of 40.9%, lower than that of Anc689BE4max-nCas9 (Figure 1s). To facilitate the G1880 to A substitution in ALS, we designed another sgRNA, ALS-sg2, harbouring the AGC PAM, for editing by the Anc689BE4max-nCas9NG system (Figure 1j). 57.1% of the transgenic lines showed the intended G1880 to A replacement, although the combined base substitution efficiency was lower than that of Anc689BE4max-nCas9 with ALS-sg1 (Figure 1m,s). The mutants homozygous for the G1880 to A substitution were tolerant to imidazolinone herbicide, whereas wild-type plants were not (Figure 1n,o). Taking advantage of the nCas9NG-derived base editor that can recognize relaxed PAMs, we further applied it to modify the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene. Previous work showed that a single base transition of C317-T within OsEPSPS (C530 in Nipponbare genome), changing proline-106 to leucine (P106L), led to resistance to another herbicide, glyphosate, in the EPSPS-deficient Escherichia coli strain AB2829 (Zhou et al., 2006). Here, we designed an sgRNA harbouring the TGA PAM (EPSPS-sg1) for editing by our Anc689BE4max-nCas9NG system, since there are no suitable NGG PAMs near the protospacer (Figure 1p). We successfully obtained five plantlets containing the targeted C530 to T replacement from 29 transgenic lines (Figure 1p,q,s). The glyphosate tolerance will be tested in the T1 generation since there was no homozygous mutant in the T0 plants. To evaluate the activity of our ABEmax editor, we designed a third sgRNA (ALS-sg3) to edit the ALS gene by ABEmax and our previous ABE side by side. The results showed that ABEmax doubled the editing efficiency of ABE (Figure 1r,t). We further tested ABEmax at the ALS-sg1 target site, and the results showed that 48.3% of the transgenic lines harboured A to G substitution (Figure 1t). The general editing efficiencies of ABEmax seem lower than those of Anc689BE4max (Figure 1s,t). We further evaluated the ABEmax-nCas9NG system with non-canonical NGG PAMs. Testing at the EPSPS-sg2 target site harbouring the AGT PAM showed an editing efficiency of 41.2%. However, testing at another target site (ALS-sg4) bearing the CGT PAM showed the editing efficiency lower than 10% (Figure 1t). In summary, our upgraded base editors not only show substantially increased editing efficiencies, but also have expanded editing scopes compared to previously reported CBEs and ABEs. These improved base editors are more powerful tools for molecular breeding of crops, although more plant species and more target sites need to be tested in the future. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to this work. References Endo, M., Mikami, M., Endo, A., Kaya, H., Itoh, T., Nishimasu, H., Nureki, O. et al. (2018) Genome editing in plants by engineered CRISPR-Cas9 recognizing NG PAM. Nature Plants, 5, 14– 17. Hua, K., Tao, X. and Zhu, J. (2018a) Expanding the base editing scope in rice by using Cas9 variants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 499– 504. Hua, K., Tao, X., Yuan, F., Wang, D. and Zhu, J.K. (2018b) Precise A.T to G.C base editing in the rice genome. Mol. Plant, 11, 627– 630. Koblan, L.W., Doman, J.L., Wilson, C., Levy, J.M., Tay, T., Newby, G.A., Maianti, J.P. et al. (2018) Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 843– 846. Lu, Y. and Zhu, J.K. (2017) Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant, 10, 523– 525. Nishimasu, H., Shi, X., Ishiguro, S., Gao, L., Hirano, S., Okazaki, S., Noda, T. et al. (2018) Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science, 361, 1259– 1262. Piao, Z., Wang, W., Wei, Y., Zonta, F., Wan, C., Bai, J., Wu, S. et al. (2018) Characterization of an acetohydroxy acid synthase mutant conferring tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in rice (Oryza sativa). Planta, 247, 693– 703. Qin, R., Li, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Miao, Y., Zhang, X. et al. (2018) Developing a highly efficient and wildly adaptive CRISPR-SaCas9 toolset for plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 706– 708. Zhou, M., Xu, H., Wei, X., Ye, Z., Wei, L., Gong, W., Wang, Y. et al. (2006) Identification of a glyphosate-resistant mutant of rice 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase using a directed evolution strategy. Plant Physiol. 140, 184– 195. Zong, Y., Song, Q., Li, C., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Wang, Y., Qiu, J. et al. (2018) Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 950– 953. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue9September 2019Pages 1697-1699 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation

Diverse nucleotide substitutions in rice base editing mediated by novel TadA variants

Exploring C-to-G and A-to-Y Base Editing in Rice by Using New Vector Tools

High-efficiency and multiplex adenine base editing in plants using new TadA variants

High performance TadA-8e derived cytosine and dual base editors with undetectable off-target effects in plants

Fusion of a rice endogenous N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase to a plant adenine base transition editor ABE8e enables A-to-K base editing in rice plants

Efficient and Heritable A-to-K Base Editing in Rice and Tomato

Improved plant cytosine base editors with high editing activity, purity, and specificity

Simplified Adenine Base Editors Improve Adenine Base Editing Efficiency in Rice.

Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion

Efficient generation of homozygous substitutions in rice in one generation utilizing an rABE8e base editor

Expanding the base editing scope in rice by using Cas9 variants.

Expanding the Editing Window of Cytidine Base Editors With the Rad51 DNA-Binding Domain in Rice

Exploring C-To-G Base Editing in Rice, Tomato, and Poplar

A large-scale genome and transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the mutation landscapes induced by high-activity adenine base editors in plants

Rationally Designed APOBEC3B Cytosine Base Editors with Improved Specificity

The Power and Versatility of Genome Editing Tools in Crop Improvement

Precise A·T to G·C Base Editing in the Rice Genome.

Optimizing Base Editors for Improved Efficiency and Expanded Editing Scope in Rice

Re-engineering the adenine deaminase TadA-8e for efficient and specific CRISPR-based cytosine base editing

Developing Guanine Base Editors for G-to-T Editing in Rice.

Rapid Vector Construction and Assessment of BE3 and Target-AID C to T Base Editing Systems in Rice Protoplasts