Abstract:Key points A central and unresolved question is how spinal motor neurons are controlled to generate movement; We decoded the spiking activities of dozens of spinal motor neurons innervating six muscles during a multi‐joint task, and we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of motor neurons based on their correlated activity (considered as common input); The vast majority of the identified motor neurons shared common inputs with other motor neuron(s); Groups of motor neurons were partly decoupled from their innervated muscle, such that motor neurons innervating the same muscle did not necessarily receive common inputs. Conversely, some motor neurons from different muscles ‐ including distant muscles ‐ received common inputs. It supports the theory that movement is produced through the control of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. Movements are reportedly controlled through the combination of synergies that generate specific motor outputs by imposing an activation pattern on a group of muscles. To date, the smallest unit of analysis of these synergies has been the muscle through the measurement of its activation. However, the muscle is not the lowest neural level of movement control. In this human study (n = 10), we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of motor neurons based on their correlated activity during an isometric multi‐joint task. Specifically, high‐density surface electromyography recordings from six lower limb muscles were decomposed into motor neurons spiking activity. We analyzed these activities by identifying their common low‐frequency components, from which networks of correlated activity to the motor neurons were derived and interpreted as networks of common synaptic inputs. The vast majority of the identified motor neurons shared common inputs with other motor neuron(s). In addition, groups of motor neurons were partly decoupled from their innervated muscle, such that motor neurons innervating the same muscle did not necessarily receive common inputs. Conversely, some motor neurons from different muscles – including distant muscles – received common inputs. Our study supports the theory that movements are produced through the control of small numbers of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. We provide a new neural framework for a deeper understanding of the structure of common inputs to motor neurons. figure legend Ten participants performed an isometric multi‐joint task, which consisted in producing force on an instrumented pedal. Adhesive grids of 64 electrodes were placed over six lower limb muscles (gastrocnemius medialis [GM] and lateralis [GL], vastus lateralis [VL] and medialis [VM], biceps femoris [BF], semitendinosus [ST]). The high‐density EMG signals were decomposed into motor unit spike trains. For each pair of motor neurons, we assessed the correlation between their smoothed discharge rates to determine whether they shared common input. Then, we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of common inputs and we applied a clustering procedure to group the motor neurons according to their positions in the graph (i.e., their correlated activity). Results support the theory that movement is produced through the control of small numbers of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Inverting a model of neuromuscular control to estimate descending activation patterns that generate fast-reaching movements

Estimating descending activation patterns from EMG in fast and slow movements using a model of the stretch reflex

Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling

An α-MN collateral to γ-MNs can mitigate velocity-dependent stretch reflexes during voluntary movement: A computational study

Analysis of an Optimal Control Model of Multi-Joint Arm Movements

The concepts of muscle activity generation driven by upper limb kinematics

Theoretical limits on the speed of learning inverse models explain the rate of adaptation in arm reaching tasks

Muscle Activation Patterns During Two Types of Voluntary Single-Joint Movement

Dimensionality of joint torques and muscle patterns for reaching

A computational study of how an α- to γ-motoneurone collateral can mitigate velocity-dependent stretch reflexes during voluntary movement

Correlation networks of spinal motor neurons that innervate lower limb muscles during a multi‐joint isometric task

Personalized Alpha-Motoneuron Pool Models Driven by Neural Data Encode the Mechanisms Controlling Rate of Force Development

Changes in high-frequency neural inputs to muscles during movement cancellation

Neuro-musculoskeletal modeling reveals muscle-level neural dynamics of adaptive learning in sensorimotor cortex

Changes in Muscle Synergy Structure and Activation Patterns Underlie Force Field Adaptation, Retention, and Generalization

Inverse Estimation of Multiple Muscle Activations From Joint Moment With Muscle Synergy Extraction

Rapid Feedback Responses Parallel the Urgency of Voluntary Reaching Movements

Evaluation of linear and non-linear activation dynamics models for insect muscle

Optimal Control of Antagonistic Muscle Stiffness During Voluntary Movements.

Muscle Excitation Estimation in Biomechanical Simulation Using NAF Reinforcement Learning

From thinking fast to moving fast: motor control of fast limb movements in healthy individuals