Technoeconomics and carbon footprint of hydrogen production
Jimmy Rojas,Shang Zhai,Eddie Sun,Vasudev Haribal,Sebastian Marin-Quiros,Amitava Sarkar,Raghubir Gupta,Matteo Cargnello,Will Chueh,Arun Majumdar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.292
IF: 7.2
2023-07-12
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Abstract:Decarbonization of the global economy needs not only carbon-free electricity but also a fuel that is free of greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen is a prime candidate, with colors such as gray, blue and green production methods receiving attention. Generally missing from this discourse, however, is a quantitative comparison on the cost, scale, carbon footprint and infrastructure requirements for each of these technologies. Here we present a detailed technoeconomic comparison of five hydrogen production technologies: thermochemical water splitting, methane pyrolysis , water electrolysis, steam methane reforming, and chemical looping hydrogen production. Steam or autothermal methane reforming with carbon capture (SMR + CC) at large scale sets the benchmark for costs, but at small scales, electrochemical technologies appear more suitable. Potentially competitive with and sometimes more affordable than SMR + CC are chemical looping hydrogen production and methane pyrolysis. The impacts of the CO 2 footprint of the electricity grid and a price on CO 2 are also quantitatively evaluated. A qualitative consideration of the ability to leverage existing infrastructure is also offered with a view towards rapid scalability. Finally, the key research needs are identified for each technology.
energy & fuels,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical