Effect of Object on Kinesthetic Motor Imagery in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study Based on Eye-Tracking Methodology
Ying Liu,Jinsheng Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s435258
IF: 2.989
2024-01-25
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Abstract:Ying Liu, Jinsheng Hu Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Jinsheng Hu, Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, No. 850 Huanghe Road Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China, Email Introduction: Social disturbance is a significant autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptom. Action representation, which is a fundamental component of social interaction, can be investigated through kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI). KMI has been commonly studied with the well-developed laterality judgment paradigm, wherein participants are required to discriminate the laterality of a hand rotated by different angles along one or more axes. Here, we investigated the KMI processing in individuals with ASD by hand laterality judgment paradigm with eye-tracking methodology. Methods: The current study included 22 participants with ASD and 22 typical developing (TD) peers matched for age, gender, and intelligence. Participants were asked to judge the laterality of hand-with-tooth brush images. Results: Compared to the TD controls, individuals with ASD performed KMI with lower accuracy and longer response time in both correct and incorrect action conditions. The incorrect action representation had greater effect on KMI for individuals with ASD. Differences in eye-movement patterns were also observed, characterized by individuals with ASD were more focused on the object area while TD peers were more focused on the hand area. Conclusion: Results suggest that while altered KMI performance was observed, the incorrect action representation elicited more engagement of KMI in both groups. The object-centered eye-movement pattern may contribute to the refine of motor simulation intervention for individuals with ASD. Keywords: autism spectrum disorder, kinesthetic motor imagery, action representation, eye-tracking Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder mainly characterized by deficits in social communication and repetitive stereotyped behaviors. 1 Much of how we think about others' actions, and in turn engage in social interaction, arises from the activation or simulation of our own action representations. 2 Action representation, which is a fundamental component of conceptualizing one's own and others' actions, it can be activated through observation of others' behaviour, 3 or by imagining one's own or others' actions. 4 Nonetheless, due to the lack of active manipulation of action representation in passive action observation tasks, kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI), a mental simulation of a body movement without actual motor output through internal embodiment of action representation, appears to be an appropriate alternative to study the internal embodiment of action representation. 5 KMI shares similar neural mechanism and temporal dynamics with motor execution. The time course of KMI is highly correlated with the time taken to motor execute. 6 Exercise imagination and exercise execution both appears to increase heart rate and breathing rate due to similar autonomic nerve activity. 7 The main motor cortex (M1/S1), premotor area (PMA), supplementary motor area (SMA), and other brain areas work together to produce KMI and motor execution. 8 Generally, KMI can induces higher activations in motor-related areas than passive action observation. 9 KMI has been commonly studied with the well-developed hand laterality judgement paradigm, which requires participants to choose whether a stimulus presented from different angles is a left or a right hand, is typically used to test KMI. 10 The engagement of KMI can be demonstrated by two key metrics. One is the angle effect of reaction time (RT) which states that as the stimulus rotation angle increases, so does the accuracy. The second is the biomechanical effects of the RTs. In the comfortable position, the hand rotates toward the body's center line, whereas in the awkward position, the hand rotates away from the center line. Participants are faster and more accurate in judging hand in physiologically comfortable positions than hand in awkward positions. 11 A number of studies have suggested dysfunctional KMI in ASD. Conson et al employed left or right hands portrayed from back at 0° (upright), 90° (clockwise), 180° (upside down) or 270° (90°anticlockwise) orientations as the stimulus materials for the hand laterality judgement test. 12 The findings demonstrated that whereas the AS (Asperger syndrome) group did not exhibit biomechanical effects, the typical development participants did. The AS group performed worse on the test and took longer to respond, showing KMI im -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,clinical neurology