Inactivity-induced phrenic motor facilitation requires PKCζ activity within phrenic motor neurons

Nathan A Baertsch,Alexandria B Marciante,Gordon S Mitchell,Tracy L Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00138.2024

2024-06-01

Abstract:Prolonged inhibition of respiratory neural activity elicits a long-lasting increase in phrenic nerve amplitude once respiratory neural activity is restored. Such long-lasting facilitation represents a form of respiratory motor plasticity known as inactivity-induced phrenic motor facilitation (iPMF). Although facilitation also occurs in inspiratory intercostal nerve activity after diminished respiratory neural activity (iIMF), it is of shorter duration. Atypical PKC activity in the cervical spinal cord is necessary for iPMF and iIMF, but the site and specific isoform of the relevant atypical PKC are unknown. Here, we used RNA interference to test the hypothesis that the zeta atypical PKC isoform (PKCζ) within phrenic motor neurons is necessary for iPMF but PKCζ within intercostal motor neurons is unnecessary for transient iIMF. Intrapleural injections of siRNAs targeting PKCζ (siPKCζ) to knock down PKCζ mRNA within phrenic and intercostal motor neurons were made in rats. Control rats received a nontargeting siRNA (NTsi) or an active siRNA pool targeting a novel PKC isoform, PKCθ (siPKCθ), which is required for other forms of respiratory motor plasticity. Phrenic nerve burst amplitude and external intercostal (T2) electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated rats exposed to 30 min of respiratory neural inactivity (i.e., neural apnea) created by modest hypocapnia (20 min) or a similar recording duration without neural apnea (time control). Phrenic burst amplitude was increased in rats treated with NTsi (68 ± 10% baseline) and siPKCθ (57 ± 8% baseline) 60 min after neural apnea vs. time control rats (-3 ± 3% baseline), demonstrating iPMF. In contrast, intrapleural siPKCζ virtually abolished iPMF (5 ± 4% baseline). iIMF was transient in all groups exposed to neural apnea; however, intrapleural siPKCζ attenuated iIMF 5 min after neural apnea (50 ± 21% baseline) vs. NTsi (97 ± 22% baseline) and siPKCθ (103 ± 20% baseline). Neural inactivity elevated the phrenic, but not intercostal, responses to hypercapnia, an effect that was blocked by siPKCζ. We conclude that PKCζ within phrenic motor neurons is necessary for long-lasting iPMF, whereas intercostal motor neuron PKCζ contributes to, but is not necessary for, transient iIMF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report important new findings concerning the mechanisms regulating a form of spinal neuroplasticity elicited by prolonged inhibition of respiratory neural activity, inactivity-induced phrenic motor facilitation (iPMF). We demonstrate that the atypical PKC isoform PKCζ within phrenic motor neurons is necessary for long-lasting iPMF, whereas intercostal motor neuron PKCζ contributes to, but is not necessary for, transient inspiratory intercostal facilitation. Our findings are novel and advance our understanding of mechanisms contributing to phrenic motor plasticity.