You always were a bastard.

G. Gillett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3528130

2002-11-01

The Hastings Center Report

Abstract:You always were a bastard. Bastard is as bastard does, not as he says. You screwed me and you screwed up my life. Bugger! Bugger! Bugger! You would bugger anyone if it gave you what you want. Imagine that these remarks are suddenly uttered by a refined-looking woman of advanced years in the midst of a medical consultation designed to assess whether she has Alzheimer Disease. She had been digressing into a series of reminiscences about her marriage and her life, and she spits out these words as an aside to her husband. Alzheimer Disease is often associated with paranoia, contrariness, and waywardness of thought, and it is in that context that this kind of remark often occurs. These symptoms can take the form of apparently out-of-character attacks on those nearest and dearest to the patient. Understandably, they can be deeply distressing to the target, who worries that they have been thought or felt before and have just never been expressed. Once the cognitive impairment reveals them, doubts about the relationship are hard to resist. But are those doubts appropriate? Are the aggressive remarks of a person with dementia expressions of his or her real feelings that we now see because a polite veneer has been stripped away, or are they an effect of the disease? If one opts for the latter view, then are they merely random thoughts that the person would not normally entertain and would indeed strongly disapprove of?. The question is difficult because of the gradual and subtle alteration in the self that is often seen in Alzheimer Disease. Those who are close to the patient often make allowances for this, looking through the changes to the person who seems to lie intact as the problem becomes more evident. Yet remarks such as these can put a severe strain on that attitude. The problem puts a life story in question. As the person "loses her grip" on herself and her life story starts to break up, what should we make of glimpsed elements that seem alien to it? Things began to happen that I just couldn't understand. There were times I addressed friends by the wrong name. Comprehending conversations seemed quite impossible. My attention span became quite short. Notes were needed to remind me of things to be done and how to do them. I would slur my speech, use inappropriate words, or simply eliminate one from a sentence. This caused me not only frustration but embarrassment. Then came the times I honestly could not remember how to plan a meal or shop for groceries. (1) This passage is a graphic illustration of the fragmentation of a coherent self and the crippling of those cognitive skills that most of us unthinkingly rely on to organize our life narratives. These life narratives form "a basis for talk and action, a point of departure for telling stories about experience, and for rendering those stories intelligible," and we use our narratives as the basis for our relationships and projects. (2) Understanding the skills involved in being who I am and holding my story together is the key to knowing what to make of this woman's aside to her husband. In Vino Veritas and the Civilized Veneer On one side of this problem we are persuaded by the popular idea that disinhibition allows a person to express a side that would normally be kept well hidden. The civilized veneer is stripped away; one acts in vino veritas. According to this image of the self, each of us has both an authentic self and a more polite and socialized presentation self, the latter a kind of mask or cloak that conceals, to some extent, who one really is. Like much of popular psychology, this image is the product of a "noble savage" romanticism combined with elements of Freudianism. (3) The civilized veneer, we could say, belongs to a view of humanity promulgated in the era of colonial expansion and the valorization of empire. …