Growth in children with nephrotic syndrome: a post hoc analysis of the NEPTUNE study

Aesha Maniar,Debbie S Gipson,Tammy Brady,Tarak Srivastava,David T Selewski,Larry A Greenbaum,Katherine M Dell,Frederick Kaskel,Susan Massengill,Cheryl Tran,Howard Trachtman,Richard Lafayette,Salem Almaani,Sangeeta Hingorani,Chia-Shi Wang,Kimberly Reidy,Gabriel Cara-Fuentes,Rasheed Gbadegesin,Kevin Myers,Christine B Sethna,Members of the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE),M Schachere,J Negrey,J Scott,S Morrison,M Pfaiff,P Canetta,A Pradhan,E Yun,S Adler,J LaPage,A Athavale,M Itteera,M Atkinson,T Dell,F Fervenza,M Hogan,J Lieske,G Hill,M Ross,P Flynn,J Kopp,L Malaga-Dieguez,O Zhdanova,F Modersitzki,L Pehrson,B Yeung,I Lee,S Quinn-Boyle,H Reich,M Hladunewich,P Ling,M Romano,A Fornoni,C Bidot,C Klida,V Derebail,K Gibson,A Froment,F Ochoa-Toro,K Meyers,K Kallem,A Swenson,K Sambandam,K Aleman,M Rogers,A Jefferson,K Tuttle,L Manahan,E Pao,A Copper,J J Lin,Stefanie Baker,M Kretzler,L Barisoni,C Gadegbeku,B Gillespie,L Holzman,L Mariani,M Sampson,J Sedor,J Zee,G Alter,H Desmond,S Eddy,D Fermin,M Larkina,S Li,C C Lienczewski,T Mainieri,R Scherr,A Smith,A Szymanski,A Williams,Carmen Avila-Casado,Serena Bagnasco,Joseph Gaut,Stephen Hewitt,Jeff Hodgin,Kevin Lemley,Matthew Palmer,Avi Rosenberg,Virginie Royal,David Thomas,Cynthia Nast
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-024-06375-9
Abstract:Background: Steroids, the mainstay of treatment for nephrotic syndrome in children, have multiple adverse effects including growth suppression. Methods: Anthropometric measurements in children < 18 years enrolled in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) were collected. The longitudinal association of medication exposure and nephrotic syndrome characteristics with height z-score and growth velocity was determined using adjusted Generalized Estimating Equation regression and linear regression. Results: A total of 318 children (57.2% males) with a baseline age of 7.64 ± 5.04 years were analyzed. The cumulative steroid dose was 216.4 (IQR 61.5, 652.7) mg/kg (N = 233). Overall, height z-scores were not significantly different at the last follow-up compared to baseline (- 0.13 ± 1.21 vs. - 0.23 ± 1.71, p = 0.21). In models adjusted for age, sex, and eGFR, greater cumulative steroid exposure (β - 7.5 × 10-6, CI - 1.2 × 10-5, - 3 × 10-6, p = 0.001) and incident cases of NS (vs. prevalent) (β - 1.1, CI - 2.22, - 0.11, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with lower height z-scores over time. Rituximab exposure was associated with higher height z-scores (β 0.16, CI 0.04, 0.29, p = 0.01) over time. Conclusion: Steroid dose was associated with lower height z-score, while rituximab use was associated with higher height z-score.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?