NAD+ precursors promote the restoration of spermatogenesis in busulfan-treated mice through inhibiting Sirt2-regulated ferroptosis

Yan-Qin Feng,Xuan Liu,Ning Zuo,Mu-Bin Yu,Wen-Meng Bian,Bao-Quan Han,Zhong-Yi Sun,Massimo De Felici,Wei Shen,Lan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.92416
IF: 11.6
2024-04-15
Theranostics
Abstract:Rationale: In recent years, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) precursors (Npre) have been widely employed to ameliorate female reproductive problems in both humans and animal models. However, whether and how Npre plays a role in the male reproductive disorder has not been fully clarified. Methods: In the present study, a busulfan-induced non-obstructive azoospermic mouse model was used, and Npre was administered for five weeks following the drug injection, with the objective of reinstating spermatogenesis and fertility. Initially, we assessed the NAD+ level, germ cell types, semen parameters and sperm fertilization capability. Subsequently, testis tissues were examined through RNA sequencing analysis, ELISA, H&E, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time PCR, and Western blotting techniques. Results: The results indicated that Npre restored normal level of NAD+ in blood and significantly alleviated the deleterious effects of busulfan (BU) on spermatogenesis, thereby partially reestablishing fertilization capacity. Transcriptome analysis, along with recovery of testicular Fe2+, GSH, NADPH, and MDA levels, impaired by BU, and the fact that Fer-1, an inhibitor of ferroptosis, restored spermatogenesis and semen parameters close to CTRL values, supported such possibility. Interestingly, the reduction in SIRT2 protein level by the specific inhibitor AGK2 attenuated the beneficial effects of Npre on spermatogenesis and ferroptosis by affecting PGC-1α and ACLY protein levels, thus suggesting how these compounds might confer spermatogenesis protection. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings indicate that NAD+ protects spermatogenesis against ferroptosis, probably through SIRT2 dependent mechanisms. This underscores the considerable potential of Npre supplementation as a feasible strategy for preserving or restoring spermatogenesis in specific conditions of male infertility and as adjuvant therapy to preserve male fertility in cancer patients receiving sterilizing treatments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?