Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation in Postoperative Analgesia After Pulmonary Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jian Zhou,Yuqing Dan,Yanling Yixian,Mengyuan Lyu,Jiayi Zhong,Zihuai Wang,Yunke Zhu,Lunxu Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001312
IF: 3.4123
2020-01-01
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Abstract:Objective The aim of the study was to identify the analgesic efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation in postoperative pain after pulmonary surgery. Design Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) were systematically searched from their inception to June 2019. The continuous variables were pooled as the weighted mean difference with correlated 95% confidence interval. Results were recognized as significant when a P value is less than 0.05. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and quality assessment were performed. Results Altogether, 10 studies were included. The pooled results indicated that transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation group conferred lower pain intensity score on the first postoperative day (weighted mean difference = -0.93, 95% confidence interval = -1.56 to -0.30, P = 0.004), postoperative day 2 (weighted mean difference = -1.00, 95% confidence interval = -1.64 to -0.35, P = 0.002), postoperative day 3 (weighted mean difference = -0.92, 95% confidence interval = -1.76 to -0.09, P = 0.03), postoperative day 4 (weighted mean difference = -0.90, 95% confidence interval = -1.24 to -0.56, P < 0.001), and postoperative day 5 (weighted mean difference = -1.39, 95% confidence interval = -2.20 to -0.57, P < 0.001) compared with the placebo transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation group. No publication bias was found. No significant discovery was obtained in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation might be an effective supplementary analgesic regimen in multimodal analgesia to decrease pain intensity after pulmonary surgery.