Falling Prevalence of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection-No Time for Complacency

A. Robinson,G. Ridgway,J. Zelin,P. Williams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095646249500600122
1995-01-01
Abstract:Sir: We read with interest Rodgers etal.'s audit of referral of cases of gonococcal infection to a genitourinary medicine clinlc'. In Edinburgh our experience differs somewhat to that in Chester. Between January 1990and December 1993508cases of gonorrhoea were diagnosed by the 3 microbiol~gy laboratories in Edinburgh and passed on to the Scottish Gonococcal Reference Laboratory. Of these 464 (91%) were seen at the GU Medicine clinic in the city. The source of referral for those seen at the GUM clinic is shown in Table 1. Of the 44 remaining patients who did not attend the GUM clinic the referral source is shown in Table 2. As can be seen from the tables although GPs referred a quarter of alIcases subsequently diagnosed as gonorrhoea, they also account for almost half of the cases which were not referred. The gynaecology department acco~nted.for 18% of the cases which were not referred despite being on the same hospital site as GUM. Data was not available to assess how many patients had been given an appointment to attend GUM and had failed to so so but a more formal referral procedure may be required to ensure adequate follow-up of these patients. The 44 patients who had not attended GUM were compared to the 464 who had. Patients who had not attended GUM were more likely to be women than men (112/464 (24%] female GUM patients of 25/44 (57%] female non-GUM patients, P<O.OO1) and were also more likely to be under the age of 20 (78/464 (17%1 for GUM attenders of 13/44 [30%] for non-GUM attenders, P=O.035). This may reflect opportunistic screening of women by GPs taking routine cervical smears or the greater reluctance of some women to attend a GUM clinic. Ten of the 44 non-GUM attenders with gonorrhoea were diagnosed in the first quarter of 1991whilst the rest of the cases were evenly distnbuted over the 4 year period. Of the 10cases 6 were from GPs and 4 from gynaecology. The reason for this sudden and transient increase in nonreferred cases is unclear.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?