Comparison of Carbon Storage in Forested and Non-Forested Soils in Tropical Wetlands of Caimanera, Colombia, and Llano, Mexico

Gastón Ballut-Dajud,Luis Carlos Sandoval Herazo,Ingris María Osorio-Martínez,Wendy Báez-García,José Luis Marín-Muñiz,Erick Arturo Betanzo Torres
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124966
IF: 3.9
2024-06-12
Sustainability
Abstract:Mangrove forests are considered to be the most productive ecosystems on the planet due to the multiple ecosystem services they offer, both environmental economic, and social; however, their area in recent years has been decreasing due to anthropogenic activities such as urbanization and deforestation. These activities alter the normal cycle of carbon stored in sediments, which is considered their main function to counteract climate change. Therefore, the objective of this research was to compare the carbon storage capacity and coverage in forested and non-forested sites of two tropical wetlands located in Colombia (the Caimanera) and Mexico (the Llano). Methodologically, we began by identifying the coverages and determining the area in the wetlands with Sentinel-2A satellite images and a supervised classification; subsequently, soil cores were extracted in all the coverages to a depth of 70 cm and the apparent density (AD), the percentage of organic carbon (OC), and the density of carbon in the soil were determined. For analysis of the variables, a trend graph was constructed between carbon density and depth with descriptive statistics, using one-way ANOVA to establish which coverage and wetland were the most significant concerning carbon storage. The results of the supervised classification showed that Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans are the dominant species, also finding deforested areas in both wetlands. The one-way ANOVA statistical test indicated that the Caimanera, with the percentage of organic carbon (18.4 ± 1.19%), is 1.57 times greater than of the Llano mangrove swamp with (11.7 ± 0.748 MgC/ha). Through the trend graph, it was observed that the carbon density of the forested area of the Caimanera ranged from 120 to 140 MgC/ha, which is higher than in the deforested areas of the same wetland between 40 and 60 MgC/ha, and the homologous areas of the Llano wetland. The results suggest that deforested areas are sources of greenhouse gas emissions because they contain less carbon than forested areas. Therefore, it is concluded that the Caimanera and the Llano wetlands have the same mangrove species and that the average organic carbon stored in their soil is below the average of other mangrove forest soils in the American continent; it is recommended that the findings of this work be considered for the carbon balances by continent and the characterization of mangrove species according to their carbon storage capacity.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issue of comparing the carbon storage capacity and coverage of forested and non-forested soils in two tropical wetlands, Caimanera in Colombia and Llano in Mexico. Specifically: 1. **Research Background**: Mangrove ecosystems are considered one of the most productive ecosystems on Earth, providing various environmental, economic, and social services. However, due to human activities such as urbanization and deforestation, the area of these ecosystems has decreased in recent years, altering the normal cycle of carbon stored in sediments, thereby affecting their primary function in responding to climate change. 2. **Research Objectives**: This paper aims to assess the impact of human activities on these ecosystems by comparing the carbon storage capacity and coverage of forested and non-forested areas in two tropical wetlands (Caimanera in Colombia and Llano in Mexico). It also seeks to provide data support for future research and conservation strategies. 3. **Methodology**: Firstly, Sentinel-2A satellite images and supervised classification techniques were used to determine the coverage types and areas of the wetlands. Subsequently, soil samples were extracted from all coverage types, and their apparent density (AD), organic carbon percentage (OC), and carbon density in the soil were measured. Descriptive statistical analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine which coverage types and wetlands were most significant in terms of carbon storage. In summary, this paper aims to reveal the differences between forested and non-forested areas by quantifying the carbon storage capacity of mangrove wetlands at two different locations, thereby providing scientific evidence for understanding the role of mangroves in responding to climate change.