Programmatic and Organizational Barriers and Facilitators to Addressing High-Risk Issues in Supportive Housing and Housing First Programs
Nick Kerman,Timothy de Pass,Sean A. Kidd,Christina Mutschler,Abe Oudshoorn,John Sylvestre,Tim Aubry,Benjamin F. Henwood,Frank Sirotich,Vicky Stergiopoulos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01373-5
2024-10-20
Community Mental Health Journal
Abstract:Risk management is an important component of service delivery in supportive housing and Housing First programs. However, there is no evidence on the implementation of risk management approaches in these settings. This qualitative study examined what service providers working in supportive housing and Housing First programs in Canada identify as the programmatic and organizational factors that affect the prevention and management of high-risk behaviours and challenges (e.g., overdose, suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, falls and fall-related injuries, fire-setting, hoarding, apartment takeovers, violence, property damage, drug selling) in their programs. In-depth interviews were completed with a purposive sample of 32 service providers. Data were analyzed using an integrative approach that incorporated techniques from qualitative description and thematic analysis. Four thematic factors, which were comprised of various barriers and facilitators, that affected management of high-risk issues in supportive housing and Housing First programs were identified: [1] flexibility in addressing risk issues; [2] early identification of risk issues; [3] built environment and housing location; and [4] resource availability. Overall, the findings underscore how service providers aim to identify high-risk issues promptly, beginning as early as referral, and that their capacity to effectively do this and intervene accordingly is dynamically shaped by various aspects of the program model, environment, and availability of internal and external resources. Yet, the findings also highlight how risk management approaches may conflict with other programmatic goals and values, and the importance of considering these collectively. Systems-level changes to strengthen programs' capacity to prevent risk and implications for future research are discussed.
public, environmental & occupational health,psychiatry,health policy & services