Abstract:The basic genetic law of life is built based on DNA double helix model and the central dogma of molecular biology (i.e. DNA-RNA bidirectional transcription and RNA-protein translation), in which DNA and most of RNA carry coding information, and proteins make up the structure of the body and carry out most of biological functions. This describes the flow of genetic information within and between individual and protein as the functional molecules in life, so DNA that codes for protein (known as exon) is functional in view of these rules. In this review, we provide an overview of the origin of “junk” DNA and further discuss how “junk” DNA functions in depth. With a glimpse on landscape of human genome, only very small fractions are protein coding DNA in our book of life. By contrast, the large fractions are non-coding DNA, which cannot be translated into proteins and have been assumed that such DNA do not contain any information nor have function. Also it has been found that the genome size of organism does not correlate well with the complexity of organism, suggesting large amounts of non-coding DNA exist in lower organism. Such non-coding DNA in organism genome are regarded as uselessness and commonly referred to as “junk” DNA. However, with the advent of next generation sequencing technologies and ability to improvement of analyzing data, these provide the possibility to systematically understand so called “junk” DNA. First, genome-wide association studies have successfully identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) underlying susceptibility to diseases; however, the majority of SNPs locate in non-coding region of genome. Moreover, the parts of non-coding DNA are highly conserved between human and mice. All of these suggest non-coding DNA are functional in some way. Second, it has been revealed that about 75 percent of our genome is actually transcribed. Such transcripts that do not code any protein are termed as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). These ncRNAs, such as canonical transfer and ribosomal RNAs, as well as the recently identified microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) circular RNAs (circRNAs) etc, have been shown to play the important physiological function in organism. Also the deregulation of these ncRNAs has been found to have relevance not only to tumorigenesis, but also to neurological, cardiovascular, developmental and other diseases. Here we further discuss the rapidly advancing fields of miRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in detail. We summarize their production, gene structure and organization in the genome and diverse functions. Although miRNA has been well studied in last decade, we are still in early step of understanding the nature and extent of the involvement of other ncRNAs in physiology and disease. This will shed light on great advances in therapeutic strategies and diagnostic approaches based on the understanding on the molecular mechanisms of ncRNAs.

Origin of functional de novo genes in humans from "hopeful monsters"

De novo genes with an lncRNA origin encode unique human brain developmental functionality

Hominoid-specific De Novo Protein-Coding Genes Originating from Long Non-Coding RNAs.

A putative scenario of how de novo protein-coding genes originate in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineage

Origins of de novo genes in human and chimpanzee

Emergence, Retention and Selection: A Trilogy of Origination for Functional De Novo Proteins from Ancestral LncRNAs in Primates.

Four classic "de novo" genes all have plausible homologs and likely evolved from retro-duplicated or pseudogenic sequences

Identification of old coding regions disproves the hominoid de novo status of genes

The origin and structural evolution of de novo genes in Drosophila

Origins of New Genes and Evolution of Their Novel Functions

De Novo Origination of a New Protein-Coding Gene in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Four classic “de novo” genes all have plausible homologs and likely evolved from retro-duplicated or pseudogenic sequences

Origin of New Genes: Evidence from Experimental and Computational Analyses

Origination and evolution of orphan genes and de novo genes in the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans

The Mystery of &ldquo;junk&rdquo; DNA

On the Origin of De Novo Genes Inarabidopsis Thalianapopulations

Expression of Random Sequences and de novo Evolved Genes From the Mouse in Human Cells Reveals Functional Diversity and Specificity

de novo gene birth as an inevitable consequence of adaptive evolution

A Synergistic, Cultivator Model of De Novo Gene Origination

Reply to: Identification of old coding regions disproves the hominoid de novo status of genes

Origin Ofsphinx, a Young Chimeric RNA Gene Indrosophilamelanogaster