The age of Twitter

J. Launer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132400

2013-10-15

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Abstract:I am slow to jump onto technological bandwagons. When an author told me very many years ago about a new kind of electronic typewriter that could remember the last sentence you wrote, I thought the idea was absurd. Some years later, when a younger doctor at our general practitioner practice suggested we should buy a mobile phone to carry when on call, I spoke out vehemently against it. Why spend money on such stupid gimmicks, I asked, when there were phone boxes around every corner? More recently, my wife started to use social media like Facebook to promote her business and I thought it was a complete waste of time. However, I did eventually catch up with the rest of the world. When my colleague Trish Greenhalgh—one of the medical writers I most admire—announced that she was stopping her regular column in the BMJ and sharing her thoughts on Twitter instead, it made me pause for thought. Shortly afterwards, I attended a board meeting of the PMJ, where the younger people urged the older ones to post items on the journal's own Twitter account @PMJ_BMJ, and to set up their own accounts as well. I started to tweet. I am now an active and enthusiastic tweeter, under the name @JohnLauner. In case you are one of the unconverted, let me say why I find Twitter so appealing. For a start, you have to share your thoughts in exactly 140 characters or less. Of course, you can keep within this limit by sending pointless messages like ‘Fried eggs and beans on toast for breakfast today’. Some people do. However, more complex messages are a serious challenge. …