Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor.

P. A. Tilbrook,S. Klinken

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/08977199909001060

Growth Factors

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews

Evelina Chapman,Michelle M. Haby,Tereza Setsuko Toma,Maritsa Carla de Bortoli,Eduardo Illanes,Maria Jose Oliveros,Jorge O. Maia Barreto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0974-3

2020-03-04

Implementation Science

Abstract:Abstract Background While there is an ample literature on the evaluation of knowledge translation interventions aimed at healthcare providers, managers, and policy-makers, there has been less focus on patients and their informal caregivers. Further, no overview of the literature on dissemination strategies aimed at healthcare users and their caregivers has been conducted. The overview has two specific research questions: (1) to determine the most effective strategies that have been used to disseminate knowledge to healthcare recipients, and (2) to determine the barriers (and facilitators) to dissemination of knowledge to this group. Methods This overview used systematic review methods and was conducted according to a pre-defined protocol. A comprehensive search of ten databases and five websites was conducted. Both published and unpublished reviews in English, Spanish, or Portuguese were included. A methodological quality assessment was conducted; low-quality reviews were excluded. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, informed by a matrix of strategy by outcome measure. The Health System Evidence taxonomy for “consumer targeted strategies” was used to separate strategies into one of six categories. Results We identified 44 systematic reviews that describe the effective strategies to disseminate health knowledge to the public, patients, and caregivers. Some of these reviews also describe the most important barriers to the uptake of these effective strategies. When analyzing those strategies with the greatest potential to achieve behavioral changes, the majority of strategies with sufficient evidence of effectiveness were combined, frequent, and/or intense over time. Further, strategies focused on the patient, with tailored interventions, and those that seek to acquire skills and competencies were more effective in achieving these changes. In relation to barriers and facilitators, while the lack of health literacy or e-literacy could increase inequities, the benefits of social media were also emphasized, for example by widening access to health information for ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic groups. Conclusions Those interventions that have been shown to be effective in improving knowledge uptake or health behaviors should be implemented in practice, programs, and policies—if not already implemented. When implementing strategies, decision-makers should consider the barriers and facilitators identified by this overview to ensure maximum effectiveness. Protocol registration PROSPERO: CRD42018093245 .

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
From Evidence Synthesis to Transfer: Results from a Qualitative Case Study with the Perspectives of Participants

Cristina Lavareda Baixinho,Óscar Ferreira,Marcelo Medeiros,Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095650

2022-05-06

Abstract:The increase in health research brings challenges to the production, synthesis, and use of research findings in clinical practice. In the case of undergraduate training in nursing, it is necessary to think about the curricular contents and create opportunities to develop skills for learning evidence-based practice. The objective of this study was to analyze nurses' perspectives regarding the effects of their participation in a project of translation of knowledge into clinical practice during undergraduate nursing education, specifically involving knowledge, attitudes, and competencies related to the use of evidence. This is a qualitative case study grounded in the knowledge-to-action theoretical framework. The participants were 13 nurses who were involved in a project about the translation of knowledge into clinical practice during the last term of their undergraduate course. The data were collected by applying interviews between December 2020 and April 2021. Content analysis was carried out by using the qualitative data analysis software tool webQDA®. The following categories emerged from the content analysis carried out on the material gathered during the interviews: understanding evidence; learning how to use evidence; transferring evidence; adjusting to the context; and observing the advantages of evidence-based practice. Extracurricular activities were perceived as an opportunity to understand what evidence is and observe in loco the advantages of health care for clients, teams, and services. During the project, the participants developed cross-sectional competencies and envisaged changes to their professional activity as a result of changes in their attitude regarding evidence and its use. We concluded that the opportunity to develop evidence-related activities allows for the development of skills and influences the attitude towards evidence-based practice and knowledge use.
From knowledge translation theory to practice: developing an evidence to care hub in a pediatric rehabilitation setting

Shauna Kingsnorth,Taryn Orava,Kathryn Parker,Golda Milo-Manson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1514075

2019-01-08

Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract:Purpose: Ensuring evidence-informed care happens systematically and consistently is not easy in complex health facilities. This paper describes the evolution of knowledge translation infrastructure (Evidence to Care) within a pediatric rehabilitation hospital to address barriers to evidence-informed decision-making and accelerate research uptake to influence clinical care.Methods: Development of Evidence to Care involved a series of steps integrating knowledge translation principles, best evidence and stakeholder needs. Key aspects included: recognizing health system drivers and organizational enablers; establishing organizational structures and processes; building and operationalizing a strategic vision through activities and demonstration projects; and evaluating impact.Results: By way of a fully realized working model, two large-scale demonstration projects aligned with the Knowledge-to-Action Cycle have been completed. Audit findings demonstrate tangible examples of improving healthcare quality through investment in knowledge translation resources, processes and tailored evidence products. Critical enablers of this infrastructure include strong leadership commitment and ongoing direction, a dedicated expert team, alignment with strategic priorities and situated within organizational structures to link research, clinical care and education.Conclusions: With a replicable model, Evidence to Care addresses established health system barriers related to time, resources, skill and knowledge through dedicated knowledge translation specialists and knowledge brokers to facilitate knowledge translation practice.Implications for rehabilitationDeveloping dedicated knowledge translation infrastructure is both novel and relatively new in healthcare.Sharing step by step processes helps other organizations learn from field-tested experiences of what works and what doesn't in a particular setting.Involving stakeholders at all levels of an organization is key to valuing knowledge translation and fostering an evidence-friendly culture.Co-creating tailored knowledge products and planning for dissemination and uptake fosters inter-disciplinary collaboration and joint problem-solving among clients, families and providers.

rehabilitation
Design and analysis of TEM horn antennas for ultra-wideband technology

Ying Suo,J. Qiu,Yeshu Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2008.4559900

2008-05-19

Abstract:TEM horn antennas for ultra wideband (UWB) system applications are proposed in which offer unique advantages by their own structure characters. To realize ultra wideband and high gain operations, some antennas are designed and compared in this paper. By optimization, two classes of antennas can both realize the same radial character, get a satisfied gain and the bandwidth is enough for practical operation. As the UWB antenna, the group delay time is considered specially. The simulation results and analyses at 1-18 GHz frequency band of the TEM horn antenna are presented.
Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy

Joshua Berman,Collins Mitambo,Beatrice Matanje-Mwagomba,Shiraz Khan,Chiyembekezo Kachimanga,Emily Wroe,Lonia Mwape,Joep J. van Oosterhout,Getrude Chindebvu,Vanessa van Schoor,Lisa M. Puchalski Ritchie,Ulysses Panisset,Damson Kathyola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0061-4

2015-12-01

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:With the support of the World Health Organization’s Evidence-Informed Policy Network, knowledge translation platforms have been developed throughout Africa, the Americas, Eastern Europe, and Asia to further evidence-informed national health policy. In this commentary, we discuss the approaches, activities and early lessons learned from the development of a Knowledge Translation Platform in Malawi (KTPMalawi). Through ongoing leadership, as well as financial and administrative support, the Malawi Ministry of Health has strongly signalled its intention to utilize a knowledge translation platform methodology to support evidence-informed national health policy. A unique partnership between Dignitas International, a medical and research non-governmental organization, and the Malawi Ministry of Health, has established KTPMalawi to engage national-level policymakers, researchers and implementers in a coordinated approach to the generation and utilization of health-sector research. Utilizing a methodology developed and tested by knowledge translation platforms across Africa, a stakeholder mapping exercise and initial capacity building workshops were undertaken and a multidisciplinary Steering Committee was formed. This Steering Committee prioritized the development of two initial Communities of Practice to (1) improve data utilization in the pharmaceutical supply chain and (2) improve the screening and treatment of hypertension within HIV-infected populations. Each Community of Practice’s mandate is to gather and synthesize the best available global and local evidence and produce evidence briefs for policy that have been used as the primary input into structured deliberative dialogues. While a lack of sustained initial funding slowed its early development, KTPMalawi has greatly benefited from extensive technical support and mentorship by an existing network of global knowledge translation platforms. With the continued support of the Malawi Ministry of Health and the Evidence-Informed Policy Network, KTPMalawi can continue to build on its role in facilitating the use of evidence in the development and refinement of health policy in Malawi.

health policy & services
Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector– a rapid evidence review

Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito,Thomas Moniz,Cristián Mansilla,Syka Iqbal,Rozalia Dobrogowska,Fiona Bennin,Shivangi Talwar,Ahmad Firas Khalid,Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3

2024-03-02

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.

health care sciences & services
How Communities of Practice Generate Knowledge Translation Outcomes to Support Public Health Issues: A Realist Synthesis

Sanne H. Elbrink,Shandell L. Elmer,Richard H. Osborne,Kumari Shweta Kalyani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1960806

2024-10-19

Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract:Communities of practice in health settings often serve to address contemporary public health issues by sharing knowledge and experiences about accelerating implementations and innovative solutions. Because there are gaps between the practical application of communities of practice and the scientific knowledge about their effectiveness, this realist synthesis aimed to identify how and why members of communities of practice translate the shared knowledge and apply it in their daily practice. In a six‐step process, this realist synthesis included a scoping review that led to an initial theory map (Step 1), followed by searches (Step 2), appraisal (Step 3), extracts and organisation (Step 4), and analysis and synthesis (Step 5). These steps organised the literature into context–mechanism–outcome configurations that guided the development of a realist framework that can support research and practice (Step 6). We identified three key ways in which knowledge translation may occur: (1) Members bring (new) knowledge to their parent organisation; (2) members change the (daily) practice in their parent organisation; and (3) members improve health outcomes through systemic changes. We found that an initial outcome of knowledge sharing within the community of practice is conditional to achieving outcomes of knowledge translation outside the community of practice. This knowledge sharing within the community of practice is more likely to occur in a structured and trusted environment where members feel safe, as well as where members recognise individual and organisational benefits from participation. To achieve knowledge translation outside the community of practice, support from the parent organisation becomes important, alongside learning and developing confidence to implement the knowledge. The synthesis of the different contexts that potentially trigger mechanisms that lead to desired outcomes provides insight into how best to inform community of practice initiators and facilitators about supporting effective public health responses.

public, environmental & occupational health,social work
Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems

Amanda Edwards,Virginia Zweigenthal,Jill Olivier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0

2019-02-07

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:BackgroundThe need for research-based knowledge to inform health policy formulation and implementation is a chronic global concern impacting health systems functioning and impeding the provision of quality healthcare for all. This paper provides a systematic overview of the literature on knowledge translation (KT) strategies employed by health system researchers and policy-makers in African countries.MethodsEvidence mapping methodology was adapted from the social and health sciences literature and used to generate a schema of KT strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers. Four reference databases were searched using defined criteria. Studies were screened and a searchable database containing 62 eligible studies was compiled using Microsoft Access. Frequency and thematic analysis were used to report study characteristics and to establish the final evidence map. Focus was placed on KT in policy formulation processes in order to better manage the diversity of available literature.ResultsThe KT literature in African countries is widely distributed, problematically diverse and growing. Significant disparities exist between reports on KT in different countries, and there are many settings without published evidence of local KT characteristics. Commonly reported KT strategies include policy briefs, capacity-building workshops and policy dialogues. Barriers affecting researchers and policy-makers include insufficient skills and capacity to conduct KT activities, time constraints and a lack of resources. Availability of quality locally relevant research was the most reported facilitator. Limited KT outcomes reflect persisting difficulties in outcome identification and reporting.ConclusionThis study has identified substantial geographical gaps in knowledge and evidenced the need to boost local research capacities on KT practices in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence mapping is also shown to be a useful approach that can assist local decision-making to enhance KT in policy and practice.

health policy & services
Research evidence communication for policy-makers: a rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators

Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto,Roberta Crevelário de Melo,Letícia Aparecida Lopes Bezerra da Silva,Bruna Carolina de Araújo,Cintia de Freitas Oliveira,Tereza Setsuko Toma,Maritsa Carla de Bortoli,Peter Nichols Demaio,Tanja Kuchenmüller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01169-9

2024-08-08

Abstract:Background: Communication is a multifaceted process, ranging from linear, one-way approaches, such as transmitting a simple message, to continuous exchanges and feedback loops among stakeholders. In particular the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical need for timely, effective and credible evidence communication to increase awareness, levels of trust, and evidence uptake in policy and practice. However, whether to improve policy responses in crises or address more commonplace societal challenges, comprehensive guidance on evidence communication to decision-makers in health policies and systems remains limited. Our objective was to identify and systematize the global evidence on frameworks, guidance and tools supporting effective communication of research evidence to facilitate knowledge translation and evidence-informed policy-making processes, while also addressing barriers and facilitators. Methods: We conducted a rapid scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Manual. Literature searches were performed across eight indexed databases and two sources of grey literature, without language or time restrictions. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed, and a narrative-interpretative synthesis was applied to present the findings. Results: We identified 16 documents presenting either complete frameworks or framework components, including guidance and tools, aimed at supporting evidence communication for policy development. These frameworks outlined strategies, theoretical models, barriers and facilitators, as well as insights into policy-makers' perspectives, communication needs, and preferences. Three primary evidence communication strategies, comprising eleven sub-strategies, emerged: "Health information packaging", "Targeting and tailoring messages to the audience", and "Combined communication strategies". Based on the documented barriers and facilitators at micro, meso and macro levels, critical factors for successful communication of evidence to policy-makers were identified. Conclusions: Effective communication is indispensable for facilitating knowledge translation and evidence-informed policy-making. Nonetheless gaps persist in frameworks designed to enhance research communication to policy-makers, particularly regarding the effectiveness of multiple communication strategies. To advance in this field, the development of comprehensive frameworks incorporating implementation strategies is warranted. Additionally, barriers and facilitators to implementing effective communication must be recognized and addressed taking diverse contexts into consideration. Registration https://zenodo.org/record/5578550.
27: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN EVIDENCE BASED KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION

Davoud Mardani,Mehdi Molavi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.27

IF: 3.006

2017-02-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Background and aims: Much of early medical and nursing practice was based on nonscientific traditions that resulted in variable and haphazard patient outcomes. These traditions and rituals, which were based on folklore, gut instinct, trial and error, and personal preference, were often passed down from one generation of practitioner to another. It has become essential for practitioners to use the best data available to make patient care decisions and carry out the scientific and evidence-based interventions. The aim of this study is suggestion of a framework for easily translation of evidence-based knowledge into clinical practice. Methods: This discussion paper explains the process that evidence-based knowledge is created from crude scientific knowledge, disseminated among stakeholders, implemented into clinical practice and ultimately evaluated. In May 2014, the primary author searched electronic and scientific databases without limiting searches by publication date, to find applicable literature. Results: This framework presented how evidence-based knowledge can be created and distributed among stakeholders to implement into practice. Additionally, this framework explains interactions between stakeholders, context, and evidence-based knowledge from acquirement to adherence. Knowledge can easily translate into clinical practice by step-by-step following of 4 phases consisted of knowledge creation, knowledge dissemination, knowledge implementation, evaluation and feedback. Conclusion: Today, evidence based knowledge translation has become an imperative component for healthcare disciplines and identified as one of most important priorities of present millennium. Evidence-based knowledge translation is a simple and feasible way to bridging the gap between evidence-based knowledge and clinical practice that can be carry out trough utilization of current conceptual framework.

medicine, general & internal
University Curricula in Evidence-Informed Decision Making and Knowledge Translation: Integrating Best Practice, Innovation, and Experience for Effective Teaching and Learning

Nasreen S. Jessani,Lynn Hendricks,Liesl Nicol,Taryn Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00313

IF: 5.2

2019-12-03

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:As attention to Evidence Informed Decision Making (EIDM) and Knowledge Translation (KT) in research, policy and practice grows, so does a need for capacity enhancement in amongst evidence producers and evidence users. Recognizing that most researchers enter the professional sphere with little or no appreciation of the importance and power of EIDM, the Centre for Evidence-based Health Care at Stellenbosch University, South Africa, spearheaded the development and accreditation of a foundational course titled Evidence-Informed Decision making: The Art, Science and Complexity of knowledge translation. The curriculum draws on the principles of adult learning and effective teaching that includes integrating seven key aspects: (1) extraction of intuitive and tacit knowledge (2) autonomous knowledge generation (3) diverse perspectives (4) learning by doing (5) peer-support and critique (6) facilitator coaching and (7) constant reflection. In this paper, we reflect on these techniques in enhancing understanding and utilization of KT in advancing EIDM. The in-person short course has been offered 5 times since its launch in September 2017 with attendance by ~85 senior researchers and government officials—each of whom left the workshop with three completed outputs: a stakeholder matrix, an engagement strategy for their chosen stakeholder and a plan for evaluating the impact of their KT strategy. Interest in the course has grown considerably: (a) Requests from local institutes of research for dedicated training to their staff; (b) Incorporation into international program partner capacity enhancing strategies; (c) Publication of a book chapter designed using course content; (d) Adaptation and utilization of the templates and tools as teaching resources (e) Informing organizational stakeholder engagement strategies (f) Adaptation of the modules for conference capacity building workshops. In summary, designing courses that take into consideration adult principles of learning is not a new concept. However, effective delivery of such courses is still nascent. We found that integrating the seven aspects mentioned above, including researchers together with decision-makers in the workshops, and having an experienced facilitator is critical for effective learning. Enhancing knowledge and skills "just in time" rather than "just in case" has demonstrated increased potential for immediate relevance, uptake and sustainability.

public, environmental & occupational health
Translating Knowledge From a Family Systems Approach to Clinical Practice: Insights From Knowledge Translation Research Experiences

Fabie Duhamel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840717739030

2017-11-01

Journal of Family Nursing

Abstract:While there has been continued growth in family nursing knowledge, the complex process of implementing and sustaining family nursing in health care settings continues to be a challenge for family nursing researchers and clinicians alike. Developing knowledge and skills about how to translate family nursing theory to practice settings is a global priority to make family nursing more visible. There is a critical need for more research methods and research evidence about how to best move family nursing knowledge into action. Enhancing health care practice is a multifactorial process that calls for a systemic perspective to ensure its efficacy and sustainability. This article presents insights derived from lessons learned through recent research experiences of using a knowledge translation model to promote practice changes in health care settings. These insights aim to optimize (a) knowledge translation of a Family Systems Approach (FSA) in practice settings; (b) knowledge translation research processes; and (c) sustainability of desired changes in practice with families in health care settings.

nursing,family studies
How researchers can translate health evidence into books for children

Erin I Walsh,Ginny M Sargent,Laura Gooyers,Jessica Masters,Karima Laachir,Sotiris Vardoulakis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae035

2024-06-01

Abstract:The health promotion literature that considers how scientific evidence can be effectively communicated tends to focus on evaluating the effectiveness of communication materials. This has resulted in a knowledge gap regarding effective knowledge translation processes. This study explores the process, reasoning and practices for developing books for children that incorporate evidence-based information to aid understanding of scientific evidence about health and environmental or natural disasters. This study is informed by a systematic review of the literature combined with responses to an email interview with authors of books for children. Nine published studies were included in the systematic review. Twenty-two authors responded to the email survey (25% response rate, following 86 invitations). We report seven key findings to guide the development of health-promoting books for children: (i) understand the needs and expectations of the audience, (ii) articulate the topic and research evidence, (iii) assemble a team with a mix of content knowledge and creative expertise, (iv) format should be chosen to suit the user group and guided by the creative team, (v) early testing with children and their support system is crucial, (vi) develop a dissemination strategy to reach the user group and (vii) engage in reflexivity through evaluation of effectiveness of messaging. The current investigation can guide the process, reasoning and practice of developing books for children that incorporate evidence about health and environmental disasters.
Constructing evidence ecosystem to promote the development of evidence-based nursing practice

Yingfeng Zhou,Jie Zhong,Li Li,Na Huang,Xiuhong Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019.03.001

2019-01-01

Abstract:Under the background of evidence translation, to promote the continuous cycle of evidence from generation to application, this article introduced the concept of evidence ecosystem established by the international organization of MAGIC.And this article also analyzed six stages of flowing process and proposed four strategies for promoting evidence circulating in the system.Finally, this article discussed how to promote the development of evidence-based nursing practice through establishment evidence ecosystem in nursing field.
[Sarcopenia as a component of "frailty"].

M. Vandewoude

2007-03-01

Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie

Abstract:
Current Status and Prospect of Knowledge Translation in Health Care

Li Jing,Deng Jun,Chen Mei,Tian Junye,Zhang Zhen,Ding Yanming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.36.002

2019-01-01

Abstract:This article reviewed the intension and current status of knowledge translation in health care and analyzed the existing problems including a lack of nursing evidence summary, low quality of nursing evidence, nurses with low ability in evidence-based and insufficient evidence-based atmosphere. It is recommended that knowledge translation researchers of the institutions and clinical knowledge translation practitioners should work closely together to carry out integrated knowledge translation research, and should produce more best evidence summary and knowledge translation tools close to clinical needs, accelerate the cultivation of evidence-based nursing talents at all levels, and use a variety of incentives to support evidence-based practice,apply the concepts and methods of knowledge translation to improve the quality of nursing and promote the development of nursing science.
Evidências para a Promoção da Saúde no Brasil: relato de um serviço de resposta rápida

Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto,Tereza Setsuko Toma,Roberta Crevelário de Melo,Letícia Aparecida Lopes Bezerra da Silva,Bruna Carolina de Araújo,Emanuelly Camargo Tafarello,Jessica De Lucca Da Silva,Maritsa Carla de Bortoli,Graziela Tavares Ribeiro,Rosana Evangelista Poderoso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2024.82

2024-09-07

Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública

Abstract:RESUMO Objetivo. Apresentar a experiência de um serviço de resposta rápida para apoiar a tomada de decisão em saúde. Método São descritos os processos e resultados de um serviço de produção de revisões rápidas e mapas de evidências para apoiar a tomada de decisão no âmbito da Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde, bem como a percepção dos autores sobre o processo de trabalho. Resultados O serviço de resposta rápida teve início em 2020. Até dezembro de 2023, foram produzidas 54 revisões rápidas e cinco mapas de evidências, abrangendo nove temáticas de Promoção da Saúde. Estes produtos foram desenvolvidos em quatorze etapas por uma equipe composta por coordenador, supervisoras, revisores e bibliotecária. O desenvolvimento das respostas rápidas se configurou um processo de tradução do conhecimento e envolveu a interação contínua entre as equipes demandantes e de produção. O estabelecimento de comunicação efetiva foi um fator crítico para que os produtos fossem entregues em tempo oportuno e alinhados às necessidades dos tomadores de decisão e seus apoiadores. Conclusão Os serviços de resposta rápida podem contribuir para melhorar o uso de evidências na tomada de decisão nas políticas e sistemas de saúde.

public, environmental & occupational health
Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries

Violet Ibukayo Murunga,Rose Ndakala Oronje,Imelda Bates,Nadia Tagoe,Justin Pulford

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0524-0

2020-02-10

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:Abstract Background Knowledge translation (KT) is a dynamic and iterative process that includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge to yield beneficial outcomes for society. Effective KT requires researchers to play an active role in promoting evidence uptake. This paper presents a systematised review of evidence on low- and middle-income country (LMIC) researchers’ KT capacity, practice and interventions for enhancing their KT practice (support) with the aim of identifying gaps and informing future research and interventions. Methods An electronic search for peer-reviewed publications focusing on LMIC researchers’ KT capacity, practice and support across all academic fields, authored in English and from the earliest records available to February 2019, was conducted using PubMed and Scopus. Selected studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, data pertaining to publication characteristics and study design extracted, and an a priori thematic analysis of reported research findings completed. Results The search resulted in 334 screened articles, of which 66 met the inclusion criteria. Most ( n = 43) of the articles presented original research findings, 22 were commentaries and 1 was a structured review; 47 articles reported on researchers’ KT practice, 12 assessed the KT capacity of researchers or academic/research institutions and 9 reported on KT support for researchers. More than half (59%) of the articles focused on sub-Saharan Africa and the majority (91%) on health research. Most of the primary studies used the case study design (41%). The findings suggest that LMIC researchers rarely conduct KT and face a range of barriers at individual and institutional levels that limit their KT practice, including inadequate KT knowledge and skills, particularly for communicating research and interacting with research end-users, insufficient funding, and inadequate institutional guidelines, structures and incentives promoting KT practice. Furthermore, the evidence-base on effective interventions for enhancing LMIC researchers' KT practice is insufficient and largely of weak quality. Conclusions More high-quality research on researchers’ KT capacity, practice and effective KT capacity strengthening interventions is needed. Study designs that extend beyond case studies and descriptive studies are recommended, including better designed evaluation studies, e.g. use of realist approaches, pragmatic trials, impact evaluations, implementation research and participatory action research.

health policy & services
Knowledge translation strategies used for sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in child health: a multimethod qualitative study

Christine E. Cassidy,Rachel Flynn,Alyson Campbell,Lauren Dobson,Jodi Langley,Deborah McNeil,Ella Milne,Pilar Zanoni,Megan Churchill,Karen M. Benzies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01777-4

2024-02-19

BMC Nursing

Abstract:Sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is suboptimal in healthcare. Evidence on how knowledge translation (KT) strategies are used for the sustainability of EBIs in practice is lacking. This study examined what and how KT strategies were used to facilitate the sustainability of Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare)TM, a psychoeducational model of care scaled and spread across 14 neonatal intensive care units, in Alberta, Canada.

nursing
Factors Influencing the Translation of Evidence Into Clinical Practice for Hospital Allied Health Professionals in Terms of the Domains of Behaviour Change Theory: A Systematic Review

Jacqueline Batchelor,Cameron Hemmert,Isabelle Meulenbroeks,Crystal Tang,Reema Harrison,Rajna Ogrin,Andrew Baillie,Mitchell Sarkies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241285993

2024-09-25

Evaluation & the Health Professions

Abstract:Evaluation &the Health Professions, Ahead of Print. This systematic review provides an overview of the unique challenges allied health professions face in the translation and implementation of evidence into practice, which remain relatively under reported and uninformed by a theoretical basis of behaviour change. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2022 were searched for primary study designs resulting in 21 articles included in this review (PROSPERO: 2022 CRD42022314996). Allied health disciplines reported in the review were mainly from occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietetics, and speech pathology. The most frequently reported implementation determinants across the Theoretical Domains Framework were identified as 'environmental context and resources', and 'knowledge'. The results also identified a greater influence of 'social influences' and 'beliefs about consequences' in implementation. Implementing evidence into clinical practice is a multifaceted, complex process, and the use of the Theoretical Domains Framework provided a systematic approach to understanding the drivers behind the target behaviours. However, there is a paucity of studies across the allied health professions that describe implementation strategies used and their impact. Many of the studies focused on implementation by the individual clinician rather than the role organizations can play in the translation of evidence into practice.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services

Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor.

Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews

From Evidence Synthesis to Transfer: Results from a Qualitative Case Study with the Perspectives of Participants

From knowledge translation theory to practice: developing an evidence to care hub in a pediatric rehabilitation setting

Design and analysis of TEM horn antennas for ultra-wideband technology

Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy

Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector– a rapid evidence review

How Communities of Practice Generate Knowledge Translation Outcomes to Support Public Health Issues: A Realist Synthesis

Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems

Research evidence communication for policy-makers: a rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators

27: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN EVIDENCE BASED KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION

University Curricula in Evidence-Informed Decision Making and Knowledge Translation: Integrating Best Practice, Innovation, and Experience for Effective Teaching and Learning

Translating Knowledge From a Family Systems Approach to Clinical Practice: Insights From Knowledge Translation Research Experiences

How researchers can translate health evidence into books for children

Constructing evidence ecosystem to promote the development of evidence-based nursing practice

[Sarcopenia as a component of "frailty"].

Current Status and Prospect of Knowledge Translation in Health Care

Evidências para a Promoção da Saúde no Brasil: relato de um serviço de resposta rápida

Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries

Knowledge translation strategies used for sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in child health: a multimethod qualitative study

Factors Influencing the Translation of Evidence Into Clinical Practice for Hospital Allied Health Professionals in Terms of the Domains of Behaviour Change Theory: A Systematic Review