Abstract:Leaf area index (LAI), defined as one half the total leaf area per unit ground area, and Vcmax, representing the maximal carboxylation rate of leaves, are two most significant parameters used in most Terrestrial Biosphere Models (TBMs). The ability of TBMs to simulate gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) for evergreen needle-leave forests (ENF) can be significantly hampered by uncertainties in LAI and Vcmax. Remotely sensed (RS) LAI for ENF is generally underestimated in winter, early spring and late autumn. Although constant Vcmax throughout the growing season is often used in TBMs for GPP and ET modeling, it could vary significantly under leaf aging and stressed conditions. There were recent studies that apply seasonal leaf chlorophyll constraints on GPP modeling for croplands and deciduous forests, but little attention is given to the influence of the seasonality of either LAI or Vcmax on GPP or ET estimations for the ENF biome. In this study, we pay special attention to this biome, with the purpose of investigating if the representations of seasonal LAI and Vmax variations are essential in TBMs. To serve this purpose, the University of Toronto LAI product Version 2 was corrected for its seasonal variation using leaf lifespan and in-situ measurements at eight ENF sites in Canada. Seasonal Vcmax variation was derived from the MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI) through downscaling it to the leaf level using a scheme with a general vertical nitrogen distribution within the canopy. Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is thus derived from MTCI and converted to Vcmax using empirical equations. Four model cases with and without considerations of the seasonal LAI and Vcmax variations were tested and compared. Validation against eddy covariance measurements indicates that the case with both LAI and Vcmax variations produced the highest R-2, lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for both GPP and ET simulations, and thus outperforms all other cases without considering the variations or with consideration of one of the variations only. In this best case, the simulated daily GPP yields R-2 of 0.91, RMSE of 0.91 g C m(-2) and MAE of 0.65 g C m(-2), while the simulated daily ET yields R-2 of 0.8, RMSE of 0.52 mm and MAE of 0.34 mm. Most improvements were found in spring and autumn. Not only the correlations between the seasonal trajectories of model simulation and observation were improved, but also the annual total GPP and ET were more accurately estimated. The smallest mean absolute relative bias to eddy covariance measurements is 9% for GPP and 15% for ET, both were found in the best case. Moreover, improvements in GPP were more pronounced than in ET. Our results highlight the significance of considering both seasonal structural and physiological characteristics of leaves in TBMs. Considering the important role that evergreen coniferous forests play in global terrestrial ecosystems, global simulations of GPP and ET in space and time can benefit from the proper representation of seasonal variations in canopy structure and leaf physiology as represented by LAI and Vcmax, respectively.

Leaf chlorophyll content is the crucial factor for the temporal and spatial variation of global plants leaf maximum carboxylation rate

Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships

Relationship Between Leaf Maximum Carboxylation Rate and Chlorophyll Content Preserved Across 13 Species

Global Patterns and Drivers of Leaf Photosynthetic Capacity: the Relative Importance of Environmental Factors and Evolutionary History

Leaf photosynthetic pigment as a predictor of leaf maximum carboxylation rate in a farmland ecosystem

Estimating Photosynthetic Capacity from Optimized Rubisco–chlorophyll Relationships among Vegetation Types and under Global Change

Global Photosynthetic Capacity Jointly Determined by Enzyme Kinetics and Eco-Evo-environmental Drivers

Seasonal variations in leaf maximum photosynthetic capacity and its dependence on climate factors across global FLUXNET sites

Global Photosynthetic Capacity of C3 Biomes Retrieved from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Leaf Chlorophyll Content

Maximum Carboxylation Rate Estimation with Chlorophyll Content As a Proxy of Rubisco Content

Improved Global Estimation of Seasonal Variations in C3 Photosynthetic Capacity Based on Eco-Evolutionary Optimality Hypotheses and Remote Sensing

Variations and determinants of carbon content in plants: a global synthesis

Diverse Photosynthetic Capacity of Global Ecosystems Mapped by Satellite Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements.

Seasonal Changes of Leaf Chlorophyll Content As a Proxy of Photosynthetic Capacity in Winter Wheat and Paddy Rice

An Optimality-Based Model Explains Seasonal Variation In C3 Plant Photosynthetic Capacity

Global datasets of leaf photosynthetic capacity for ecological and earth system research

Seasonal variation in the relationship between leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic capacity

Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment.

Estimation of Leaf Photosynthetic Capacity from Leaf Chlorophyll Content and Leaf Age in a Subtropical Evergreen Coniferous Plantation

Seasonality of Leaf Area Index and Photosynthetic Capacity for Better Estimation of Carbon and Water Fluxes in Evergreen Conifer Forests

Comparative assessment of leaf photosynthetic capacity datasets for estimating terrestrial gross primary productivity