The stiff knee: evaluation and management.

J. Cuckler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20020901-34

2002-09-01

Orthopedics

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

How to manage a native stiff knee

Francesco Pirato,Federica Rosso,Federico Dettoni,Davide Edoardo Bonasia,Matteo Bruzzone,Roberto Rossi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-24-0034

IF: 4.775

2024-05-11

EFORT Open Reviews

Abstract:Knee stiffness is a widely known and worrying condition in several postoperative knees. Less is known about native stiff knee. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the available literature on native stiff knee epidemiology, classification and treatment. In 1989 stiff knee was defined as a knee with less than 50° of total range of motion. If range of motion is <30°, it is defined as an ankylosed knee. Knee stiffness can be divided into three main types: flexion contractures, extension contractures, and combined contractures. Different risk factors have been associated to native stiff knee and grouped into modifiable or not modifiable. Furthermore, risk factors can be divided into patients' related no patients'-related. Different treatment modalities can be indicated to treat knee stiffness, including manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic and open surgical release. When stiffness is associated with articular disruption TKA represent an option. TKA in native stiff knee can be challenging for the surgeon. Implant's choice and knee exposure are the first steps. In some cases, additional release and extensive can be considered. A stepwise approach and careful preoperative planning are mandatory to obtain long-term satisfactory outcomes. Native stiff knee is a rare but invalidating condition. Different treatment modalities have been proposed as treatment. However, considering that it is frequently associated to sever arthritis, TKA can be an option in painful stiff knees. Nature of knee stiffness necessitates a customized approach to ensure successful management and achieve satisfying outcomes.

orthopedics
The stiff knee: Causes and cures

Jason L. Blevins,Peter K. Sculco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2018.04.009

2018-03-01

Seminars in Arthroplasty

Abstract:Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty one of the most common postoperative challenges. Stiffness is currently defined as mild, moderate or severe and is based on loss of flexion or terminal extension. The causes of postoperative stiffness are multifactorial and include poor preoperative range of motion, overly tight flexion or extension gaps, component malrotation, infection, or arthrofibrosis. Treatment can be separated into early or chronic stiffness and is treated with appropriate physical therapy, followed by manipulation under anesthesia which is best performed within 3 months of surgery. For chronic stiffness, arthroscopic lysis of adhesions and MUA is an option, particularly for flexion deficits, or open lysis of adhesions with polyethylene downsizing. Component revision is usually performed after one year from surgery for the severely stiff knee and those with malrotated/malaligned components. For MUA, around 85% of patients will return to normal function and ROM. For the remaining 15%, further surgical intervention can improve ROM by around 15 to 30 degrees. For component revision in the correct patient, ROM can improve significantly but complication, reoperation rates are higher than for aseptic revision surgery. This article reviews the causes and potential cures for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.
Total Knee Arthroplasty in Stiff Knees

Li Feng,Zhang Ke,Tian Hua

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To discuss the strategy and results of total knee arthroplasty for stiff knee.Methods A retrospective study was performed for 30 cases between 2005 and 2009.There were 16 cases of rheumatoid arthritis,11 cases of osteoarthritis,2 cases of ankylosing spondylitis and 1 case of hemophilic arthritis.The preoperative arc of movement was 39.6°(range,10~50°),flexion contracture was 32.3° (range,0~55°),HSS knee score was 40.2 (range,15~71).Results The difficulties encountered in surgical exposure were managed by using various extensile exposure techniques.The average postoperative ROM at 18 months follow-up was 89°(50~120°).HSS knee score was 82 (range,70~95).Conclusion Total knee arthroplasty in stiff knees can achieve correction of deformity with a significant gain in range of motion and marked improvement in quality of life.
Knee osteoarthritis: a review of management options

SM Hussain,DW Neilly,S Baliga,S Patil,RMD Meek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0036933015619588

2016-02-01

Scottish Medical Journal

Abstract:Osteoarthritis of the knee is a complex peripheral joint disorder with multiple risk factors. The molecular basis of osteoarthritis has been generally accepted; however, the exact pathogenesis is still not known. Management of patients with osteoarthritis involves a comprehensive history, thorough physical examination and appropriate radiological investigation. The relative slow progress in the disease allows a stepwise algorithmic approach in treatment. Non-surgical treatment involves patient education, lifestyle modification and the use of orthotic devises. These can be achieved in the community. Surgical options include joint sparing procedures such as arthroscopyando osteotomy or joint-replacing procedures. Joint-replacing procedures can be isolated to a single compartment such as patellofemoral arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee replacement or total knee arthroplasty. The key to a successful long-term outcome is optimal patient selection, preoperative counselling and good surgical technique.

medicine, general & internal
Evaluation of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness

Liu Sida,Zhong Tianwei,Wu Yuxuan,Zhao Wei,Jiang Huajun,Han Feng,Jiang Peilong,Qu Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20211026-00309

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic arthrolysis in the treatment of posttraumatic elbow stiffness.Methods:Thirty-one patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis in our department from October 2016 to August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The range of motion (ROM) and Mayo elbow performance score(MEPS) before and after elbow operation were evaluated.Results:Twenty-six patients were follow-up for more than 6 months, 6 to 62 months, with an average of 27.8 months. Finally, the elbow flexion range of motion increased from (95.4±19.7)° before operation to (132.8±9.2)° after operation, and the extension range of motion increased from (-34.5±6.4)° before operation to (-15.5±12.5)° after operation. The ROM of elbow joint increased from (60.8±28.8)° before operation to (117.2±19.2)° after operation, and MEPS increased from 62.9±16.8 to 89.8±11.1 after operation. There were significant differences in elbow ROM and MEPS before and after operation ( P<0.001). Two patients had complications. One was postoperative elbow hematoma and the other was recurrence of elbow stiffness. Both patients underwent secondary surgery and achieved satisfactory results at the final follow-up. All the patients had no complications of infection and nerve injury. Conclusion:The arthroscopic arthrolysis in the treatment of posttraumatic elbow stiffness can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy.
The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm

A L Saperstein,J F Fetto

Abstract:The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is a common site of sports-related injury. The natural history of chronic instability, reinjury, and further intra-articular damage is well documented. Appropriate management of ACL insufficiency must be based upon a knowledge of the available diagnostic and therapeutic options, their indications, and their effectiveness. At the same time, the treatment plan must be tailored to the demands and expectations of the individual patient.
Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review.

Kaetlyn R. Arant,J. Katz,R. Loeser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.22171

2021-02-09

Abstract:Importance Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, affecting an estimated more than 240 million people worldwide, including an estimated more than 32 million in the US. Osteoarthritis is the most frequent reason for activity limitation in adults. This Review focuses on hip and knee OA. Observations Osteoarthritis can involve almost any joint but typically affects the hands, knees, hips, and feet. It is characterized by pathologic changes in cartilage, bone, synovium, ligament, muscle, and periarticular fat, leading to joint dysfunction, pain, stiffness, functional limitation, and loss of valued activities, such as walking for exercise and dancing. Risk factors include age (33% of individuals older than 75 years have symptomatic and radiographic knee OA), female sex, obesity, genetics, and major joint injury. Persons with OA have more comorbidities and are more sedentary than those without OA. The reduced physical activity leads to a 20% higher age-adjusted mortality. Several physical examination findings are useful diagnostically, including bony enlargement in knee OA and pain elicited with internal hip rotation in hip OA. Radiographic indicators include marginal osteophytes and joint space narrowing. The cornerstones of OA management include exercises, weight loss if appropriate, and education-complemented by topical or oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in those without contraindications. Intra-articular steroid injections provide short-term pain relief and duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy. Opiates should be avoided. Clinical trials have shown promising results for compounds that arrest structural progression (eg, cathepsin K inhibitors, Wnt inhibitors, anabolic growth factors) or reduce OA pain (eg, nerve growth factor inhibitors). Persons with advanced symptoms and structural damage are candidates for total joint replacement. Racial and ethnic disparities persist in the use and outcomes of joint replacement. Conclusions and Relevance Hip and knee OA are highly prevalent and disabling. Education, exercise and weight loss are cornerstones of management, complemented by NSAIDs (for patients who are candidates), corticosteroid injections, and several adjunctive medications. For persons with advanced symptoms and structural damage, total joint replacement effectively relieves pain.

Medicine
Knee Instability Following Fractures Around the Knee Joint: Diagnostic Dilemma and Management Challenges

Elangovan, Ajay Gowtham Amutham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01228-x

2024-08-25

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Abstract:Knee instability following fractures around the knee joint is not uncommon but is often missed. They present challenges in identifying them during index injury or at follow-up. We share our experience of knee instability following fractures around the knee joint.

orthopedics
Infographic. Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation

Iain Robert Murray,Navnit S Makaram,Chryssa Neo,Andrew G Geeslin,Jorge Chahla,Gilbert Moatshe,Kay Crossley,Michelle E Kew,Aileen Davis,Maria Tuca,Hollis Potter,Dina C Janse van Rensburg,Carolyn A Emery,SeungPyo Eun,Hege Grindem,Frank R Noyes,Robert G Marx,Chris Harner,Bruce A Levy,Enda King,James L Cook,Daniel B Whelan,George F Hatch,Christopher J Wahl,Kristian Thorborg,James J Irrgang,Nicolas Pujol,Michael J Medvecky,Michael J Stuart,Aaron J Krych,Lars Engebretsen,James P Stannard,Peter MacDonald,Romain Seil,Gregory C Fanelli,Travis G Maak,K Donald Shelbourne,Evert Verhagen,Volker Musahl,Michael T Hirschmann,Mark D Miller,Robert C Schenck,Robert F LaPrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-109051

IF: 18.4793

2024-12-02

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a heterogeneous spectrum of pathology. Clinical evaluation, diagnosis and management of these injuries remains controversial. In order to assess the existing literature evaluating the diagnosis and management of MLKIs, we performed a scoping review1 based on established methodology.2 3 This process established that the majority of the 417 articles identified relating to MLKI were composed of small retrospective studies, 30% were composed of narrative reviews presenting no original data and only 1% of articles represented level 1 evidence.1 Overall, 70% of included studies were published within the last 12 years, with over half (57%) originating from the USA.1 The lack of diversity within author and patient groups that comprise MLKI research was highlighted. Consistently contentious themes within MLKI management were highlighted, including nomenclature, choice of imaging, timing of surgical intervention, operative versus non-operative management...

sport sciences
Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise

RAFAEL F. ESCAMILLA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200101000-00020

2001-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: Because a strong and stable knee is paramount to an athlete's or patient's success, an understanding of knee biomechanics while performing the squat is helpful to therapists, trainers, sports medicine physicians, researchers, coaches, and athletes who are interested in closed kinetic chain exercises, knee rehabilitation, and training for sport. The purpose of this review was to examine knee biomechanics during the dynamic squat exercise.METHODS: Tibiofemoral shear and compressive forces, patellofemoral compressive force, knee muscle activity, and knee stability were reviewed and discussed relative to athletic performance, injury potential, and rehabilitation.RESULTS: Low to moderate posterior shear forces, restrained primarily by the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), were generated throughout the squat for all knee flexion angles. Low anterior shear forces, restrained primarily by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), were generated between 0 and 60 degrees knee flexion. Patellofemoral compressive forces and tibiofemoral compressive and shear forces progressively increased as the knees flexed and decreased as the knees extended, reaching peak values near maximum knee flexion. Hence, training the squat in the functional range between 0 and 50 degrees knee flexion may be appropriate for many knee rehabilitation patients, because knee forces were minimum in the functional range. Quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius activity generally increased as knee flexion increased, which supports athletes with healthy knees performing the parallel squat (thighs parallel to ground at maximum knee flexion) between 0 and 100 degrees knee flexion. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the parallel squat was not injurious to the healthy knee.CONCLUSIONS: The squat was shown to be an effective exercise to employ during cruciate ligament or patellofemoral rehabilitation. For athletes with healthy knees, performing the parallel squat is recommended over the deep squat, because injury potential to the menisci and cruciate and collateral ligaments may increase with the deep squat. The squat does not compromise knee stability, and can enhance stability if performed correctly. Finally, the squat can be effective in developing hip, knee, and ankle musculature, because moderate to high quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius activity were produced during the squat.

sport sciences
Knee positioning systems for X-ray environment: a literature review

Catarina Lopes,Adelio Vilaca,Cláudia Rocha,Joaquim Mendes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01221-y

2023-01-25

Abstract:The knee is one of the most stressed joints of the human body, being susceptible to ligament injuries and degenerative diseases. Due to the rising incidence of knee pathologies, the number of knee X-rays acquired is also increasing. Such X-rays are obtained for the diagnosis of knee injuries, the evaluation of the knee before and after surgery, and the monitoring of the knee joint's stability. These types of diagnosis and monitoring of the knee usually involve radiography under physical stress. This widely used medical tool provides a more objective analysis of the measurement of the knee laxity than a physical examination does, involving knee stress tests, such as valgus, varus, and Lachman. Despite being an improvement to physical examination regarding the physician's bias, stress radiography is still performed manually in a lot of healthcare facilities. To avoid exposing the physician to radiation and to decrease the number of X-ray images rejected due to inadequate positioning of the patient or the presence of artefacts, positioning systems for stress radiography of the knee have been developed. This review analyses knee positioning systems for X-ray environment, concluding that they have improved the objectivity and reproducibility during stress radiographs, but have failed to either be radiolucent or versatile with a simple ergonomic set-up.
Arthroscopic Management of Stiff Elbow

Erica Kholinne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967124s00387

IF: 2.6

2024-10-25

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. Restoration of motion in a stiff elbow is complex, time-consuming, and costly. Traditionally, a stiff elbow has been defined as having less than 100 degrees of motion arc in the pronosupination and flexion-extension plane. However, this definition may not be sufficient and accurate anymore. Stiff elbow is often underestimated because the traditional belief is that the elbow is not a weight-bearing joint. However, recent studies have shown that the elbow bears loads created by gravity and muscle contraction, and stiffness of the elbow increases load-bearing during resting and arm swing motion.Stiffness of the elbow can be caused by intrinsic and extrinsic components, which can later be mixed. If degeneration is the background of the disease, then the bony component is more dominant. At the same time, if post-traumatic is the background of the disease, then the soft tissue component is more dominant. Limitations of flexion are usually caused by a bony block in the anterior compartment and soft tissue contracture in the posterior part. On the other hand, a limitation in extension is usually caused by a bony block in the posterior compartment and soft tissue contracture in the anterior part.Treatment of the stiff elbow ranges from debridement surgery to reconstruction surgery. Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is one of the options for treating a stiff elbow. However, it has its challenges, such as a steep learning curve, limited working space, and limited indication in a stiff elbow with advanced-stage elbow osteoarthritis. It benefits patients because of less pain and less intra-articular bleeding, with the premise for early exercise and rapid return of function. During an arthroscopic osteocapsular release, release to the medial collateral ligament can improve flexion. However, good visualization during MCL release is mandatory to avoid ulnar nerve injury and perform adequate release. Prophylactic ulnar nerve release prior to arthroscopic osteocapsular release is recommended for patients with less than 90 degrees of preoperative elbow flexion. Arthroscopic osteocapsular release provides the same functional score compared to open osteocapsular release in primary elbow OA with a stiff elbow. However, the open group can expect a greater flexion arc due to better visibility during the MCL procedure. Arthroscopic osteocapsular release for post-traumatic stiff elbow showed better range of motion gain in extra-articular fracture cases compared to intra-articular fracture cases.Stiff elbow is challenging, and arthroscopic limitations are especially significant for severely limited flexion motion cases or advanced cases. Arthroscopic management should be avoided if the anatomy is distorted.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Topography of the reconstructed pelvic peritoneum after proctocolectomy

B. Risberg,N. Kock,H. Myrvold,A. Nilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588097

1974-03-01

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract:
Diagnosis and Treatment of Patellar Instability

Nobuo Adachi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967124s00382

IF: 2.6

2024-10-25

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. The patellar instability is the complicated knee condition, which has several potential congenital factors, such as balance disorder between medial and lateral soft tissues, dysplasia of femoral condyle, patella height, rotation of femur and tibia, or general joint laxity. The patella dislocation is usually categorized in to "permanent", "habitual", and "recurrent" dislocation. It goes without saying that precise diagnosis and proper selection of treatment is indispensable for successful clinical outcomes for any patellar instability. First, we will demonstrate some knacks and pitfalls for diagnosis of patella instability.There have been many surgical procedures for those disorders, such as proximal realignment or distal realignment. Because some biomechanical studies demonstrated that the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is main restraint against lateral dislocation or displacement of the patella, recently, MPFL reconstruction has become the most popular procedure for especially recurrent patellar instability. Many MPFL reconstructions have been reported using artificial ligaments, free semitendinosus, gracilis, quadriceps, or other autogenous tendons. We have performed the MPFL reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon for young and adult patients.However, for habitual or permanent patella instability, only MPFL reconstruction is not enough to obtain normal kinematics of the patella, requiring complicated bony procedures. Because we have experienced several interesting cases of permanent or habitual patellar instability, we would like to demonstrate those cases in this presentation.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Biomechanical Evaluation of the Athlete's Knee: From Basic Science to Clinical Application

Alexis Ortiz,William Micheo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.005

2011-04-01

PM and R

Abstract:Clinical screening to assess knee biomechanical dysfunctions and its comorbidities has been of interest for researchers and clinicians in recent years. Although research in the area of knee injury mechanics has elucidated some of the biomechanical predisposing factors that lead to knee injury, clinicians are still puzzled on how to translate these findings to their clinical practice. Highly instrumented, costly equipment and time-consuming data analyses are some of the difficulties of using 3-dimensional biomechanical analysis in the clinic. However, several biomechanical lower-extremity assessment tools are available and feasible to use in the clinic to guide proper clinical decision making that may impact prevention of knee injuries in the physically active population. The purpose of this article was to review screening techniques for assessment of lower extremity biomechanics and to translate these findings to clinical practice and to bridge the gap between basic science and clinical application. After reading this article, clinicians should be able to (1) identify lower-extremity factors related to knee injury, (2) appropriately select functional tasks to evaluate patients, and (3) make intervention recommendations or appropriate referral to address altered lower-extremity biomechanics related to knee injury.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Clinical and Computational Evaluation of an Anatomic Patellar Component

Lindsay T Kleeman-Forsthuber,Jessell M Owens,Roseann M Johnson,Chadd W Clary,Jacob M Elkins,Douglas A Dennis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.007

Abstract:Background: Anatomic patellar components for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have demonstrated favorable in vivo kinematics. A novel failure mechanism in TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component was observed prompting an investigation to identify patient- and implant-related factors associated with suboptimal performance. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed comparing 100 TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component to 100 gender-, age-, and body mass index-matched patients with a medialized dome component. All surgeries were performed with the same posterior-stabilized TKA system with minimum of 1-year follow-up. Several radiographic parameters were assessed. A separate computational evaluation was performed using finite-element analysis, comparing bone strain energy density through the patella bone remnant. Results: Patients with an anatomic patellar component had significantly higher rates of anterior knee pain (18 versus 2%, P < .001), chronic effusions (18 versus 2%, P < .001), and superior patellar pole fragmentation (36 versus 13%, P < .001) compared to those with a dome component. Radiographically, the anatomic group demonstrated more lateral patellar subluxation (2.3 versus 1.1 mm, P < .001) and lateral tilt (5.4 versus 4.0 mm, P = .013). Furthermore, there were more revisions in the anatomic group (7 versus 3, P = .331). On computational evaluation, all simulations demonstrated increased bone strain energy density at the superior patellar pole with the anatomic patella. Resection thickness <13 mm resulted in over 2-fold higher strain energy density, and negative resection angle of 7° resulted in 6-fold higher superior pole strain energy. Conclusions: Patients with an anatomic patellar component showed higher rates of anterior knee pain, chronic effusion, and superior pole fragmentation compared to patients with a dome patella, with higher superior patellar pole strain energy confirmed on computational evaluation. Avoiding higher resection angles and excessive patellar resection may improve the performance and survivorship of the anatomic patella.
The Treatment Algorithm for Chronic Multiple Ligament Knee Injury

Dinshaw N. Pardiwala,Clevio Desouza,Arzan Jesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01242-z

2024-10-06

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Abstract:Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are a complex group of injuries ideally treated in the acute phase, though delayed presentation is common. Chronic MLKI varies in presentation, requiring individualized management strategies. This review aims to differentiate chronic MLKI types and propose an algorithm that facilitates a tailored treatment plan.

orthopedics
Surgical options for patellar stabilization in the skeletally immature patient

Jack Andrish

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e31805752d0

Abstract:Patellar dislocations in children and youth are estimated to occur in 29 of 100,000 individuals. Recurrent patellar dislocations in the skeletally immature patient are often associated with distinct pathoanatomies, which include patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, and contractures of the central and/or lateral structures of the extensor mechanism. This paper discusses the features of patellar instabilities classified as traumatic versus atraumatic, congenital versus acquired, and fixed dislocations versus habitual dislocations. Suggestions for the surgical management of these various classifications of patellar instabilities, on the basis of the principle of identification and correction of the pathoanatomies unique to the individual, are provided.
Impact of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine use in Australia

R. Booy,J. Jelfs,H. El Bashir,M. Nissen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00828.x

2007-02-01

Abstract:Vaccination response has been impressive, but the hypermutable meningococcus is likely to continue to challenge us.
Regenerative Therapien in der Kardiologie

B. Assmus,V. Schächinger,A. Zeiher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-006-1707-7

2006-11-01

Der Internist

Abstract:

The stiff knee: evaluation and management.

How to manage a native stiff knee

The stiff knee: Causes and cures

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Stiff Knees

Knee osteoarthritis: a review of management options

Evaluation of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness

The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review.

Knee Instability Following Fractures Around the Knee Joint: Diagnostic Dilemma and Management Challenges

Infographic. Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation

Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise

Knee positioning systems for X-ray environment: a literature review

Arthroscopic Management of Stiff Elbow

Topography of the reconstructed pelvic peritoneum after proctocolectomy

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patellar Instability

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Athlete's Knee: From Basic Science to Clinical Application

Clinical and Computational Evaluation of an Anatomic Patellar Component

The Treatment Algorithm for Chronic Multiple Ligament Knee Injury

Surgical options for patellar stabilization in the skeletally immature patient

Impact of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine use in Australia

Regenerative Therapien in der Kardiologie