Abstract:Summary. Background. Lumbar spinal stenosis, which is one of the main causes of disability in older patients, occurs in countries with different levels of income. There has been a surge of endoscopic procedures in recent years, which requires further study. Objective: to compare the results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis of patients operated on using different methods. Materials and Methods. Data from examination and treatment of patients (n=43) who underwent surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis. In the clinical part, the following methods were used: pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS, cm); patients' satisfaction and quality of life were assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire – Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The Oswestry Questionnaire (version 2.0) allowed us to determine the level of impairment in the quality of life of patients in points and as a disability index. Results. In group I (UBE/ULBD), the index of back pain before surgery was 5.3±1.3, in group II (open decompression) it reached 5.8±1.4 and in group III (decompressive laminectomy with transpedicular fixation) it was 5.5±1.1 cm (p>0.05). In the postoperative period, the index of back pain decreased in group I (UBE/ULBD) from 5.3±1.3 cm to 1.4±0.6 cm (p < 0.05), and improvement was observed within 6 months up to 0.5±0.3 cm (p < 0.05); in group II, the index decreased from 5.8±1.4 to 2.1±0.7 cm with positive dynamics over 6 months to 0.6±0.3 cm (p < 0.05); in group III, the level of pain after surgery remained relatively high (4.1±0.8), but there was an improvement to 1.2±0.9 (p < 0.05) within 6 months. The level of pain in the lower extremity in group I (UBE/ULBD) decreased from 4.7±1.1 cm to 2.3±1.0 cm and to 1.1±0.4 cm during 6 months of follow-up (< 0.05); in group II, the level of pain decreased from 5.1±1.2 cm to 1.1±0.9 cm, with improvement to 1.2±0.3 cm within 6 months (< 0.05); in group III, the pain index in the lower extremity before surgery was 5.1±1.2 cm and remained quite high (3.2±1.1 cm) in the early postoperative period and slightly higher (1.4±0.9) compared to other groups after 6 months (<0.05). Assessing the quality of life of patients, the following was found: group I showed positive dynamics, namely ODI improved from 52.7±19.8% before surgery to 10.7±5.4% after 6 months; in group II, ODI improved from 57.9±15.4% before surgery to 15.0±4.1% after 6 months; in group III, ODI was 51.2±16.6% before surgery and 20.3±8.1% after 6 months, which means that at the time of the last survey, patients with transpedicular fixation required additional rehabilitation interventions for recovery. Conclusions. Analysis of the data showed that the indicators of pain in the lower limbs and back, as well as the quality of life in the early and late follow-up periods slightly differed in group I (endoscopic decompression (UBE/UBLD)) and group II (open decompression), but significantly worsened in group III (decompression laminectomy with transpedicular fixation). Decompressive laminectomy with transpedicular fixation requires additional rehabilitation interventions for patients for full recovery.

Recovery of the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire score and walking ability following lumbar spinal stenosis surgery

Evaluation of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Quantifying Satisfaction of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients in Post-lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Establishing Critical JOABPEQ Cutoff Scores

BASIC AND CLINICAL STUDIES ON LUMBAR VERTEBRAL CANAL EXPANSION WITH PRESERVATION OF POSTERIOR LIGAMENTS COMPLEX

Effect of Residual Pain After Posterior Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Two-Year Follow-Up Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study

Validation of P40-N50 peak amplitude variations as a predicting factor for clinical outcomes of posterior decompression for lumbar stenosis

Long-term outcome and associated factors of lumbar decompression, internal fixation and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Three-dimensional Gait Quantitative Analysis in Postoperative Rehabilitation of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Self-Controlled Before-after Study.

Early postoperative physical activity and function: a descriptive case series study of 53 patients after lumbar spine surgery

The Effect of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program on Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease at Short-Term Follow-Up.

Investigation of the correlation between different modes of rehabilitation and outcomes of patients with single-segment lumbar ifxation and fusion surgery:a cohort 12-week study

The Value of Early Postural Training after Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy

The efficacy of 3D gait analysis to evaluate surgical (and rehabilitation) outcome after degenerative lumbar surgery

Rehabilitation Behaviors and the Influencing Factors of Patients with Lumbar Degeneration undergone Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery:A Prospective Cohort Study

The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis

Changes of improvement in upper limb function predict surgical outcome after laminoplasty in 1 year in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study

Revision Surgery for Short Segment Fusion Influences Postoperative Low Back Pain and Lower Extremity Pain: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Patient-Based Evaluation

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Selection of Surgical Treatment and Analysis of Clinical Efficacy in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Rehabilitation Effect of Postoperative Lower-Limb Training on the Patients Undergoing OLIF Surgery: A Retrospective Study