Abstract:Background Optimal selection of vascular access devices is based on multiple factors and is the first strategy to reduce vascular access device‐related complications. This process is dependent on behavioural and human factors. The COM‐B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model was used as a theoretical framework to organize the findings of this systematic review. Methods/Aims To synthesize the evidence on determinants shaping the optimal selection of vascular access devices, using the COM‐B behavioural model as the theoretical framework. Design Systematic review of studies which explore decision‐making at the time of selecting vascular access devices. Data Sources The Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and EbscoHost databases were interrogated to extract manuscripts published up to 31 December 2021, in English or Spanish. Results Among 16 studies included in the review, 8/16 (50%) focused on physical capability, 8/16 (50%) psychological capability, 15/16 (94%) physical opportunity, 12/16 (75%) social opportunity, 1/16 (6%) reflective motivation and 0/16 (0%) automatic motivation. This distribution represents a large gap in terms of interpersonal and motivational influences and cultural and social environments. Specialist teams (teams created for the insertion or maintenance of vascular access devices) are core for the optimal selection of vascular access devices (75% physical capability, 62% psychological capability, 80% physical opportunity and 100% social opportunity). Conclusion Specialist teams predominantly lead all actions undertaken towards the optimal selection of vascular access devices. These actions primarily centre on assessing opportunity and capability, often overlooking motivational influences and social environments. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care A more implementation‐focused professional approach could decrease inequity among patients and complications associated with vascular access devices. Impact Optimal selection of vascular access devices is the primary strategy in mitigating complications associated with these devices. There is a significant disparity between interpersonal and motivational influences and the cultural and social environments. Furthermore, specialized teams play a pivotal role in facilitating the optimal selection of vascular access devices. The study can benefit institutions concerned about vascular access devices and their complications. Reporting Method This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patient or public contribution No Patient or Public Contribution. What does this article contribute to the wider global clinical community? Optimal selection of vascular devices remains a growing yet unresolved issue with costly clinical and patient experience impact. Interventions to improve the optimal selection of vascular devices have focused on training, education, algorithms and implementation of specialist vascular teams; alas, these approaches do not seem to have substantially addressed the problem. Specialist vascular teams should evolve and pivot towards leading the implementation of quality improvement interventions, optimizing resource use and enhancing their role.

Intersection of social determinants of health with ventricular assist device therapy: An integrative review

Social Determinants of Health and Outcomes After Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review

Patient Selection for Ventricular Assist Devices: What Happens in Real Practice?

Home-care educational interventions to prevent complications in patients with Ventricular Assist Devices: a systematic review

Curricular Self‐management for patients on ventricular assist device support decreases depression: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left Ventricular Assist Device in Advanced Refractory Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review of Patient Selection, Surgical Approaches, Complications and Future Perspectives

Assessing the information needs of patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device via analysis of social media forums

Racial And Ethnic Disparities In The Contemporary Utilization Of Left Ventricular Assist Devices In The United States

A new opportunity for patient selection and optimization: Systematic review of cognitive frailty in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation

The Role of Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients With Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review

The Development of Ventricular Assist Devices over the Past 30 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis

Access to Durable LVAD Therapy for Patients With Limited Social Support: Surveying Program-Specific Approaches

Determinants of the optimal selection of vascular access devices: A systematic review underpinned by the COM‐B behavioural model

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients in the Emergency Department with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Multidisciplinary approach for circulatory support in patients with advanced heart failure

Recognition of psychological comorbidity and psychotherapeutic treatment status of ventricular assist device patients

Impact of Patient Distance From Ventricular Assist Device–Implanting Center on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

Association of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation With Adverse Events and Quality of Life

Outcomes and quality of life in patients receiving durable left ventricular assist device with biventricular support