Radical surgical resection with molecular margins is associated with improved survival in IDH wild-type glioblastoma

Elie Massaad,William J Smith,Joseph Bradley,Eric Esposito,Mihir Gupta,Evan Burns,Ryan Burns,José K Velarde,Inka K Berglar,Rajiv Gupta,Maria Martinez-Lage,Jorg Dietrich,Jochen K Lennerz,Gavin P Dunn,Pamela S Jones,Bryan D Choi,Albert E Kim,Matthew Frosch,Fred G Barker,William T Curry,Bob S Carter,Brian V Nahed,Daniel P Cahill,Ganesh M Shankar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae073
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: Survival is variable in patients with glioblastoma IDH wild-type (GBM), even after comparable surgical resection of radiographically detectable disease, highlighting the limitations of radiographic assessment of infiltrative tumor anatomy. The majority of postsurgical progressive events are failures within 2 cm of the resection margin, motivating supramaximal resection strategies to improve local control. However, which patients benefit from such radical resections remains unknown. Methods: We developed a predictive model to identify which IDH wild-type GBMs are amenable to radiographic gross-total resection (GTR). We then investigated whether GBM survival heterogeneity following GTR is correlated with microscopic tumor burden by analyzing tumor cell content at the surgical margin with a rapid qPCR-based method for detection of TERT promoter mutation. Results: Our predictive model for achievable GTR, developed on retrospective radiographic and molecular data of GBM patients undergoing resection, had an area under the curve of 0.83, sensitivity of 62%, and specificity of 90%. Prospective analysis of this model in 44 patients found that 89% of patients were correctly predicted to achieve a residual volume (RV) < 4.9cc. Of the 44 prospective patients undergoing rapid qPCR TERT promoter mutation analysis at the surgical margin, 7 had undetectable TERT mutation, of which 5 also had a GTR (RV < 1cc). In these 5 patients at 30 months follow-up, 75% showed no progression, compared to 0% in the group with TERT mutations detected at the surgical margin (P = .02). Conclusions: These findings identify a subset of patients with GBM that may derive local control benefits from radical resection to undetectable molecular margins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?