‘Habit-like’ attentional prioritisation of reward-related stimuli
Jenny Thao Le,Poppy Watson,Mike Le Pelley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mwjhk
2021-08-17
Abstract:Stimuli associated with rewards (money, drugs, food) can acquire the ability to capture our attention independently of, and indeed contrary to, our goals and intentions. Here, we examined whether this process of attentional prioritisation is ‘habit-like’ – namely, whether attentional prioritisation of reward-related cues is insensitive to changes in the value of the reward itself. To this end, we incorporated an instructed value-switch (Experiment 1), devaluation (Experiment 2a), and ‘super-valuation’ (Experiment 2b) into a visual search task, using eye-tracking to examine attentional prioritisation of stimuli that signal high- and low-value rewards. In Experiment 1, following a value-switch manipulation, we found that attentional prioritisation of a high-value stimulus could not be overcome with knowledge of the new values of outcomes alone. Only when provided with further experience of receiving the outcomes could patterns of attentional prioritisation of high- and low-value stimuli switch, in line with the current value of the outcome they signalled. In Experiment 2a and 2b, we found that attentional prioritisation of high- and low-value stimuli was insensitive to the devaluation of a previously high-value outcome, and super-valuation of a previously low-value outcome, even when participants were provided with further experience of receiving that outcome. Our findings suggest that – under some conditions – attentional prioritisation may fit the definition of a ‘habit-like’ response. By taking a new approach to studying habits in humans, the current findings provide a framework for future work to further understand attentional influences on behaviour.