Time to Empower People With Stroke.

P. van Vliet,V. Pomeroy,S. Wolf,G. Kwakkel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000089

2015-07-01

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Abstract:R ecently at a local hardware store an elderly employee responded to my request (first author) for help to retrieve something from a high shelf. He attempted the task with great enthusiasm, but with much difficulty. His stroke several years before had left him with a partially functioning arm. We talked. His saga was an all too common story of a stroke survivor with great potential, which had not been achieved, through a lack of practice and guidance. Approximately 60% of stroke survivors with severe impairment and 30% of those with mild to moderate impairment have 1 arm that remains nonfunctional 6 months after stroke.1 Advances in neurorehabilitation and even greater intensity of current therapy promise further improvement in arm function, but improvement is limited by the availability of therapy for people after stroke. This problem is global. For example, the UK Stroke Sentinel 2014 audit shows that only 31% of persons with stroke receive the target of 45 minutes of physical therapy 5 days per week during their inpatient stay, and only 24% to 40% of people receive input from a community-based therapy team after discharge. In Australia, 78% people with stroke discharged to the home receive community rehabilitation.2 There is little publicly available information on how many visits people receive from community teams or for how long. In the Netherlands, people receive an average of 9 treatment sessions of 20 to 30 minutes each in their own community, and in the United States outpatient therapy following stroke is guided by the reimbursement policies of the insurer and could range from no treatment to several months of treatment. Stroke care is already expensive, so the provision of community rehabilitation is not likely to increase. Direct health care costs for stroke are an estimated 2.14 billion dollars annually in Australia,3 2.8 billion pounds in the UK,4 1.6 billion euro in the Netherlands5 and 28 billion dollars in the United States.6 The UK National Stroke Audit attributed the majority of these costs to rehabilitation and life after stroke.4 One way forward is to make more efficient use of existing resources. This could be accomplished in several ways. During inpatient care, therapist assistants and carers could be utilized to increase the amount of time available for supervised upper limb practice. In the community sector, people could be encouraged to make greater use of community exercise facilities and exercise services provided by voluntary groups such as stroke support groups. However, health services will probably never have the capacity to ensure that maximum arm function is achieved for everyone with stroke. Consequently, many people will ultimately be responsible for their own arm recovery after stroke. If stroke survivors are to be responsible for directing their own recovery, then it will be important to provide the training and support needed to empower people to take a more active role in the ongoing process of rehabilitation. To achieve this goal people need high self-efficacy,7 which is defined as “people’s beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence over events that affect their lives.”8(p118) Where possible, this behavior can be encouraged from the start of the person’s recovery process. Means of encouraging self-efficacy include joint goal setting, using self-managed workbooks and diaries to record goals and chosen exercises,7 allowing control over the rehabilitation timetable, group training sessions9 and allowing extensive self-administered practice in hospital, to prepare for independent practice later at home. To