Abstract:Abstract Objectives and rationale: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately exposed to environmental chemicals that have been linked to cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, metabolic disease, and premature mortality. Recent evidence suggests that personal care products are a source of such exposures and that these products are more frequently used among Black and Hispanic women. Minoritized populations also tend to experience worse breast cancer outcomes compared to White patients. However, few studies have examined personal care product use and environmental exposures among minority cancer survivors. The aim of the present study was to describe personal care product use and chemical exposures, including ambient and dermal sources of exposure, in a pilot study of Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors. Methods: In November 2020 – December 2021, self-identified Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors aged ≥21 years were recruited in Washington, DC and Hackensack, NJ. Eligible survivors had been diagnosed with primary Stage I-III breast cancer and had completed breast cancer treatment except endocrine therapy. Surveys collected data on demographics, breast cancer diagnosis, personal care product use, and potential covariates. Participants wore silicone wristbands for 1 week for passive sampling of environmental exposures. Extracts from the wristbands were assessed using a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer to detect chemical exposures. Values were adjusted for wear time and wristband size to provide sample concentrations of detected chemicals. Results: Among the 25 study participants, 17 were Black and 8 were Hispanic, with a mean age of 58 years. Most survivors (58%) had been diagnosed with Stage I breast cancer. Survivors reported using perfume (52%), make-up (80%), and nail polish (68%) during the week, with common daily use of facial creams, lotions, or moisturizers (60%) and body creams, lotions, or moisturizers (68%). Drinking bottled water every day (64%) or most days (24%); eating prepared food from a fast food restaurant at least once per week (88%); and eating food reheated in a plastic container at least once per week (71%) were also prevalent. However, the majority of survivors reported never using pesticides indoors (76%) or outdoors (79%). The wristbands detected 60 distinct chemicals. On average, 21.8 chemicals were detected per wristband and 19 chemicals were detected in more than half of the samples. Exposure to flame retardants and pesticides was ubiquitous. All participants were exposed to chemicals found in personal care products and in commercial products. Several of the most commonly detected chemicals, including benzyl salicylate (a UV light absorber and fragrance), diisobutyl phthalate (a plasticizer), and lilial (a perfume), are biologically active compounds with potential genotoxic or endocrine effects. Discussion: Exposure to environmental chemicals was ubiquitous among Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors in DC and New Jersey. Frequent use of personal care products and commercial products suggest an opportunity to reduce potentially harmful exposures. Future studies are needed to investigate the role of environmental chemicals in health outcomes among breast cancer survivors and whether environmental exposures contribute to cancer health disparities. Citation Format: Traci N. Bethea, Jennifer Hicks, Erin Speiser, Adana Llanos, Gail E. Starr, Chiranjeev Dash, Lucile L. Adams-Campbell. A pilot study of personal care product use and exposure to environmental chemicals among Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-06.

Exposure to outdoor ambient air toxics and risk of breast cancer: The multiethnic cohort

Outdoor ambient air pollution and breast cancer survival among California participants of the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Air Pollution and Breast Cancer Incidence in the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Abstract B086: Sociodemographic inequities in carcinogenic industrial air pollution exposures among women in a U.S. cohort

Carcinogenic industrial air pollution and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health AARP Diet and Health Study

Ambient fine particulate matter and breast cancer incidence in a large prospective US cohort

Residential Proximity to Carcinogenic Industrial Air Emissions and Breast Cancer Incidence in a United States-Wide Prospective Cohort

Ambient air emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and female breast cancer incidence in US

Exposure to ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and early-onset female breast cancer in a case-control study in Ontario, Canada

Abstract P3-03-06: A pilot study of personal care product use and exposure to environmental chemicals among Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors

Association of multi-criteria derived air toxics hazard score with lung cancer incidence in a major metropolitan area

The association between ambient air pollutants and pancreatic cancer in the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Abstract A050: The impact of air pollution on aggressive breast cancer prognoses in women of African descent

Multiple xenoestrogen air pollutants and breast cancer risk: statistical approaches to investigate combined exposures effect

Association between long-term ambient air pollution exposure and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract 853: Assessment of racial and ethnic disparities in environmental exposure-related cancer burden

Ethylene oxide emissions and incident breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a U.S. cohort.

Outdoor air pollution and histologic composition of normal breast tissue

The impacts of noise and air pollution on breast cancer risk in European and East Asian populations: Insights from genetic evidence

Association between ambient exposure to PM2.5 and upper aerodigestive tract cancer in Los Angeles

Effects Of Ambient Particulate Matter On Human Breast Cancer: Is Xenogenesis Responsible?