Comparative nutrition, growth and longevity

E. Evans,D. Miller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19680036
1968-09-01
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Abstract:are already aware of all these many difficulties and are ready to accept the convenience of the concept of ‘fitness’ in evolutionary theory, when faced with the necessity to explain. Finally, I think that it is only right to point out that man refuses to conform to many of the generalizations which have arisen in comparative study. All would agree that Adrian Spigelius of Padua in the 16th century did a great disservice to science when he insisted on the formal separation of study of the anatomy of man from comparative studies of anatomy as a whole. I do not wish to be accused of the same attitude of mind when I say that man is a very curious mammal! No doubt D r Cuthbertson in the last paper this afternoon will put man in his correct perspective relative to other mammals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?