Multiple heterotopic ossification of scar following degloving injury: a case report.
Jian Ding,Yun-feng Chen,Chang-qing Zhang,Bing-fang Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12031
2013-01-01
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Heterotopic ossification (HO) is defined as bone formation in locations where there is no skeletal system. Typically, HO occurs during regenerative or degenerative processes such as atherosclerosis within arteries1. It is also a common complication following orthopedic operations such as total hip arthroplasty, the location of HO often being concurrent with the joint operated upon. The incidence of HO is increased in the presence of concomitant central nervous system disorders, including brain injuries and spinal cord lesions2. Scar HO is an uncommon, but important, complication of burn injuries and has occasionally been reported in certain regions such as in the abdominal linea alba after abdominal surgery3, 4. Here, we report a case of open degloving injury in which more than one focus of HO developed. We conducted an extensive review of published reports but found no other reports of HO in patients with degloving injuries. A 62-year-old woman presented with non-healing ulceration that had been present on the left thigh for 3 months. Twenty-one years previously, she had been involved in a traffic accident in which a large portion, almost 5% of the surface area of the left thigh skin, had been openly degloved. The injury had healed after the avulsed skin had been replaced in situ. A circular scar had formed near the knee joint within 4 weeks. She had no concomitant brain or spinal cord injuries. Four years before presenting to us, she had reported feeling two contracture bands under the scar on the anterior and lateral side of the thigh. These bands had gradually manifested as pain and swelling and ulceration had subsequently developed on the lateral side of the thigh. Symptom including pain and swelling emerged 6 months ago, but she had no history of injury. A blister had developed on the anterior band 1 month previously (Fig. 1). The inferior lateral ulcer was covered by hard white plaque. The range of motion of the knee was 0°–120°. Plain radiography of the thigh showed lateral funicular and anterior spotty opaque areas on the site corresponding to the ulceration (Fig. 2). Results of relevant blood biochemistry tests, such as serum calcium concentration, were within normal limits and wound swabs showed no microbial growth. The ulcers, together with peripheral inflammatory tissue, were excised until normal subcutaneous tissue was exposed. The excised tissue showed funicular sclerosis. The surgical incision was sutured after releasing subcutaneous tissue. Histopathological analysis revealed areas of amorphous calcification and lamellar bone in the excised tissue (Fig. 2). No recurrence of calcification was detected during an 18-month follow-up. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Shanghai, China) and written informed consent was obtained from the patient. Macroscopic appearance of surface of HO site on the thigh. (a) There is a blister (white arrow) on the anterior scar band in which HO (0.6 cm × 1.5 cm) was identified. (b) HO (0.8 cm × 2.5 cm and 1.8 cm × 7.5 cm) posterior to the lateral ulcers (white arrow). (c) Excised scar and HO. Plain radiograph and pathological examination (HE stain × 40). (a) Plain radiographs showing spotty opacity on the anterior thigh on a lateral view of the femur (white arrows) and an opaque band laterally on an anterior-posterior view of femur (red circle). (b) Histology showing amorphous calcification and lamellar bone. (c) Calcification in adipose tissue. Heterotopic ossification complicates a variety of pathologic processes and can occur in all kinds of soft tissues, including subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle, in which undifferentiated cells with potential for osteoblastic differentiation are present. The characteristics of scar HO differ from those of HO in orthopedic surgery; HO is more commonly seen in the hip and elbow joints than in scars. Between 2%–7% of patients undergoing hip-joint surgery develop extensive HO5. Although the exact mechanism of development of both types of HO is unknown, it is known that the risk factors for orthopedic HO and scar HO are different. Open reduction and internal fixation, particularly of acetabular fractures, has a high incidence of subsequent HO4. Immobilization of a joint, multiple injuries and concomitant central nervous system injuries increase the incidence of HO. The residual portions of lower limbs can develop HO in wound scars after non-traumatic, traumatic or combat-related amputation; ossification may be induced by the residual bone, rather than by scar tissue6. In spite of an extensive review of published reports, we were unable to find any systematic analysis of risk factors for the various types of scar HO. However, there is some information on the risk factors for HO development after burn injuries. Factors that may be associated with development of HO include skin grafting, active inflammation, infection, complete immobilization and over-vigorous physiotherapy7-9. Moreover, upper midline incisions do not seem to be particularly prone to scar HO10. Chalmers and Rush described three conditions necessary for HO formation: osteogenic precursor cells, inducing agents and a permissive environment11. Each of these three conditions may be different for scar HO than for HO developing after traumatic orthopedic surgery. Scar HO has most commonly been reported after burn injuries and abdominal surgery. Our patient, who had had a degloving injury, presented with symptoms characteristic of those of HO after burn injury rather than of HO after abdominal surgery. All three types of scar HO occur in the absence of periarticular muscle involvement. Several reports state that HO in abdominal scars has characteristics similar to those of actual bone, such as containing normal bone marrow with histological evidence of normal trilineage hematopoiesis4. In contrast, histological examination of the HO in another case of degloving injury showed amorphous calcification similar in structure to the HO found in post-burn cases, as well as chronic ulceration12. However, both types of HO have the same clinical findings; they both present with chronic non-healing ulcers after trivial injuries. Interestingly, the time to emergence of non-healing ulcers, which ranges between 20 and 30 years, is also similar in both types of HO. Moreover, in both instances of HO associated with degloving injury, skin grafting or replacement of degloved skin was performed. This suggests that replacement of degloved skin, as well as skin grafts after burn excision, might contribute to the subsequent occurrence of HO9. Although the precise risk factors for development of scar HO are still unclear, the process of calcification is believed to occur in two stages, hydroxyapatite crystal initiation and propagation, these stages being similar to those of normal physiological processes. According to reports on post-burn HO, consumption of large amounts of protein in burn patients has an adverse effect on calcium balance, leading to the formation of extraosseous calcium deposits and renal stones. However, this phenomenon usually occurs in cases of full-thickness burns over 20% or more of the body surface10, 13 and develops quickly, as early as within 2 weeks of the burn injury14. An inflammatory environment plays an important role not only in HO but also in bone formation during fracture healing15. However, in our case, we considered the inflammation to be the result of the ulceration rather than the cause of the HO, even though pathological examination showed infiltration of inflammatory cells along with calcified tissue. Blood biochemistry tests, such as C-reactive protein concentration, provided no evidence of systemic inflammation. Because scars with contracture bands have a limited blood supply, hypoxia may be involved in the pathophysiological development of HO and facilitate HO formation16. In our patient, both foci of HO were present on the scar of the contracture band; midline abdominal scars may also lie in contracture bands. Contracture bands are susceptible to repeated trivial trauma such as stretch strain, which may initiate differentiation of undifferentiated cells into osteogenic cells17. Trivial trauma in calcified contracture bands can result in skin breakdown and formation of non-healing ulcers. Thus, in cases of degloving injury, the combination of formation of contracture bands after skin grafting and a satisfactory range of motion of the adjacent joint may facilitate HO development. Finally, radiotherapy and administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bisphosphonates (such as etidronate disodium) are standard and useful methods for preventing development of HO after orthopedic surgery and burn injuries. However, these methods may not be useful in cases in which HO develops a very long time after injury. Therefore, total excision of all calcified tissue and taut scarring may be the most reliable method for the treatment of HO in such cases.