Abstract:Importance: Stroke center certification is granted to facilities that demonstrate distinct capabilities for treating patients with stroke. A thorough understanding of structural discrimination in the provision of stroke centers is critical for identifying and implementing effective interventions to improve health inequities for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Objective: To determine whether (1) hospitals in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities (defined using the Area Deprivation Index) are less likely to adopt any stroke certification and (2) adoption rates differ between entry-level (acute stroke-ready hospitals) and higher-level certifications (primary, thrombectomy capable, and comprehensive) by community disadvantage status. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used newly collected stroke center data merged with data from the American Hospital Association, Healthcare Cost Report Information datasets, and the US Census. All general acute hospitals in the continental US between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2022, were included. Data analysis was conducted from July 2023 to May 2024. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the likelihood of hospitals adopting stroke care certification. Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models were used to estimate the likelihood of a hospital becoming stroke certified based on the socioeconomic disadvantage status of the community. Results: Among the 5055 hospitals studied from 2009 to 2022, 2415 (47.8%) never achieved stroke certification, 602 (11.9%) were certified as acute stroke-ready hospitals, and 2038 (40.3%) were certified as primary stroke centers or higher. When compared with mixed-advantage communities, adoption of any stroke certification was most likely to occur near the most advantaged communities (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.44) and least likely near the most disadvantaged communities (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.55). Adoption of acute stroke-ready certification was most likely in mixed-advantage communities, while adoption of higher-level certification was more likely in the most advantaged communities (HR,1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.62) and less likely for the most disadvantaged communities (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.45). After adjusting for population size and hospital capacity, compared with mixed-advantage communities, stroke certification adoption hazard was still 20% lower for relatively disadvantaged communities (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87) and 42% lower for the most disadvantaged communities (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74). Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study examining hospital adoption of stroke services, when compared with mixed-advantage communities, hospitals located in the most disadvantaged communities had a 42% lower hazard of adopting any stroke certification and relatively disadvantaged communities had a 20% lower hazard of adopting any stroke certification. These findings suggest that there is a need to support hospitals in disadvantaged communities to obtain stroke certification as a way to reduce stroke disparities.

Addressing Disparities in Acute Stroke Management and Prognosis

Strategies to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Stroke Preparedness, Care, Recovery, and Risk Factor Control: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Disparities in Emergency Medical Services Use, Prehospital Notification, and Symptom Onset to Arrival in Patients With Acute Stroke

Improving Stroke Risk Factor Management Focusing on Health Disparities and Knowledge Gaps

Addressing disparities in the global epidemiology of stroke

Abstract HUP5: Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Disparities in Acute Stroke Treatment in Community and Academic Hospitals

Abstract TP101: Disposition Disparities: Differences in Discharge and Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Between Racial and Ethnic Groups

Abstract 146: Racial Disparities In The Treatment Of Post-stroke Complications Among Acute Stroke Patients

Abstract WMP58: Underrepresentation of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Stroke Clinical Trials

Provision of Stroke Care Services by Community Disadvantage Status in the US, 2009-2022

Abstract HUP12: Underrepresentation Of Racial And Ethnic Minorities In Stroke Clinical Trials

Abstract 94: Sex Disparities in a Telestroke Network: From Treatment Times to Outcomes

Abstract TP236: Racial Disparities in Young Patients With Ischemic Stroke in Central Connecticut

Abstract HUP10: Sex Disparities In A Telestroke Network: From Treatment Times To Outcomes

Abstract WMP38: Access to Acute Stroke Care: Global Perspective From Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q)

Moving Towards Equity With Digital Health Innovations for Stroke Care

Abstract HUP8: Mobile Stroke Unit Management Associated With Reduction In Racial Disparities In Stroke Treatment Metrics

Abstract 43: Race-Ethnic Specific Trends in Stroke Thrombolysis Care Metrics in Relation to U.S. Target: Stroke Nationwide Quality Improvement Program 2003-2021

Abstract 88: Mobile Stroke Unit Management Associated With Reduction in Racial Disparities in Stroke Treatment Metrics

Abstract WMP37: Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Race and Prehospital Emergency Care and Time to Presentation for Stroke

Abstract TP266: Utilization of Survey, Focus Group, and Referral Data to Plan a Targeted Intervention for Rural Stroke Disparities, Prevention, and Care Access