Abstract:Background: The biomechanical analysis of spine and postural misalignments is important for surgical and non-surgical treatment of spinal pain. We investigated the examiner reliability of sagittal cervical alignment variables compared to the reliability and concurrent validity of computer vision algorithms used in the PostureRay® software 2024. Methods: A retrospective database of 254 lateral cervical radiographs of patients between the ages of 11 and 86 is studied. The radiographs include clearly visualized C1–C7 vertebrae that were evaluated by a human using the software. To evaluate examiner reliability and the concurrent validity of the trained CNN performance, two blinded trials of radiographic digitization were performed by an extensively trained expert user (US) clinician with a two-week interval between trials. Then, the same clinician used the trained CNN twice to reproduce the same measures within a 2-week interval on the same 254 radiographs. Measured variables included segmental angles as relative rotation angles (RRA) C1–C7, Cobb angles C2–C7, relative segmental translations (RT) C1–C7, anterior translation C2–C7, and absolute rotation angle (ARA) C2–C7. Data were remotely extracted from the examiner's PostureRay® system for data collection and sorted based on gender and stratification of degenerative changes. Reliability was assessed via intra-class correlations (ICC), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R2 values. Results: In comparing repeated measures of the CNN network to itself, perfect reliability was found for the ICC (1.0), RMSE (0), and R2 (1). The reliability of the trained expert US was in the excellent range for all variables, where 12/18 variables had ICCs ≥ 0.9 and 6/18 variables were 0.84 ≤ ICCs ≤ 0.89. Similarly, for the expert US, all R2 values were in the excellent range (R2 ≥ 0.7), and all RMSEs were small, being 0.42 ≤ RMSEs ≤ 3.27. Construct validity between the expert US and the CNN network was found to be in the excellent range with 18/18 ICCs in the excellent range (ICCs ≥ 0.8), 16/18 R2 values in the strong to excellent range (R2 ≥ 0.7), and 2/18 in the good to moderate range (R2 RT C6/C7 = 0.57 and R2 Cobb C6/C7 = 0.64. The RMSEs for expert US vs. the CNN network were small, being 0.37 ≤ RMSEs ≤ 2.89. Conclusions: A comparison of repeated measures within the computer vision CNN network and expert human found exceptional reliability and excellent construct validity when comparing the computer vision to the human observer.

The reliability and validity of a novel wearable inertial sensor to measure the cervical proprioception

Reliability and Validity of A Novel Device for Evaluating the Cervical Proprioception

Reliability and usability of a novel inertial sensor-based system to test craniocervical flexion movement control

A Novel Method for Tracking Neck Motions Using a Skin-Conformable Wireless Accelerometer: A Pilot Study

Ab. No. 55 Using Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) for Measuring Neck Range of Motion (ROM) in Persons With Neck Pain: a Validity and Reliability Study

A Novel Device for Assessment and Treatment of Upper Cervical Spine: Test–Retest Reliability Study

Investigating Concurrent Validity Of Inertial Sensors To Evaluate Multiplanar Spine Movement

Reliability of the Moover® 3D Inertial Motion Sensor in Greek Patients With Chronic Neck Pain in a Primary Care Urban Setting

Cervical proprioception and its relationship with neck pain intensity in subjects with cervical spondylosis

Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review

Cervical Sensorimotor Function Tests Using a VR Headset—An Evaluation of Concurrent Validity

Assessing the reliability of a digital inclinometer app for measuring hip, knee, and ankle proprioception

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study

Validity of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU Sensor) for Measurement of Cervical Spine Motion, Compared with Eight Optoelectronic 3D Cameras Under Spinal Immobilization Devices

Intra-Examiner Reliability and Validity of Sagittal Cervical Spine Mensuration Methods Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Test–retest reliability and validity of cervical range of motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer and compass application among individuals with and without neck pain

Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters

S2HM: Self-Powered Spine Health Monitoring Using Piezo/triboelectric Nanogenerators

Correlation between cervical proprioception with the neck length and neck pain in patients of cervical spondylosis

Validity Study for the Cervical Range of Motion Device Used for Lateral Flexion in Patients With Neck Pain

Evaluation of Apparatus and Protocols to Measure Human Passive Neck Stiffness and Range of Motion