Surveying the literature from animal experiments: Systematic review and meta-analysis are important contributions

M. Macleod,S. Ebrahim,I. Roberts
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.331.7508.110-B
2005-07-07
British Medical Journal
Abstract:EDITOR—We agree with Lemon and Dunnett that better methods of surveying the literature on animal experiments are needed,1 but we do not share their confidence in the utility of non-systematic reviews. In clinical trials, systematic review and meta-analysis have made important contributions to our understanding of sources of bias, and the quality of clinical trials has improved as a result. We …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?