Biopsy or Follow-up: AI Improves the Clinical Strategy of US BI-RADS 4A Breast Nodules Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Mei Yi,Yue Lin,Zehui Lin,Ziting Xu,Lian Li,Ruobing Huang,Weijun Huang,Nannan Wang,Yanling Zuo,Nuo Li,Dong Ni,Yanyan Zhang,Yingjia Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.02.003
Abstract:Objectives: To develop predictive nomograms based on clinical and ultrasound features and to improve the clinical strategy for US BI-RADS 4A lesions. Methods: Patients with US BI-RADS 4A lesions from 3 hospitals between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively included. Clinical and ultrasound features were extracted to establish nomograms CE (based on clinical experience) and DL (based on deep-learning algorithm). The performances of nomograms were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curves, calibration curves and decision curves. Diagnostic performances with DL of radiologists were analyzed. Results: 1616 patients from 2 hospitals were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Hundred patients from another hospital made up external validation cohort. DL achieved more optimized AUCs than CE (internal validation: 0.916 vs. 0.863, P < .01; external validation: 0.884 vs. 0.776, P = .05). The sensitivities of DL were higher than CE (internal validation: 81.03% vs. 72.41%, P = .044; external validation: 93.75% vs. 81.25%, P = .4795) without losing specificity (internal validation: 84.91% vs. 86.47%, P = .353; external validation: 69.14% vs. 71.60%, P = .789). Decision curves indicated DL adds more clinical net benefit. With DL's assistance, both radiologists achieved higher AUCs (0.712 vs. 0.801; 0.547 vs. 0.800), improved specificities (70.93% vs. 74.42%, P < .001; 59.3% vs. 81.4%, P = .004), and decreased unnecessary biopsy rates by 6.7% and 24%. Conclusion: DL was developed to discriminate US BI-RADS 4A lesions with a higher diagnostic power and more clinical net benefit than CE. Using DL may guide clinicians to make precise clinical decisions and avoid overtreatment of benign lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?