Results of carotid surgery in elderly patients.

Yvon Kerdiles,Antoine Lucas,L. Podeur,P. Ferte,A. Cardon
1997-08-01
Abstract:METHODS We have evaluated the results of carotid surgery in 252 patients of 75 years and over age (A group) including 281 interventions between June 1st 1985 and December 31st 1993. RESULTS These results have been compared to those obtained in 660 patients of less 75 years (B group), operated on over the same period of time (741 interventions). In the A group, the mean age was 78.2 (from 75 to 89) and 37.3% were women. Nicotinism, obesity and dyslipaemia was significantly more frequent in A group. An angor was shown in 48% in A group (versus 38.8% in B group). In A group, 34.5% (n = 97) of patients were neurologically asymptomatic against 41.7% (n = 309) in B group. Four patients aged over 75 died (1.42% per intervention), one from myocardial infarction, the other from postoperative stroke. Three other patients showed a non regressive postoperative neurological deficiency. The Cumulated Rate of Mortality Morbidity (CRMM) in A group is then 2.49% per intervention. It does not significantly differ from B group results: mortality = 1.48% (n = 11, 10 of neurological origin), CRMM = 3.23% per intervention. We counted 4 myocardial infarctions (1.58%) in A group and 5 (0.75%) in B group. The mean time after the interventions was 58 months. The five years actuarial survival is 73% of A group patients and 85% for B group patients. In A group patients, 44% of deaths are of coronary origin and 35% in B group patients. The actuarial rate of people free from neurological deficiency, after 5 years, is 90.9% in A group and 92.4% in B group. CONCLUSIONS In this study, age does not seem to be a risk factor in carotid surgery. The elderly patients must be selected according to the same criteria as the under 75, save the estimation of intellectual faculties and autonomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?