The status of brain injury rehabilitation.

G. Giles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/AJOT.48.3.199

1994-03-01

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract:ThiS is the first srecial issue of AjOr on rehabilitation after acquired bl'ain injury. This somewhat surprising fact may be panly due to the relative youth or brain injury rehabilitation as a srecialry. In 1980 there were fewer than 12 centers in the United States that specialized in brain injury rehabilitation, but this field has grown rapidly over the last 20 years with, more recently, some reduction in services. This paper attempts to account for some of these changes and describes factors that have led to the increased scrutiny of brain injury rehabilitation in the managed care environment. An overview of the recent history of brain injmy rehabilitation is prOVided, and areas of panicular interest to occupational therapists are emrhasized. By focusing on what we have \earned aboul persons with brain injury, we will be in a better rosition to advocate for the provision of ;,Jdequate <Inel cost-effective services. Every history. but ranicularly one wriuen b)' a panicipant, is panial and necessarily incomplete. This historical ovelview provides one view as [0 how we have reached our current position. In this raper and throughout this srecia I issue, the rerm hrain injury predominantly refers to traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI includes oren and closed and focal and diffuse types of injuries. The prototypical TBI patient is a young adult wirh a closed head injur)' secondary to a motor vehicle accident, spons injury, or fall. Brain damage caused by anoxia, poisoning. and encephalitis may have similar physical and functional effects and much of what can be said of TBI applies to these pathologies. Unless ir is sreciflcally included. rhis definition excludes ccrebrova~cular accident (eVA), which has in Illany respeers a different clinical rresen[3tion.