Abstract:Loorits (2014) identifies the solution to the hard problem of consciousness in the possibility of fully analyzing seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness in structural terms. However, research on consciousness conducted in recent decades has failed to bridge the explanatory gap between the brain and conscious mind. One reason why the explanatory gap cannot be filled, and consequently the problem remains hard, is that experience and neural structure are too different or "distant" to be directly compatible. Conversely, structural aspects of consciousness can be found in phenomenal experience. One possible alternative, therefore, is to seek the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness not in the neural substrate, but within consciousness itself, through a phenomenal analysis of the qualitative aspects of experience, starting from its simplest forms. An essential premise is to reformulate the explanandum of consciousness, which is usually attributed to qualia and what it is like to be in a certain state. However, these properties do not allow us to identify the fundamental aspects of phenomenal experience. Sensations such as the redness of red or the painfulness of pain are inseparable from the context of the experience to which they belong, making qualia appear as phenomenal artifacts. Furthermore, the simplest qualitative aspects can be found in early vision. They are involved in perceptual organization and necessarily have relational significance. The unitary set of qualities found in early vision—such as those related to being an object, background or detail—constitutes the explanandum of the simplest forms of consciousness and seems to imply a justifying structure. Although early vision is characterized by interdependent qualitative components that form a unitary whole, we cannot find in it the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness. Phenomenal appearance alone does not seem sufficient to identify a unitary structure of consciousness. However, the closeness of these characteristics to a unitary structure prompts us to delve into less explored territory, using the components of experience also as possible explanans.

Towards a structural turn in consciousness science

What is a Mathematical Structure of Conscious Experience?

The Closure of the Physical, Consciousness and Scientific Practice

An ESR Framework for the Study of Consciousness

Neurophenomenal structuralism. A philosophical agenda for a structuralist neuroscience of consciousness

Mathematical Models of Consciousness

Consciousness and the structuring property of typical data

Consciousness Viewed in the Framework of Brain Phase Space Dynamics, Criticality, and the Renormalization Group

Approaching the nature of consciousness through a phenomenal analysis of early vision. What is the explanandum?

Sleep, Neuroengineering and Dynamics

Towards new concepts for a biological neuroscience of consciousness

Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments

A Non-equilibrium Thermodynamic Framework of Consciousness

From the origins to the stream of consciousness and its neural correlates

Scientific Structuralism: Presentation and Representation

The meta-problem and the transfer of knowledge between theories of consciousness: a software engineer's take

Active Inference as a Computational Framework for Consciousness

The Confluence of Perceiving and Thinking in Consciousness Phenomenology

Toward a standard model of consciousness: Reconciling the attention schema, global workspace, higher-order thought, and illusionist theories

Structured dynamics in the algorithmic agent

Consciousness beyond neural fields: expanding the possibilities of what has not yet happened