Steroid-induced inhibition of nucleoside uptake in isolated mouse thymocytes.

D. Gagne,F. Homo,D. Duval

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(80)90388-0

1980-12-02

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Outcomes of Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Double Crush Syndrome.

Hai-Jiang Ren,Xuan Ye,Pei-Yang Li,Yun-Dong Shen,Yan-Qun Qiu,Wen-Dong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.1889463

2024-01-01

British Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract:Background Double crush syndrome (DCS) of the ulnar nerve, including cubital tunnel syndrome with ulnar tunnel syndrome (UTS), is uncommon. This study compares the postoperative outcomes of patients with isolated ulnar tunnel syndrome versus those with double crush syndrome of the elbow and ulnar tunnel. Methods This study enrolled 22 patients: 12 underwent cubital tunnel surgery and ulnar tunnel surgery (double crush group); and 10 underwent only ulnar tunnel decompression (isolated UTS group). Postoperative effect evaluation of patients in both groups after at least 2.6 years (mean, 5.1 years and 5.7 years, respectively). Statistical analysis compared postoperative function, physical examination, and patient-reported satisfaction between groups. Results In terms of postoperative grip strength, there was no difference between the postoperative states of the two groups (0.88 +/- 0.04 versus 0.87 +/- 0.05), while there was statistical difference in terms of the increment of the grip strength (p = 0.036); the two-point discrimination of isolated UTS group is better than the double crush group (90% versus 83.3%); double crush patients reported lower satisfaction than the UTS group (90% versus 83.3%). Conclusions At a minimum of 2.6 years after the nerve decompression, the patients of isolated UTS group are likely to have superior grip strength increment than patients with a history of double crush surgery, and there is no big difference in the final recovery situation. The sensation and satisfaction of isolated UTS group after nerve release were better compared with patients following double crush surgery.
Can listeners hear how many singers are singing? The effect of listener's experience, vibrato, onset, and formant frequency on the perception of number of simultaneous singers.

M. Erickson,C. Gaskill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.04.011

IF: 2.3

2012-11-01

Journal of Voice

Abstract:
Long-Term Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: A Multicenter Pragmatic Study

Demetrio Aguila,Matthew Kirsch,Brett Kindle,Paul Paterson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.10.001

2023-11-22

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the 1-year clinical outcomes of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) performed in a large, real-world population of patients enrolled in a multicenter registry. Methods: All patients who participated in a postmarket registry study of CTR-US outcomes and provided both preoperative and 1-year postoperative data were included. Main outcomes were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QDASH), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) scores at 1 year. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of patient and procedural factors on 1-year outcomes. Results: A total of 300 patients (341 hands) were treated by 25 different physicians, including 41 (13.7%) treated with simultaneous bilateral procedures. Mean patient age was 54.2 years, 63% were women, 24% had ≥2 comorbidities, and 54% had symptoms for >2 years. Mean QDASH scores decreased from 40.6 ± 20.6 to 12.2 ± 18.3 at 1 year, BCTQ-SSS scores decreased from 3.0 ± 0.7 to 1.5 ± 0.7 at 1 year, and BCTQ-FSS scores decreased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 1.4 ± 0.6 at 1 year. Women improved more than men at 1 year for QDASH, BCTQ-SSS, and BCTQ-FSS. Patients treated with simultaneous bilateral procedures had similar 1-year outcomes to those treated with unilateral procedures. Multiple other factors including high body mass index, diabetes status, current tobacco use, rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis, operation in the dominant hand, higher comorbidity burden, and concurrent ipsilateral procedures did not significantly affect 1-year outcomes. Two patients had revision surgeries in addition to one patient with an infection, and one with a suspected small finger tendon injury. Conclusions: Patients treated with CTR-US in real-world conditions report significant and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and function that are maintained at 1 year. The results are consistent across broad patient demographics and are not affected by performing simultaneous bilateral procedures. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years

Dafang Zhang,Peter Ostergaard,Charles Cefalu,Matthew Hall,Brandon E Earp,Philip Blazar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719857815

Abstract:Background: The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in a cohort of patients with preoperatively unrecordable median nerve sensory and motor potentials in comparison with historical controls at minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively identified 1297 patients who underwent CTR at a tertiary care referral center from July 2008 to June 2013. After exclusion criteria and review of available preoperative nerve conduction studies, 24 patients who underwent CTR with preoperative unrecordable sensory and motor nerve potentials were identified. Fifteen living, mentally capable patients were contacted by telephone for follow-up. Our primary outcome measure was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Secondary outcome measures included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, pain on a 0 to 10 Likert scale, and satisfaction on a 0 to 10 Likert scale. Results: Our response rate was 80% (12 out of 15) of eligible patients. Mean follow-up was 6.9 years in our study (range, 5.4-9.5 years). The mean BCTQ symptom score was 1.4, and the mean BCTQ functional score was 1.8. Mean DASH score was 15.2. On average, patient-reported pain was 0.3 and satisfaction was 8.3. No difference was found in outcomes of CTR in patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome compared with historical means. Conclusions: Patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not have worse long-term patient-reported outcomes after CTR compared with the general population. Unrecordable nerve potentials are not a contraindication for CTR.
Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release

Tiffany N Castillo,Jeffrey Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.027

Abstract:Purpose: This study analyzes the long-term postoperative symptoms and functional outcomes of patients who underwent either traditional open (single-incision) or 2-incision carpal tunnel release (CTR). Because 2-incision CTR preserves the superficial nerves and subcutaneous tissue between the thenar and hypothenar eminences, it may account for fewer postoperative symptoms and improved functional recovery. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent either open or 2-incision CTR for isolated carpal tunnel syndrome between 2005 and 2008 by a single surgeon. Patients with a history of hand trauma or confounding comorbidities were excluded. We mailed a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire and a Brigham and Women's Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BWCTQ) to all eligible participants. Data from the completed questionnaires were analyzed using independent t-tests and Pearson's correlation. Significance was set at p = .05. Results: A total of 82 patients (106 hands; 27 men and 55 women; mean age, 60.5 y) were eligible to participate. Of these, 51 patients (63 hands; 20 men and 31 women; mean age, 61.1 y) responded (62% response rate). The mean duration of follow-up was 22 months (range, 12-37 mo; SD 7.3 mo). The 2-incision group mean BWCTQ Symptom Severity Scale score (1.13, SD 0.25) was significantly lower than the open group mean Symptom Severity Scale score (1.54, SD 0.70, p = .001). The 2-incision group mean BWCTQ Functional Status Scale score (1.24, SD 0.51) was significantly lower than the open group mean Functional Status Scale score (1.71, SD 0.76, p = .008). The 2-incision group mean DASH score (5.10, SD 12.03) was significantly lower than the open group mean DASH score (16.28, SD 19.98, p = .01). Conclusions: Patients treated with 2-incision CTR reported statistically significantly less severe long-term postoperative symptoms and improved functional status compared with patients treated with traditional open CTR. Future prospective studies with objective measures are needed to further investigate the difference in outcomes found between these 2 CTR techniques. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.
Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Combined with Cervical Nerve Root Compression

Min-tao Tian,Lu Bai,Sen-yao Shao,Tian-bing Wang,Bao-guo Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-167x.2012.06.006

2012-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To analyze the clinical curative effect of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) combined with cervical nerve root compression and to explore the differences between CTS combined with cervical nerve root compression and simple CTS in the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment.METHODS:From February 2004 to October 2010, 93 cases (120 sides) were selected among the patients (21 males and 72 females) adopted to our department and primarily diagnosed as CTS, of whom 29 had cervical nerve root compression. Neurolysis of peripheral nerve was conducted in the 93 cases, and the mean follow-up period was 16 months.RESULTS:The results of the improvements of symptoms and signs after operation were evaluated by the British Medical Research Council (BMRC). According to the BMRC scores, we divided the patients into three stages: excellent, good and none. In the 93 patients, 29 were with visible nerve root compression in radiograph or magnetic resonance imaging, in whom the excellent rate was 86.21%, and the good rate 13.79%, meanwhile in the patients without nerve root compression, the excellent rate was 90.63% and the good rate 9.37%.CONCLUSION:In the case of CTS combined with cervical nerve root compression, our findings are as follows: Firstly, neurolysis of peripheral nerve has an accurate curative effect; Secondly, neurolysis of peripheral nerve may decline the symptoms of nerve root compression; Thirdly, patients with nerve root compression are obviously more common in men, therefore, we should pay attention to the double crash when it comes to the male patient.
Early Postoperative Improvement in Sleep and Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release

Steven R. Niedermeier,Robert J. Pettit,Travis L. Frantz,Kara Colvell,Hisham M. Awan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718793984

2018-08-16

HAND

Abstract:Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We sought to assess the subjective improvement in preoperative symptoms related to CTS, particularly those affecting sleep, and describe opioid consumption postoperatively. Methods: All patients undergoing primary carpal tunnel release (CTR) for electromyographically proven CTS were studied prospectively. All procedures were performed by hand surgery fellowship–trained adult orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the outpatient setting. Patients underwent either endoscopic or open CTR from June 2017 to December 2017. Outcomes assessed were pre- and postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), visual analog scale (VAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores as well as postoperative pain control. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. At 2 weeks, all showed significant ( P < .05) improvement in QuickDASH scores. At 6 weeks, 40 patients were available for follow-up. When compared with preoperative scores, QuickDASH (51 vs 24.5; P < .05), VAS (6.7 vs 2.9; P < .05), and PSQI (10.4 vs 6.4; P < .05) scores continued to improve when compared with preoperative scores. At 2-week follow-up, 39 patients responded to the question, “How soon after your carpal tunnel surgery did you notice an improvement in your sleep?” Seventeen patients (43.6%) reported they had improvement in sleep within 24 hours, 12 patients (30.8%) reported improvement between 2 and 3 days postoperatively, 8 patients (20.5%) reported improvement between 4 and 5 days postoperatively, and 2 patients (5.1%) reported improvement between 6 and 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates rapid and sustained improvement in sleep quality and function following CTR.
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Carpal Ligament Release via Different Approaches in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Xiaochen Shi,Jiaan Zhu,Guicheng Li,Xuesong Gu,Hailin Xu

IF: 4.396

Pain Physician

Abstract:Background: Ultrasound-guided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) needle release has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, no existing evidence has investigated the comparative efficacy of different release approaches. Objective: To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via different approaches for patients with mild to moderate CTS over a 12-month follow-up. Study design: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient clinic at a university hospital. Methods: Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate CTS (> 3 months' duration) were randomly assigned to either the long-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus long-axis TCL needle release) or the short-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus short-axis TCL needle release) in a one-to-one ratio. The primary outcomes were the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional severity scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). The secondary outcomes were electrophysiological studies, including distal motor latency (DML) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN), and patient-reported successful clinical response. Assessments were performed before treatment and at one, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Results: A total of 60 patients (30 per group) completed the trial. Compared to the baseline, both groups exhibited improvement in SSS, FSS, SNCV, DML, and CSA at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences for SSS, FSS, and SNCV at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05), and CSA at each follow-up time point (P < 0.05). Compared to the short-axis group, the long-axis group exhibited more improvement in SSS and FSS at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), and in SNCV and DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). Although the long-axis patients exhibited more improvement in their wrists' CSAs, the intergroup differences were nonsignificant at all follow-up time points (P > 0.05). Four patients in the short-axis group experienced recurrent symptoms and underwent surgery at 12 months, whereas no recurrence was observed in the long-axis group. Limitations: A relevant future trial with a longer follow-up period than this one used is still necessary. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via the long-axis approach appears to be more effective than the short-axis approach for treating mild to moderate CTS.
Complete remission of childhood-onset epilepsy: stability and prediction over two decades.

A. Berg,K. Rychlik,S. Levy,F. Testa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu294

2014-12-01

Abstract:The ultimate seizure outcome of childhood epilepsy is complete resolution of all seizures without further treatment. How often this happens and how well it can be predicted early in the course of epilepsy could be valuable in helping families understand the nature of childhood epilepsy and what to expect over time. In the Connecticut study of epilepsy, a prospective cohort of 613 children with newly-diagnosed epilepsy (onset age 0-15 years), complete remission, ≥5 years both seizure-free and medication-free, was examined as a proxy of complete seizure resolution. Predictors at initial diagnosis were tested. Information about seizure outcomes within 2 years and from 2-5 years after diagnosis was sequentially added in a proportional hazards model. The predictive value of the models was determined with logistic regression. Five hundred and sixteen subjects were followed ≥10 years. Three hundred and twenty-eight (63%) achieved complete remission; 23 relapsed. The relapse rate was 8.2 per 1000 person-years and decreased over time: 10.7, 6.7, and 0 during first 5 years, the next 5 years, and then >10 years after complete remission (P=0.06 for trend). Six participants regained complete remission; 311 (60%) were in complete remission at last contact. Baseline factors predicting against complete remission at last contact included onset age≥10 years (hazard ratio=0.55, P=0.0009) and early school or developmental problems (hazard ratio=0.74, P=0.01). Factors predicting for complete remission were uncomplicated epilepsy presentation (hazard ratio=2.23, P<0.0001), focal self-limited epilepsy syndrome (hazard ratio=2.13, P<0.0001), and uncharacterized epilepsy (hazard ratio=1.61, P=0.04). Remission (hazard ratio=1.95, P<0.0001) and pharmaco-resistance (hazard ratio=0.33, P<0.0001) by 2 years respectfully predicted in favour and against complete remission. From 2 to 5 years after diagnosis, relapse (hazard ratio=0.21, P<0.0001) and late pharmaco-resistance (hazard ratio=0.21, P=0.008) decreased and late remission (hazard ratio=2.40, P<0.0001) increased chances of entering complete remission. The overall accuracy of the models increased from 72% (baseline information only), to 77% and 85% with addition of 2-year and 5-year outcomes. Relapses after complete remission are rare making this an acceptable proxy for complete seizure resolution. Complete remission after nearly 20 years is reasonably well predicted within 5 years of initial diagnosis.
Differences in the Postoperative Outcomes According to the Primary Treatment Options Chosen by Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment

Soo Min Cha,Hyun Dae Shin,Jae Sung Ahn,Jae Won Beom,Dong Yeol Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000598

Abstract:Purpose: We prospectively analyzed the differences in the preoperative status and final outcomes between patients with or without the motivation for prompt surgery after a recent diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients were enrolled and followed up from a cohort of 220 patients who were diagnosed with CTS between 2011 and 2013. Basic demographic factors, including the occupational features, were investigated in group 1 (n = 52, conservative treatment followed by surgery) and group 2 (n = 100, surgery immediately after diagnosis). The preoperative electrodiagnosis, clinical items by Graham, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcomes questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores, and grip/pinch strengths were evaluated, and the degree of improvements was compared. Results: The onset period of the symptoms or signs, as well as the time from the diagnosis to surgery, was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2. In group 1, nonprofessional, simple, and repetitive jobs were more prevalent; however, the professional category was more common in group 2. The preoperative distributions among the electrodiagnostic grades were not different in both groups. Most of the clinical items by Graham were more definitively improved in group 2. DASH improvement at the final follow-up was meaningfully more in group 2 (34 ± 5.3) than in group 1 (29 ± 6.5). Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire showed a similar trend regarding the DASH score (preoperative, improvement at the final follow-up) with statistical significance. The increase in grip/pinch strength was also greater in group 2. Conclusions: Most patients, who refused/delayed surgery as the initial treatment for CTS, were not improved by conservative options. Eventually, carpal tunnel release was performed; however, the overall outcomes were inferior compared with those of the groups who agreed to operative treatment as the initial option.
Simultaneous Versus Staged Surgery for Double Crush Syndrome of Cervical Radiculopathy and Peripheral Nerve Compression at the Wrist: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Vadim A Byvaltsev,Andrei A Kalinin,Roman A Polkin,Alexander V Kuharev,Marat S Almatov,Marat A Aliyev,K Daniel Riew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004950

2024-10-01

Abstract:Study design: Retrospective single-center study. Objectives: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment in patients with double crush syndrome associated with cervical radiculopathy and upper limb peripheral nerve compression after staged and simultaneous operations. Summary of background data: Currently, choosing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for treating patients with double crush syndrome remains unresolved. Methods: The study included 79 patients with double crush syndrome (cervical radiculopathy and syndrome of Guyon's canal or Carpal tunnel syndrome). Two independent groups were studied: In the Staged Group (n=35), we performed a cervical decompression with stabilization and peripheral nerve decompression at separate days due to ongoing clinical symptoms (average interval between interventions being 22 (18;26) days). In the simultaneous group (n=33), we performed both the cervical spine surgery as well as the peripheral nerve procedures in one surgical session. Total operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, complications, and clinical data (NDI score, SF-36, VAS neck pain score, VAS arm pain score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Macnab scale) were compared. We used the Mann-Whitney (MW) test for intergroup comparisons, the Wilcoxon criterion for dependent samples, and the Fisher exact test for binomial parameters. Results: There was a significantly lower operative time, duration of inpatient treatment, and temporary disability in the simultaneous group (P=0.01, P=0.04, and P=0.006, respectively). Comparative analysis did not reveal significant intergroup differences using NDI, VAS, and DASH ( P >0.05), whereas, at discharge, significantly better clinical parameters were appreciated for the simultaneous group using SF-36 and Macnab scores ( P =0.04 and P =0.03, respectively). At the last follow-up, an intra-group analysis revealed comparable clinical effectiveness between the two approaches ( P >0.05). Conclusion: Comparison of the effectiveness of simultaneous and staged surgery revealed comparable long-term clinical outcomes. However, simultaneous surgery conveys clinically important advantages in terms of surgical time, anesthesia duration, length of hospitalization, and patient disability. Level of evidence: 3.
Cervical myeloradiculopathy with entrapment neuropathy: a study based on the double-crush concept

H Baba,Y Maezawa,K Uchida,N Furusawa,M Wada,S Imura,N Kawahara,K Tomita

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100539

1998-05-29

Spinal Cord

Abstract:In an attempt to formulate a standardised approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with the double-crush syndrome, we reviewed 65 surgical cases (39 men and 26 women) with cervical myeloradiculopathy associated with entrapment neuropathy in the arm by examining the clinical features, results of nerve conduction velocity studies and distribution of the vertebral levels of compression. Fifty-three patients (average age, 43 years) presented with a carpal tunnel syndrome at the wrist and cervical lesions (41 with spondylosis and 12 with ossified posterior longitudinal ligament), while 12 had a cubital tunnel syndrome at the elbow with cervical lesions (eight with spondylosis and four with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament). In the former group, the lesions were found mostly at C5–6 and C6–7 levels, while in the latter group involvement of C6–7 was frequently observed. Two patients in each group required additional cervical decompression after carpal or cubital tunnel release. A retrospective review of our patients suggested that it is reasonable to pursue an accurate diagnosis followed by treatment based on individual neurological and electrophysiological findings, but taking into consideration the significant level of physical impairment associated with cord compromise, we believe that it may be reasonable to perform a cervical decompression rather than peripheral nerve release in such cases. Our findings suggest that one should be aware of a double-crush during examination of patients complaining of neck and hand problems.

clinical neurology,rehabilitation
Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery

Sandra V Kotsis,Kevin C Chung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.10.006

Abstract:Purpose: Symptom resolution and functional improvement are the 2 primary reasons for patients to seek treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study aimed to measure the responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) when evaluating outcomes after carpal tunnel surgery. Methods: Fifty patients prospectively completed the MHQ and the DASH before and 6 months after open carpal tunnel release. Data were analyzed using paired t tests and responsiveness to clinical change was calculated by using standardized response means (SRMs). Results: All domains of the MHQ significantly improved after carpal tunnel release: the pain scale had a large SRM of 0.9 and the function scale showed medium responsiveness of 0.6. The combined function/symptom scale of the DASH significantly improved after surgery; the SRM revealed a medium effect of 0.7. Conclusions: The MHQ and the DASH are both responsive in measuring outcomes of carpal tunnel surgery. The MHQ has subscales that can measure symptom and function improvement independently. The MHQ and the DASH can be used for outcomes research related to carpal tunnel surgery with the advantage of also being useful for assessing and comparing outcomes for various other hand disorders.
Pre-operative Two-Point Discrimination Predicts Response to Carpal Tunnel Release

Lauren E Wessel,Charles M Ekstein,Danielle C Marshall,Aaron Z Chen,Daniel A Osei,Duretti T Fufa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09694-y

Abstract:Background: Limited evidence informs whether pre-operative values of two-point discrimination (2PD) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome predict response to surgery. Questions/purposes: The primary aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of pre-operative 2PD scores on outcomes following carpal tunnel release (CTR). In particular, we sought to evaluate whether a clinically relevant 2PD threshold exists that can predict symptomatic response after surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent CTR between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Static 2PD scores in each digit, as well as Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Levine-Katz scores, were collected from pre- and post-operative records. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between pre-operative 2PD, early post-operative 2PD, and patient-reported outcome scores. Poor 2PD was defined as 2PD greater than 10 mm. Results: Eighty-nine hands in 73 patients with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years were analyzed. Mean pre- and post-operative 2PD was 7.2 mm and 6.4 mm, respectively, in the most affected digit when measurable. Twenty patients had poor 2PD scores pre-operatively and 14 post-operatively. There was a positive correlation between pre- and early post-operative 2PD scores but no correlation between pre-operative 2PD score and final post-operative functional scores. Only 30% of patients with poor pre-operative 2PD scores demonstrated improvement, compared with 69% of patients with measurable 2PD. Conclusion: We found that greater pre-operative 2PD scores predicted greater early post-operative 2PD scores but did not lead to worse functional outcome scores post-operatively. Patients with poor pre-operative 2PD scores were likely to demonstrate improvement in functional outcomes scores, while having less reliable improvement in 2PD after CTR. Patients with poor 2PD should be counseled that improvement of tactile perception is less predictable.
Comparison of the Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Surgery and Nonsurgical Intervention in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qiyun Shi,Pavlos Bobos,Emily A. Lalone,Laura Warren,Joy C. MacDermid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718787892

2018-07-17

HAND

Abstract:Background: The objective of the study is to examine the short-term and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared with conservative treatment (ie, splint, steroid injection, or physical therapy). Methods: Two reviewers searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PEDro up to September 2017. Quality appraisal and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Patient self-reported functional and symptom changes, as well as improvement of electrophysiological studies, were assessed as outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed in RevMan. Results: From 1438 studies identified after searching, 10 remained for analysis after exclusion criteria were applied. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that surgical interventions were superior to splint or steroid injection at 6 months with a weighted mean difference of 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.44) for functional status and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.07-1.21) for symptom severity. The surgical group had better nerve conduction outcomes at 6 months (0.57 [95% CI, 0.05-0.50] ms). No significant differences were observed at 3 or 12 months. Conclusions: Both surgical and conservative interventions provide treatment benefits in CTS. Further studies on long-term outcome are needed.
Simultaneous Versus Staged Surgery For Double Crush Syndrome Of Cervical Radiculopathy And Peripheral Nerve Compression At The Wrist

Vadim A Byvaltsev,Andrei A Kalinin,Roman A Polkin,Alexander V Kuharev,Marat S Almatov,Marat A Aliyev,K Daniel Riew,Vadim A. Byvaltsev,Andrei A. Kalinin,Roman A. Polkin,Alexander V. Kuharev,Marat S. Almatov,Marat A. Aliyev,K. Daniel Riew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004950

IF: 3.241

2024-02-02

Spine

Abstract:Study Design. Retrospective single-center study. Objectives. to evaluate the results of surgical treatment in patients with double crush syndrome associated with cervical radiculopathy and upper limb peripheral nerve compression after staged and simultaneous operations. Summary of Background Data. Currently, choosing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in treating patients with double crush syndrome remains unresolved. Methods. The study included 79 patients with double crush syndrome (cervical radiculopathy and syndrome of Guyon’s canal or Carpal tunnel syndrome). Two independent groups were studied: In the Staged Group (n=35), we performed a cervical decompression with stabilization and peripheral nerve decompression at separate days due to ongoing clinical symptoms (average interval between interventions being 22 (18;26) days). In the Simultaneous Group (n=33), we performed both the cervical spine surgery, as well as the peripheral nerve procedures in one surgical session. Total operative time, estimate blood loss, length of hospitalization, complications and clinical data (NDI score, SF-36, VAS neck pain score, VAS arm pain score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Macnab scale) were compared. We used the Mann-Whitney (MW) test for intergroup comparisons, Wilcoxon criterion for dependent samples, and Fisher’s exact test for binomial parameters. Results. There was a significantly lower operative time, duration of inpatient treatment and temporary disability in the Simultaneous Group ( P =0.01, P =0.04 and P =0.006 respectively). Comparative analysis did not reveal significant intergroup differences using NDI, VAS and DASH ( P >0.05), whereas, at discharge, significantly better clinical parameters were appreciated for the Simultaneous Group using SF-36 and Macnab scores ( P =0.04 and P =0.03, respectively). At Last Follow-up, an intra-group analysis revealed comparable clinical effectiveness between the two approaches ( P >0.05). Conclusion. Comparison of the effectiveness of simultaneous and staged surgery revealed comparable long-term clinical outcomes. However, simultaneous surgery conveys clinically important advantages in terms of surgical time, anesthesia duration, length of hospitalization and patient disability. Level of Evidence. 3

clinical neurology,orthopedics
A randomized clinical trial on the changing of median nerve cross-sectional area and pain after extracorporeal shock wave and low-level laser therapy added to conventional physical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

Amirhossein Ghasemi,Gholam Reza Olyaei,Hossein Bagheri,Mohammad Reza Hadian,Shohreh Jalaei,Khadijeh Otadi,Kazem Malmir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.009

IF: 1.908

2024-01-27

Journal of Hand Therapy

Abstract:Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common mononeuropathy in the upper limb. It remains uncertain whether adding extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) or low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to conventional treatment benefits CTS patients. Purpose This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and LLLT in conjunction with conventional treatments (including carpal mobilization, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , and ultrasound) on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve and pain in mild-to-moderate CTS patients. Study Design This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with registration number IRCT20220504054734N1. Methods Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned using block balanced randomization to receive either four sessions of ESWT or 10 sessions of LLLT in addition to 10 sessions of conventional treatments over 2 weeks. Patients received numbered closed envelopes indicating their treatment group. CSA (primary) and pain (secondary) in 18 patients who completed the treatment were assessed at baseline and after 2 weeks by a blinded assessor. Paired and independent sample t -tests were used for analyses due to the normal distribution of data was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnoff. Cohen's d effect size was used to assess the intervention's magnitude. Results Both ESWT and LLLT groups showed significant improvements in CSA ( p = 0.002) and pain ( p < 0.001) from baseline to posttreatment. CSA improvement was moderate for ESWT (mean difference: 1.2, 95% CI 0.51-1.9) and mild for LLLT (mean difference: 0.76, 95% CI 0.4-1.14). Conversely, pain improvement was substantial in both groups (ESWT: mean difference 4.4, 95% CI 3.6-5.3; LLLT: mean difference 4.4, 95% CI 3.7-5.2). No substantial differences between ESWT and LLLT were observed, highlighting their comparable efficacy. Conclusion The addition of either LLLT or ESWT to conventional treatment effectively reduced pain and median nerve CSA in mild-to-moderate CTS. The absence of significant differences between ESWT and LLLT indicates their comparable efficacy in pain relief and CSA reduction.

surgery,rehabilitation,orthopedics
[A case of lingual tuberculosis in acute disseminated tuberculosis (author's transl)].

H. Hirai,T. Nakatani,K. Hirol,S. Matsumoto,T. Yamada

1976-06-15

Abstract:
Sleep disturbance and response to surgical decompression in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized pilot comparison of open versus endoscopic release

Michael Patrick Gaspar,Meredith N Osterman,Eon K Shin,Arthur Lee Osterman,Patrick M Kane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i1.6474

2019-01-22

Abstract:Background: Sleep disturbance is a common complaint of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). While carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery has been shown to relieve subjective sleep-related complaints, data is lacking on the global effect on sleep using validated sleep measures. Additionally, it is not known if open (OCTR) or endoscopic release (ECTR) produce differing degrees of sleep-symptom relief. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to undergo either OCTR (n=30) or ECTR (n=30) surgery. Forty-three (71.7%) of the patients were female, and mean age of all patients was 49.4 years (range, 35-78). Prior to surgery, patients were administered three baseline self-reported outcome measures: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PQSI), the Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) survey, which were subsequently administered at three postoperative time points: 1-2 weeks, 4-6 weeks and 6-12 months. Results: All 60 patients experienced significant improvements in the three outcome scores by their first postoperative visit compared to preoperatively. ECTR provided superior improvement to OCTR at the first postoperative visit for ISI (P=0.006) and PSQI (P=0.016), and at the second visit for PSQI (P=0.0038). There were no significant differences between the two groups for the QuickDASH at any time points, or for the ISI/PSQI at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Endoscopic and open CTR both improve sleep symptoms postoperatively in the short-term which is sustained for 6-12 months, although endoscopic CTR does so more rapidly.
A Pilot Study In to the Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy Plus Conventional Physical Therapy on Clinical Outcomes and Electrodiagnostic Findings in People With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Milad Zarrin,Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari,Maryam Saadat,Mohammad Jafar Shaterzaedeh Yazdi,Davood Shalilahmadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i2.815

2023-06-01

Abstract:Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy that has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Current physical therapy treatment options show limited effects or low-quality evidence, especially in the long term. To date, there has been little research to look at the effects of treating the cervical spine on decreasing symptoms distally to the carpal tunnel. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cervical manual therapy plus conventional physical therapy on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot pretest/posttest and six-month follow-up clinical study included 15 adult patients with CTS. For two weeks, each patient received 10 sessions of supervised intervention treatment. The efficacy of the therapies was assessed at baseline (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), and six months after treatment (T2). The visual analog scale (VAS), a symptom severity scale, the functional capacity scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, median nerve motor distal latency (mMDL), and median sensory nerve conduction velocity (mSNCV) were outcome measures. Results: There were significant improvements in all measures between the baseline values at T0 and those recorded immediately after the treatment at T1 or six months later at T2 (p<.05). Conclusion: This pilot study indicates that cervical manual therapy plus conventional physical therapy applied for two weeks improves clinical outcomes and electrodiagnostic findings in people with CTS.

Steroid-induced inhibition of nucleoside uptake in isolated mouse thymocytes.

Outcomes of Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Double Crush Syndrome.

Can listeners hear how many singers are singing? The effect of listener's experience, vibrato, onset, and formant frequency on the perception of number of simultaneous singers.

Long-Term Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: A Multicenter Pragmatic Study

Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years

Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release

Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Combined with Cervical Nerve Root Compression

Early Postoperative Improvement in Sleep and Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release

Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Carpal Ligament Release via Different Approaches in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Complete remission of childhood-onset epilepsy: stability and prediction over two decades.

Differences in the Postoperative Outcomes According to the Primary Treatment Options Chosen by Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment

Simultaneous Versus Staged Surgery for Double Crush Syndrome of Cervical Radiculopathy and Peripheral Nerve Compression at the Wrist: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Cervical myeloradiculopathy with entrapment neuropathy: a study based on the double-crush concept

Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery

Pre-operative Two-Point Discrimination Predicts Response to Carpal Tunnel Release

Comparison of the Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Surgery and Nonsurgical Intervention in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simultaneous Versus Staged Surgery For Double Crush Syndrome Of Cervical Radiculopathy And Peripheral Nerve Compression At The Wrist

A randomized clinical trial on the changing of median nerve cross-sectional area and pain after extracorporeal shock wave and low-level laser therapy added to conventional physical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

[A case of lingual tuberculosis in acute disseminated tuberculosis (author's transl)].

Sleep disturbance and response to surgical decompression in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized pilot comparison of open versus endoscopic release

A Pilot Study In to the Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy Plus Conventional Physical Therapy on Clinical Outcomes and Electrodiagnostic Findings in People With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome